Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for SOLANA📈DRAGON🐉CALLS☎️

Channel

SOLANA📈DRAGON🐉CALLS☎️

@Solanadragoncalls

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

22,976subscribers

-12,728 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001636648726
TypeChannel
Username@Solanadragoncalls
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held28
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Solanadragoncalls

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

22,97639,39931,187.512 August 2026 — 35,704 subscribers12 August 2026 — 35,165 subscribers14 August 2026 — 34,513 subscribers15 August 2026 — 33,699 subscribers16 August 2026 — 39,399 subscribers17 August 2026 — 38,813 subscribers18 August 2026 — 38,140 subscribers20 August 2026 — 37,550 subscribers21 August 2026 — 36,069 subscribers22 August 2026 — 34,791 subscribers24 August 2026 — 33,295 subscribers25 August 2026 — 32,661 subscribers26 August 2026 — 32,252 subscribers27 August 2026 — 31,472 subscribers28 August 2026 — 30,863 subscribers29 August 2026 — 36,263 subscribers30 August 2026 — 30,756 subscribers31 August 2026 — 29,966 subscribers1 September 2026 — 29,409 subscribers2 September 2026 — 28,725 subscribers3 September 2026 — 28,118 subscribers5 September 2026 — 27,428 subscribers8 September 2026 — 26,293 subscribers11 September 2026 — 25,092 subscribers13 September 2026 — 24,388 subscribers15 September 2026 — 24,144 subscribers16 September 2026 — 23,499 subscribers19 September 2026 — 22,976 subscribers12 August 202619 September 2026
28 measurements spanning 38 days, net -12,728. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 20,513–41,862 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 28
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 02:5822,976-523
16 Sept 2026, 20:3623,499-645
15 Sept 2026, 00:4024,144-244
13 Sept 2026, 08:5924,388-704
11 Sept 2026, 09:0025,092-1,201
8 Sept 2026, 11:1626,293-1,135
5 Sept 2026, 06:4027,428-690
3 Sept 2026, 09:5728,118-607
2 Sept 2026, 06:5728,725-684
1 Sept 2026, 05:4529,409-557
31 Aug 2026, 02:5529,966-790
30 Aug 2026, 05:2530,756-5,507
29 Aug 2026, 08:4536,263+5,400
28 Aug 2026, 05:5730,863-609
27 Aug 2026, 05:3431,472-780
26 Aug 2026, 05:1232,252-409
25 Aug 2026, 05:1432,661-634
24 Aug 2026, 06:3733,295-1,496
22 Aug 2026, 10:5734,791-1,278
21 Aug 2026, 00:3336,069first reading

Engagement

36 posts held, back to 27 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 45 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
60.0%
avg views ÷ 22,976 subscribers
Avg views / post
13,800
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.48%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 36 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 September 2026
Posts held36 (27 June 2026 – 4 September 2026)
Views total55,168
Reactions total1,920
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken4 Sept 2026, 12:18 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

8,797 reactions across 18 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 11.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥1,02411.6%
❤1,00311.4%
💯99711.3%
👍99411.3%
🎉98011.1%
❤‍🔥95610.9%
😍93910.7%
🤩90510.3%
🥰88710.1%
🏆340.386%
🤗290.33%
🙏250.284%
👏240.273%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 36 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8,797 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 36 most recent posts we hold, published 27 June 2026 to 4 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
15
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 18 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
15
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Solanadragoncalls. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 36 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 June 2026 to 4 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

4 Sept 2026, 09:50 UTC268 views403 reactionsread 4 September 2026
Photo

🚗 SPX — The Future of Digital Commerce Is Here! Meet ShopinX🛍 ($SPX) — a utility-driven Web3 commerce ecosystem built on BNB🪙 Chain, connecting crypto with real-world shopping and rewards.🛍 🔥 400+ Brand Integrations 💎 1B Fixed Supply — No Mint 🔒 750M SPX Locked On-Chain ⚡️ Fast & Low-Cost BNB Chain Transactions 🏆 Independent Audit Score: 89/100 🌍 Real-World Commerce Utility 🛍SPX is designed to bring blockchain clos…

