Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Sol Vigilantes ☎️

Channel

Sol Vigilantes ☎️

@SolVigilantes

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

53,590subscribers

-8,422 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002197288368
TypeChannel
Username@SolVigilantes
DescriptionGet exclusive weekly signals and discover the next 100x project with us 💎 🦇 Stay vigilant and be prepared! Remember to DYOR! Inquires @batmantakesol Feedback @VigilantesCave
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 November 2026
Measurements held58
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 4 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/SolVigilantes

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 4 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@pepeknowsbest/218677 May 2026, 17:24 UTC@SolVigilantes/23741 · this entry7 May 2026, 17:24 UTC1.00under a minute
@pepeknowsbest/218697 May 2026, 17:45 UTC@SolVigilantes/23743 · this entry7 May 2026, 17:45 UTC1.00under a minute
@pepeknowsbest/218737 May 2026, 19:00 UTC@SolVigilantes/23747 · this entry7 May 2026, 19:00 UTC1.00under a minute
@pepeknowsbest/218777 May 2026, 20:15 UTC@SolVigilantes/23751 · this entry7 May 2026, 20:15 UTC1.00under a minute
@pepeknowsbest/218838 May 2026, 05:01 UTC@SolVigilantes/23757 · this entry8 May 2026, 05:01 UTC1.00under a minute
@pepeknowsbest/218858 May 2026, 05:18 UTC@SolVigilantes/23759 · this entry8 May 2026, 05:19 UTC1.00under a minute
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@pepeknowsbest12 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.99under a minute@pepeknowsbest (12–0)
@memetakeovers11 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (10–1)
@apingdegen10 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minute@apingdegen (10–0)
@memewars2510 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minute@memewars25 (9–1)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 32 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 14 comparable posts for this entry, running 7 May 2026 to 8 May 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 5, the earliest publisher we hold is @pepeknowsbest. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_source, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 4 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

53,59062,01257,8017 August 2026 — 62,012 subscribers7 August 2026 — 62,012 subscribers8 August 2026 — 61,859 subscribers9 August 2026 — 61,753 subscribers10 August 2026 — 61,698 subscribers11 August 2026 — 61,572 subscribers12 August 2026 — 61,431 subscribers14 August 2026 — 61,355 subscribers15 August 2026 — 61,206 subscribers16 August 2026 — 61,045 subscribers17 August 2026 — 60,951 subscribers19 August 2026 — 60,842 subscribers19 August 2026 — 60,709 subscribers20 August 2026 — 60,656 subscribers22 August 2026 — 60,488 subscribers24 August 2026 — 60,312 subscribers25 August 2026 — 60,191 subscribers26 August 2026 — 60,132 subscribers27 August 2026 — 60,040 subscribers28 August 2026 — 59,893 subscribers29 August 2026 — 59,776 subscribers30 August 2026 — 59,673 subscribers30 August 2026 — 59,582 subscribers31 August 2026 — 59,483 subscribers1 September 2026 — 59,332 subscribers3 September 2026 — 59,225 subscribers4 September 2026 — 59,077 subscribers7 September 2026 — 58,758 subscribers10 September 2026 — 58,446 subscribers12 September 2026 — 58,258 subscribers14 September 2026 — 58,103 subscribers16 September 2026 — 57,977 subscribers18 September 2026 — 57,769 subscribers1 October 2026 — 56,650 subscribers6 October 2026 — 56,191 subscribers10 October 2026 — 55,843 subscribers13 October 2026 — 55,534 subscribers15 October 2026 — 55,405 subscribers16 October 2026 — 55,315 subscribers17 October 2026 — 55,213 subscribers18 October 2026 — 55,133 subscribers19 October 2026 — 55,030 subscribers20 October 2026 — 54,926 subscribers21 October 2026 — 54,841 subscribers22 October 2026 — 54,732 subscribers23 October 2026 — 54,579 subscribers24 October 2026 — 54,499 subscribers25 October 2026 — 54,429 subscribers26 October 2026 — 54,389 subscribers27 October 2026 — 54,309 subscribers28 October 2026 — 54,218 subscribers29 October 2026 — 54,123 subscribers30 October 2026 — 54,001 subscribers31 October 2026 — 53,916 subscribers1 November 2026 — 53,811 subscribers2 November 2026 — 53,727 subscribers3 November 2026 — 53,658 subscribers4 November 2026 — 53,590 subscribers7 August 20264 November 2026
58 measurements spanning 89 days, net -8,422. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 52,327–63,275 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 58
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Nov 2026, 06:2253,590-68
3 Nov 2026, 05:2953,658-69
2 Nov 2026, 07:1153,727-84
1 Nov 2026, 04:4953,811-105
31 Oct 2026, 07:4153,916-85
30 Oct 2026, 10:3054,001-122
29 Oct 2026, 09:3754,123-95
28 Oct 2026, 08:3954,218-91
27 Oct 2026, 06:0054,309-80
26 Oct 2026, 08:4454,389-40
25 Oct 2026, 08:3854,429-70
24 Oct 2026, 11:0754,499-80
23 Oct 2026, 13:5654,579-153
22 Oct 2026, 10:4654,732-109
21 Oct 2026, 03:1954,841-85
20 Oct 2026, 02:1054,926-104
19 Oct 2026, 01:5955,030-103
18 Oct 2026, 02:3655,133-80
17 Oct 2026, 04:2555,213-102
16 Oct 2026, 03:5155,315first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 7 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 180 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈2,040
Videos
≈40
Links
≈696

