Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for MEME CALLS - SOL

Channel

MEME CALLS - SOL

@SolanaScanner

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

10,163subscribers

-179 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002019065172
TypeChannel
Username@SolanaScanner
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 September 2026
Measurements held27
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 4 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/SolanaScanner

Growth

10,08610,34210,2147 August 2026 — 10,342 subscribers7 August 2026 — 10,342 subscribers7 August 2026 — 10,339 subscribers9 August 2026 — 10,336 subscribers10 August 2026 — 10,325 subscribers11 August 2026 — 10,318 subscribers12 August 2026 — 10,315 subscribers13 August 2026 — 10,300 subscribers14 August 2026 — 10,281 subscribers16 August 2026 — 10,272 subscribers17 August 2026 — 10,268 subscribers18 August 2026 — 10,250 subscribers19 August 2026 — 10,215 subscribers20 August 2026 — 10,209 subscribers21 August 2026 — 10,205 subscribers23 August 2026 — 10,195 subscribers24 August 2026 — 10,186 subscribers25 August 2026 — 10,171 subscribers26 August 2026 — 10,165 subscribers27 August 2026 — 10,156 subscribers28 August 2026 — 10,123 subscribers29 August 2026 — 10,086 subscribers30 August 2026 — 10,089 subscribers31 August 2026 — 10,117 subscribers2 September 2026 — 10,116 subscribers3 September 2026 — 10,114 subscribers4 September 2026 — 10,163 subscribers10,1637 August 20264 September 2026
27 measurements spanning 28 days, net -179. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,048–10,380 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 27
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Sept 2026, 23:2110,163+49
3 Sept 2026, 09:0410,114-2
2 Sept 2026, 00:1510,116-1
31 Aug 2026, 23:3810,117+28
30 Aug 2026, 20:0510,089+3
29 Aug 2026, 20:0210,086-37
28 Aug 2026, 18:5710,123-33
27 Aug 2026, 16:3510,156-9
26 Aug 2026, 15:0310,165-6
25 Aug 2026, 17:1710,171-15
24 Aug 2026, 16:2710,186-9
23 Aug 2026, 03:3310,195-10
21 Aug 2026, 14:5610,205-4
20 Aug 2026, 16:5510,209-6
19 Aug 2026, 17:2810,215-35
18 Aug 2026, 15:0810,250-18
17 Aug 2026, 17:4810,268-4
16 Aug 2026, 14:3610,272-9
14 Aug 2026, 19:0710,281-19
13 Aug 2026, 07:4510,300first reading

Engagement

75 posts held, back to 6 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 37 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
9.08%
avg views ÷ 10,163 subscribers
Avg views / post
923
51 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.32%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
51
of 75 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 17 of 51 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held75 (6 July 202628 August 2026)
Views total47,064
Reactions total507
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Aug 2026, 03:54 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

507 reactions across 17 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥507100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 75 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 507 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 75 most recent posts we hold, published 6 July 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 13:09 UTC725 views34 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

BREAKING: Ethereum breaks above $2,500

🔥34

26 Aug 2026, 19:13 UTC733 views24 reactionsread 29 August 2026

GM GM legends market looks good. Heavyweights are moving in motion. Our solid bags are pumping as well. lets keeping going with same momentum

🔥24

25 Aug 2026, 02:30 UTC≈1,430 views29 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

JUST IN: Bitcoin surges to $81,000

🔥29

24 Aug 2026, 12:53 UTC≈1,440 views29 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

JUST IN: Bitcoin reclaims $79,000

🔥29

22 Aug 2026, 16:15 UTC≈1,480 views41 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Bitcoin just had its strongest week in over two years, reaching around 77K while ETH and several altcoins have also been rallying.

🔥41

22 Aug 2026, 16:14 UTC≈1,470 views32 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Lots of things happening in crypto land. I think it’s bull run season?

🔥32

21 Aug 2026, 08:38 UTC≈1,500 views49 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

JUST IN: Ethereum surpasses $2,400

🔥49

21 Aug 2026, 08:18 UTC≈1,900 views30 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Its time to return out of retirement and go full-time back again in trench mode

🔥30

Showing the 12 most recent of 75 posts we hold for @SolanaScanner. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

14 Jul 2026, 15:57 UTCAnonymous Poll16 voters

Let’s call some bullish Robinhood plays 👀

  1. Yes63%
  2. No6%
  3. Only sol plays50%

The shares total 119%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 75 most recent posts we hold, published 6 July 2026 to 28 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“MEME CALLS - SOL” (@SolanaScanner), 10,163 subscribers as measured 4 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SolanaScanner.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.