💯50🤩50🎉49❤47🔥46😍46👍44🥰40

31 Aug 2026, 06:40 UTC≈20,200 views404 reactionsread 4 September 2026
Photo

🪶 ROBINHOOD CHAIN | $CHUMP THE CHICKEN WITH A BILLION-DOLLAR MISSION! 🐔🇺🇸 👌 $CHUMP is bringing a powerful💪 meme narrative to the Robinhood Chain backed by serious funding, strong branding, and a community united behind one massive goal. ✅ Built on Robinhood Chain🪶 ✅ Iconic chicken-themed meme branding 🐔 ✅ Well-funded team & serious backing ✅ Strong community-driven narrative ✅Massive target: $CHUMP TO $1 BILLION+ …

🎉66❤63🔥61💯53👍49🏆34😍22❤‍🔥20

27 Aug 2026, 15:35 UTC≈18,600 views802 reactionsread 4 September 2026
Photo

🚩nine2five🚩 CAT😼 Another meeting.👨‍💻 Another spreadsheet. Another “quick call” that definitely wasn’t quick.⚡️ 9️⃣nine2five5️⃣ CAT😁 has had enough. He’s the permanently exhausted office👨‍💻 cat representing everyone who has ever stared at the clock⏰ at 2:17pm and wondered how it’s still not Friday.😇 9️⃣nine2five5️⃣ CAT was created for the people stuck in the loop⏳ — commute, work,👨‍💻 sleep,😴 repeat🔄 — who still ha…

❤109❤‍🔥99🤩96🔥92💯90😍87🎉80👍75

27 Aug 2026, 08:41 UTC≈16,100 views311 reactionsread 4 September 2026
Photo

🪙 SOL $CATE The cat😺 version of Doge Born from the same pure meme energy❇️ that turned a Shiba Inu into a global phenomenon, Cate is the feline answer to the internet’s🖥 favourite dog coin. No complicated roadmap, no fake utility promises,🤝 just the classic dogs vs cats😎 rivalry played out on the blockchain.🔗 It’s a community driven memecoin through and through. CA📌 Ai66LHZG9MCzg1WKdawwqduVAXpNDUuV8M3uyq5ppump 🌐…

💯51🎉42🤩37❤34😍32❤‍🔥31👍28🔥28

22 Aug 2026, 13:31 UTC≈22,200 views709 reactionsread 4 September 2026
Photo

Something interesting is coming from BitPrimax 👀. They’re about to launch a Bug Hunt with a $1,000 reward🏆 pool. You’ll get to test👨‍💻 the app, spot issues, report them and potentially get rewarded for useful finds.🖥 Full details aren’t out yet, but if you want to get in early and be eligible to participate:🎉 → ❌ Follow https://x.com/BitprimaxHQ → ✈️ Join the https://t.me/bitprimax → 🌐 Website: www.bitprimax.co…

❤‍🔥100👍91💯90😍85❤80🔥75🥰71🤩64

21 Aug 2026, 11:48 UTC≈15,700 views439 reactionsread 4 September 2026
Photo

🐕⚡️ M2B — MEME 2 BLOCKCHAIN 🪙 Some communities💬 get interesting after everyone arrives. The good ones are interesting BEFORE they arrive. 👀 M2B is building around what meme culture actually runs on: 🔥 Community 😂 Good vibes 🤝 People who show up 🚀 And enough chaos to keep things interesting The pack is still early. Come see what we’re building. 🐕💙💛 🚀 Telegram: https://t.me/meme2blockchain ❌ X: https://x.com/Meme…

👍67🎉55❤52🔥48❤‍🔥47🥰45💯43🤩41

Showing the 12 most recent of 36 posts we hold for @Solanadragoncalls. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@Solanadragoncalls edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
22 August 2026
Most recent edit
22 August 2026

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“SOLANA📈DRAGON🐉CALLS☎️” (@Solanadragoncalls), 22,976 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Solanadragoncalls.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.