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 4 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Recent posts

8 May 2026, 05:19 UTC≈4,030 viewsread 4 November 2026
Photo

🦠 Pandemic mode continued as $HENTAI continued to spread all across the blockchain and the trenches! In our last update, we were just shy of a $2 million market cap—and we’ve now officially cleared it 💨 Despite multiple dips, we’ve bounced back each time and come back even stronger! $HENTAI Updated ATH Stats below: ⬇️ • $6.0M in volume (past 24 hours) • ATH increase of 1,190x 🔥 • $2.3M peak market cap • Trending …

8 May 2026, 05:01 UTC≈2,120 viewsread 4 November 2026
Photo

$HENTAI Is INFECTIOUS to the Max 🦠 - Launched just 1 day and 4 hours ago - $6M in 24-hour volume—crazy! - Funds keep pouring in nonstop - Still rocking the DEX Top 5 - Biggest buzz this week—and we’re only getting started New all-time high update coming soon—stay tuned! 👀

8 May 2026, 04:38 UTC≈1,770 viewsread 4 November 2026
Photo

$90K has already been raised for $APPLE, and the chart is holding support like a champ 👑 That fox mascot is unbelievably memeable—once the “surgery” kicks off, we’ll be streaming every step! If $APPLE makes it through alive, we could potentially hit a $10 million market cap 🤯 👀 Everything will stay transparent and public This project still has plenty of runway ✅ Never sleep on our insider drops—they’re top-tier …

7 May 2026, 20:43 UTC≈1,260 viewsread 4 November 2026
Photo

🦠 Our $HENTAI bags are officially in pandemic mode! Viruses are green. Charts are green. Early members portfolio’s are green. From early infection to moonshot — this hentai virus doesn’t stop ✅ $HENTAI Updated ATH Stats below: ⬇️ • $3.5M in volume (past 24 hours) • ATH increase of 884x 🔥 • $1.7M peak market cap • Trending #5 on Dexscreener • Over 1,500 holders CRAZY THAT WE CALLED THIS ONE SPOT ON! 💯 #Vigilan…

7 May 2026, 20:26 UTC818 viewsread 4 November 2026
Photo

THE MOST MONUMENTAL SWING SINCE THIS TOKEN DROPPED 19 HOURS AGO! $HENTAI nearly blasted to a $2 million market cap, and now it’s racking up $3.2 million in trading volume—sitting at #5 on DEX leaderboards 🔥 On-chain indicators are red-hot, and there’s serious money on the table 🤑 👀 Keep an eye on established coins, but don’t sleep on momentum narrative driven plays like $HENTAI 👈 Stay locked with the #Vigilantes …

7 May 2026, 20:15 UTC706 viewsread 4 November 2026
Photo

🚨 ANOTHER NEW ATH—WE’RE BREAKING ALL THE RECORDS! $1 MILLION VALIDATION IS IN THE BOOKS, BABY! 😎 Check out that fat green candle—it’s a full-blown pandemic in our portfolios. If this thing spreads like COVID did, we’re in for stratospheric gains. $HENTAI just leveled up again 🔥 LOCK IN THOSE PROFITS AND DUMP YOUR MOONBAGS! 💰🤑

7 May 2026, 19:16 UTC643 viewsread 4 November 2026
Photo

🦠 $HENTAI just keeps spreading! If it isn’t one ATH, it’s the next—lol Every pump and bounce just cements this play ✅ $HENTAI Updated ATH Stats below: ⬇️ • $2.1M in volume (past 24 hours) • ATH increase of 351x 🔥 • $700K peak market cap • Trending #9 on Dexscreener • Over 1,500 holders Don’t let the eye-watering charts fool you—what shoots up parabolically can crash just as hard 💯 🚨 The smartest move? Cash out …

7 May 2026, 19:00 UTC548 viewsread 4 November 2026
Photo

🦠 $HENTAI Massive Gains Insider Success Spotlight ✨ One member transformed a $200 ape into more than $19K+ by jumping in early on our $HENTAI token! The key was timing—those who enter right at the drop often experience exponential returns 🤑 On the next call, a major investor plans to ape $10K, and several other large whales are gearing up to follow suit… That level of commitment from big players is an encouraging…

7 May 2026, 18:13 UTC579 viewsread 4 November 2026
Photo

🚨 700K TAPPED AFTER DIPPING AS LOW AS 400K 🤯 Healthy pullbacks are part of the game, and this rebound just shows $HENTAI’s rock-solid strength! It keeps bouncing back from every slump, no questions asked 🙏 ⚠️ TAKE MORE AND MORE PROFITS AS WE CLIMB!

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @SolVigilantes. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Sol Vigilantes ☎️” (@SolVigilantes), 53,590 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SolVigilantes.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.