Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for SOCRATES | سقراط

Channel

SOCRATES | سقراط

@Socrates7store

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

1,050subscribers

+388 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002139250373
TypeChannel
Username@Socrates7store
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live2 September 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 2 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Socrates7store

Growth

6621,0868746 August 2026 — 662 subscribers6 August 2026 — 662 subscribers6 August 2026 — 663 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,023 subscribers17 August 2026 — 1,018 subscribers20 August 2026 — 1,086 subscribers23 August 2026 — 1,080 subscribers26 August 2026 — 1,070 subscribers30 August 2026 — 1,060 subscribers2 September 2026 — 1,050 subscribers1,0506 August 20262 September 2026
10 measurements spanning 27 days, net +388. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 598–1,150 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
2 Sept 2026, 08:041,050-10
30 Aug 2026, 01:341,060-10
26 Aug 2026, 21:561,070-10
23 Aug 2026, 23:281,080-6
20 Aug 2026, 14:031,086+68
17 Aug 2026, 10:461,018-5
13 Aug 2026, 17:461,023+360
6 Aug 2026, 21:41663+1
6 Aug 2026, 17:18662no change
6 Aug 2026, 08:23662first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 24 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

117 reactions across 18 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 17.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2117.9%
🤣1916.2%
custom 52558815789695749291815.4%
custom 54561406740280194861311.1%
custom 5244736692887236286119.40%
custom 521983833368063203897.69%
custom 532579936876102749386.84%
custom 581920020379363437165.13%
💔43.42%
🗿32.56%
🫡32.56%
custom 539988862835885551821.71%

Custom emoji. 7 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 117 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 15:14 UTC92 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026

تستحق التأمل في كثير من الأحيان لا يكون الإنسان راغبًا في إنهاء حياته، بقدر ما يكون راغبًا في إنهاء الألم الذي يعيشه أو تغيير واقع يثقله. لذلك ليس كل من يقول: "تعبت من الحياة" يريد أن يفقدها، بل قد يكون قد فقد الأمل في أن تتغير. في أعماق كثير من النفوس، ليست الرغبة في الموت هي المشكلة، وإنما الرغبة في موت اليأس، وموت الخوف، وموت الفشل، وموت الشعور بالوحدة والعجز. الإنسان خُلق محبًا للحياة، باحثًا عن المعنى، فإذا

custom 52447366928872362865

4 Aug 2026, 21:34 UTC146 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

الرفاق الي مشتركين في الحساب هذا الحساب الحساب انتهى اشتراكه يريد يحجز تجديد يتواصل معي @socrat7_bot مع ملاحظة الذي دخلوا متاخرين لاتقلقوا بنجدد لكم ونوفيكم شهر.. بيتم حذف جميع المحادثات عشان الذاكرة حق ChatGPT فل‌‌ النّص المترجم: ar-ar الرفاق الي مشتركين في الحساب هذا الحساب بينتهي في 7 أغسطس الي يريد يحجز تجديد يتواصل معي @socrat7_bot مع ملاحظة الذي دخلوا متاخرين لاتقلقوا بنجدد لكم ونوفيكم شهر.. بيتم حذف ج

custom 52558815789695749293custom 54561406740280194861custom 58192002037936343711

4 Aug 2026, 21:11 UTC146 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Poll

تريدوا تخفيض في؟!

  1. ChatGPT plus63%
  2. تليجرام مميز29%
  3. gemini pro8%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

custom 52558815789695749293custom 52447366928872362861custom 54561406740280194861custom 58192002037936343711

4 Aug 2026, 21:10 UTC140 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026

بيطالبوا بتخفيض فيChatGPT plus

custom 52558815789695749294custom 58192002037936343711

4 Aug 2026, 21:08 UTC145 views8 reactionsread 6 August 2026

مارايكم نفعل لكم تخفيض في حسابات محدد

custom 54561406740280194864custom 58192002037936343712custom 52558815789695749291custom 53998886283588555181

4 Aug 2026, 17:19 UTC165 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026

قناة متفاعلة 2.4k للبيع بـ 19 دولار. تريد تشتري وجاد @socrat7_bot

🫡1custom 52447366928872362861custom 54561406740280194861

4 Aug 2026, 16:52 UTC178 views12 reactionsread 6 August 2026

هل تعرف أخطر أنواع الإدمان؟ ليس إدمان المخدرات بل إدمان الاعتياد على المعاناة. بعض الأشخاص يعتادون القلق، والضغط، والعلاقات السامة، حتى تصبح الراحة نفسها غريبة ومقلقة بالنسبة لهم. ليس كل ما اعتدت عليه صحيًا أحيانًا أكبر سجن نفسي هو ما أصبح “طبيعيًا” بالنسبة لك.

custom 52558815789695749296custom 52447366928872362864🫡1custom 54561406740280194861

2 Aug 2026, 20:19 UTC209 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026

موجود لدينا تعزيزات قنوات للتواصل:- @socrat7_bot تعاملات سقراط: @Socratt7

custom 54561406740280194862

2 Aug 2026, 20:18 UTC146 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026

كن مميزًا واشترك في تليجرام مميز اشتراك لمدة سنة ب 17 الف اشتراك لمدة 6 أشهر ب9500 ريال اشتراك لمدة 3 أشهر ب7500 للتواصل:- @socrat7_bot تعاملات سقراط: @Socratt7

custom 54561406740280194863

2 Aug 2026, 16:58 UTC233 views13 reactionsread 6 August 2026

الي عامل هذا الايموجي 🫡 جعل يسلم عليك وقت الاختبار

🤣13

2 Aug 2026, 14:54 UTC257 views16 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

لأصحاب كوورس الجراحة بيسلم عليكم اليوم بلغنا السلام بقوته😂💔

custom 53257993687610274938🤣6🫡1custom 52558815789695749291

1 Aug 2026, 15:27 UTC356 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026

الفوبيا (الرهاب) هي خوف شديد وغير متناسب من موقف أو شيء معين، يؤدي إلى تجنب مستمر رغم إدراك الشخص أن الخوف مبالغ فيه. تنشأ نتيجة تفاعل الاستعداد الوراثي، وتجارب سلبية سابقة، والتعلم، وزيادة حساسية دوائر الخوف في الدماغ وفي بعض الأحيان تكون الأسبا غير واضحة . أكثر الأنواع شيوعًا: - رهاب المرتفعات. - رهاب الطيران. - رهاب الأماكن المغلقة. - رهاب الإبر أو الدم. - رهاب الحيوانات (مثل الكلاب أو العناكب). - الرهاب الاجتما

4

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Socrates7store. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

4 Aug 2026, 21:11 UTCAnonymous Poll49 voters

تريدوا تخفيض في؟!

  1. ChatGPT plus63%
  2. تليجرام مميز29%
  3. gemini pro8%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 5 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“SOCRATES | سقراط” (@Socrates7store), 1,050 subscribers as measured 2 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Socrates7store.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.