Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Views per post sit far below this size band
1.0 average views per post against 5,477 subscribers — an engagement rate of 0.018%. Across the 3,855 registered channels in the same cohort — 3,186–9,999 subscribers, posting mainly in English — the middle half sit between 3.07% and 17.6%, with a median of 7.83%.
What this was computed from
Window
30 days (5 October 2026 – 4 November 2026)
Posts measured
314 of 314 published in the window (314 exact, 0 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled
314
Mature posts only
0.018% over 58 posts read at least 24h after publication
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or below the 1st percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — below it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_low, last confirmed 4 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
44 measurements spanning 88 days, net -27,674. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,326–37,302 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 44
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
4 Nov 2026, 00:26
5,477
-7
31 Oct 2026, 21:19
5,484
-1,875
29 Oct 2026, 01:08
7,359
-3,129
28 Oct 2026, 02:47
10,488
-2
27 Oct 2026, 01:17
10,490
-4
25 Oct 2026, 03:25
10,494
-3
24 Oct 2026, 01:50
10,497
-7,653
22 Oct 2026, 22:39
18,150
-9,365
21 Oct 2026, 23:16
27,515
-1
20 Oct 2026, 21:37
27,516
-1
19 Oct 2026, 17:58
27,517
-7
18 Oct 2026, 15:57
27,524
-2
17 Oct 2026, 15:38
27,526
-4
16 Oct 2026, 12:35
27,530
-2
15 Oct 2026, 14:46
27,532
-2
14 Oct 2026, 13:28
27,534
-5
12 Oct 2026, 23:05
27,539
-7
8 Oct 2026, 14:01
27,546
-12
4 Oct 2026, 02:37
27,558
-5,522
25 Sept 2026, 07:21
33,080
first reading
Engagement
1,039 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 132 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
0.018%
avg views ÷ 5,477 subscribers
Avg views / post
1.0
298 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
298
of 1,039 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 October 2026
Posts held
1,039 (6 August 2026 – 22 October 2026)
Views total
298
Reactions total
—
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
22 Oct 2026, 20:07 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
5h 17m
Average length
1m 48s
Measured directly from 177 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Advertising
Ad load
0.6%
6 of 1,000 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
0
none — marked by hashtag only
Median views · ads
1.0
over 6 measured posts
Median views · rest
1.0
over 994 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. They are printed side by side with the count behind each rather than as a ratio: an ad and an ordinary post are not otherwise matched — for topic, for length, for hour of day — so the gap between them is a description of two groups and not the effect of one being an ad.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 11 August 2026 to 22 October 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 4 of 298 posts held from the last 30 days (1.34%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Today’s calendar focusses on UK retail sales figures, followed by S&P Global manufacturing and services PMIs for the eurozone, the UK, and the US.
#FPMarkets
NEW: 🟠 Bitcoin dominance climbs past 60%, the highest in 5 months!
New capital continues to flow into BTC.
Source: https://x.com/BitcoinMagazine/status/2113329130326671464
🚨 BREAKING: Meta default insurance hits a record high
🔹 $META 5-year credit default swaps at 114.5 bps, an all-time high (Markit data)
🔹 Insuring $10M of Meta debt now costs about $114,500 a year
💰 @money
🇺🇸 BREAKING: TRUMP calls Elon Musk, asks him to reverse Starlink restrictions on Ukraine — WSJ
🔹 Trump reportedly voiced frustration over the Starlink slowdown, which US officials say Musk ordered
🔹 US lawmakers now demanding an inquiry into SpaceX's role in Ukraine's defense
💰 @money
XRP has reached the support zone, just like BTC, and I expect to see a reversal and a fill of the imbalances above.
Let’s open this trade ⬇️
✅Entry price: 1.3024
📌Target: 1.3160 / 1.3625 / 1.4125
❌Stop: 1.2491
⚡️ BREAKING: a16z drops "crypto" from its flagship fund — now "a16z Frontier"
🔹 Mandate widens beyond crypto to broader frontier tech
🔹 Chris Dixon: firm will keep investing in crypto & pushing for sensible regulation
💰 @money
DEVLEOPING: 🇨🇦 A proposed class action has been filed in Canada against COLDCARD maker Coinkite and co-founders Rodolfo Novak and Peter D. Gray.
The lawsuit alleges they knew about the wallet’s seed-generation flaw as early as May 2025 and failed to warn users.
Roughly $116 MILLION in Bitcoin was stolen after the vulnerability was exploited.
Source: https://x.com/SimplyBitcoin/status/2113290304245899611
BREAKING: 🟠 Visa aims for a big crypto expansion, in talks to buy Fireblocks for $2.5B — Axios
• 2,000+ clients including BNY and Revolut
• NYDFS-regulated qualified custodian
Source: https://x.com/BitcoinArchive/status/2113252357014274398
JUST IN: 🇦🇪 Robinhood has been approved by the Dubai Financial Services Authority to launch Bitcoin and digital asset trading in the Middle East 🚀
Source: https://x.com/BitcoinMagazine/status/2113269952601862167
JUST IN: 🇺🇸 U.S. Spot Bitcoin ETFs have seen $1.07 billion in inflows so far this week 🚀
Source: https://x.com/BitcoinMagazine/status/2113221938659369357
JUST IN: 🟠 Strive's Jeff Walton said, "This is a #Bitcoin gold rush. We're all trying to accumulate as much BTC as humanly possible."
"We know we're in a debt crisis, they're going to print more money, and we want to be at the forefront of the new monetary ecosystem."
"We are attracting new capital from different pools to the market, and that fundamentally changes how BTC will operate in the future."
Source: https…
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,039 posts we hold for @Soldi_fals1o. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@Soldi_fals1o edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
22 September 2026
Most recent edit
10 October 2026
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“SOLDI BANCONOTE” (@Soldi_fals1o), 5,477 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Soldi_fals1o.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.