Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for SociaWallet

Channel

SociaWallet

@SociaWallet

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

609subscribers

-119 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003544280676
TypeChannel
Username@SociaWallet
CreatedBetween 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/SociaWallet

Growth

609728668.56 August 2026 — 728 subscribers6 August 2026 — 728 subscribers14 August 2026 — 712 subscribers21 August 2026 — 675 subscribers28 August 2026 — 651 subscribers7 September 2026 — 609 subscribers6 August 20267 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 33 days, net -119. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 591–746 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Sept 2026, 21:20609-42
28 Aug 2026, 22:34651-24
21 Aug 2026, 08:33675-37
14 Aug 2026, 01:46712-16
6 Aug 2026, 16:13728no change
6 Aug 2026, 08:48728first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 29 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

210 reactions across 20 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🏆7033.3%
6028.6%
👻4421.0%
👀3617.1%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 210 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 29 June 2026 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
51
across the posts below
Posts paid on
17
of 20 we hold a reading for · 85%
Most on one post
16
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @SociaWallet. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 June 2026 to 30 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

29 Jul 2026, 17:40 UTC≈2,500 views21 reactions3 Starsread 6 August 2026

Posted without readable text

👻11👀10

9 Jul 2026, 11:20 UTC194 views11 reactions8 Starsread 6 August 2026
Photo

—————————————— Easier to say than to fuck yourself anyway. —————————————— Like a office: walk into one room - they send you to another, then to a third, and in the third they just tell you to fuck off. Tired of it? We made unified support for @Socia. ▎One question - one answer. ▎No queues. No "not our department." —————————————— Ask away. We won't send you away. → Well, almost.

👻7👀4

8 Jul 2026, 21:40 UTC317 views13 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026
Photo

—————————————— WHY THE FUCK ARE YOU USING A DIFFERENT WALLET? —————————————— We're grinding on the best @SociaWallet every day. New version is coming. So fucking good we won't tell you what's inside - you'll see it yourself. While others flex CS kills, we flex functionality. ❝ Code. Break. Fix. Repeat. ❞ —————————————— Using something else? → Masochist or out of the loop.

👻8👀5

7 Jul 2026, 18:42 UTC496 views9 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026
Photo

Yo, what's up. So... winner found. Turned out to be some bot. We're fucking shocked. For real. We were like: "Well, shit." Sorry about that. But honestly - all complaints go to the service that didn't provide proper protection, not to us (hopefully they don't make condoms). We're just the messengers. We ran a giveaway. What went wrong? Shit happens. Anyway, that's the sad part. AND NOW... Who got the secret prize?

6🏆3

6 Jul 2026, 22:09 UTC179 views12 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026
Photo

Well, which of you won? We're summing up the results of the contest. Today we'll announce who won and what prize they received. Thank you for your patience. The NFT gift giveaway is already over, and soon we'll summarize the results of the second giveaway (secret prize). JUST DON'T INCREASE THE BRIGHTNESS OF THE PHOTO!!! Welcome to @SociaWallet | @Socia.

8🏆4

5 Jul 2026, 21:18 UTC496 views13 reactions5 Starsread 6 August 2026

▎CLICK ON THIS TEXT, WHY DID YOU READ THE LAST ONE AND NOT PARTICIPATE HERE

🏆85

5 Jul 2026, 15:55 UTC≈2,650 views17 reactions2 Starsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Alright folks. We thought about it and decided: let's run a giveaway. But an unfair one. Because we felt like it. Listen, we don't like fluff. So let's get straight to it. We have a prize. But we were like: "Why not make you work a little for an extra bonus?" So we added conditions. For the main prize winner - the tricky scheme: If you win but you've never even opened the bot - you get only one gift. Sucks? Maybe. B

🏆125

4 Jul 2026, 15:16 UTC679 views9 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026
Video

We revamped the cashback system! Now you can swap your shitcoin and get cashback. Literally for free - swap it, and it flows right back like your ex after you got a raise. No delays, no complicated formulas, no "we'll call you back." Just pure, unadulterated free money. Well, almost. And if you hooked someone on your referral link - congratulations, you're now their silent partner. You get a cut from every single o

5🏆4

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @SociaWallet. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“SociaWallet” (@SociaWallet), 609 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SociaWallet.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.