Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for SOLDI BANCONOTE

Channel

SOLDI BANCONOTE

@Soldi_fals1o

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Advertising · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

5,477subscribers

-27,674 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001933547687
TypeChannel
Username@Soldi_fals1o
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 November 2026
Measurements held44
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 4 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/Soldi_fals1o

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far below this size band

1.0 average views per post against 5,477 subscribers — an engagement rate of 0.018%. Across the 3,855 registered channels in the same cohort — 3,186–9,999 subscribers, posting mainly in English — the middle half sit between 3.07% and 17.6%, with a median of 7.83%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (5 October 2026 – 4 November 2026)
Posts measured314 of 314 published in the window (314 exact, 0 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled314
Mature posts only0.018% over 58 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers5,477 measured 4 November 2026
Cohortb3162:eng · 3,855 channels · p10 0.993% · p25 3.07% · p50 7.83% · p75 17.6% · p90 30.0%
Position in cohort0.026th percentile · 1/500 the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.053% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageEnglish · 100.0% of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or below the 1st percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — below it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_low, last confirmed 4 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

5,47733,15119,3147 August 2026 — 33,151 subscribers7 August 2026 — 33,151 subscribers10 August 2026 — 33,150 subscribers11 August 2026 — 33,148 subscribers13 August 2026 — 33,147 subscribers16 August 2026 — 33,145 subscribers17 August 2026 — 33,143 subscribers18 August 2026 — 33,142 subscribers19 August 2026 — 33,141 subscribers22 August 2026 — 33,140 subscribers25 August 2026 — 33,139 subscribers27 August 2026 — 33,138 subscribers29 August 2026 — 33,136 subscribers29 August 2026 — 33,134 subscribers31 August 2026 — 33,132 subscribers1 September 2026 — 33,130 subscribers3 September 2026 — 33,126 subscribers5 September 2026 — 33,123 subscribers8 September 2026 — 33,121 subscribers11 September 2026 — 33,118 subscribers13 September 2026 — 33,113 subscribers14 September 2026 — 33,110 subscribers16 September 2026 — 33,105 subscribers18 September 2026 — 33,096 subscribers25 September 2026 — 33,080 subscribers4 October 2026 — 27,558 subscribers8 October 2026 — 27,546 subscribers12 October 2026 — 27,539 subscribers14 October 2026 — 27,534 subscribers15 October 2026 — 27,532 subscribers16 October 2026 — 27,530 subscribers17 October 2026 — 27,526 subscribers18 October 2026 — 27,524 subscribers19 October 2026 — 27,517 subscribers20 October 2026 — 27,516 subscribers21 October 2026 — 27,515 subscribers22 October 2026 — 18,150 subscribers24 October 2026 — 10,497 subscribers25 October 2026 — 10,494 subscribers27 October 2026 — 10,490 subscribers28 October 2026 — 10,488 subscribers29 October 2026 — 7,359 subscribers31 October 2026 — 5,484 subscribers4 November 2026 — 5,477 subscribers7 August 20264 November 2026
44 measurements spanning 88 days, net -27,674. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,326–37,302 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 44
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Nov 2026, 00:265,477-7
31 Oct 2026, 21:195,484-1,875
29 Oct 2026, 01:087,359-3,129
28 Oct 2026, 02:4710,488-2
27 Oct 2026, 01:1710,490-4
25 Oct 2026, 03:2510,494-3
24 Oct 2026, 01:5010,497-7,653
22 Oct 2026, 22:3918,150-9,365
21 Oct 2026, 23:1627,515-1
20 Oct 2026, 21:3727,516-1
19 Oct 2026, 17:5827,517-7
18 Oct 2026, 15:5727,524-2
17 Oct 2026, 15:3827,526-4
16 Oct 2026, 12:3527,530-2
15 Oct 2026, 14:4627,532-2
14 Oct 2026, 13:2827,534-5
12 Oct 2026, 23:0527,539-7
8 Oct 2026, 14:0127,546-12
4 Oct 2026, 02:3727,558-5,522
25 Sept 2026, 07:2133,080first reading

Engagement

1,039 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 132 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.018%
avg views ÷ 5,477 subscribers
Avg views / post
1.0
298 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
298
of 1,039 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 October 2026
Posts held1,039 (6 August 2026 – 22 October 2026)
Views total298
Reactions total—
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken22 Oct 2026, 20:07 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
5h 17m
Average length
1m 48s

Measured directly from 177 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Advertising

Ad load
0.6%
6 of 1,000 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
0
none — marked by hashtag only
Median views · ads
1.0
over 6 measured posts
Median views · rest
1.0
over 994 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. They are printed side by side with the count behind each rather than as a ratio: an ad and an ordinary post are not otherwise matched — for topic, for length, for hour of day — so the gap between them is a description of two groups and not the effect of one being an ad.

Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 11 August 2026 to 22 October 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 4 of 298 posts held from the last 30 days (1.34%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

22 Oct 2026, 20:02 UTC1 viewsread 22 October 2026
Photo

Today’s calendar focusses on UK retail sales figures, followed by S&P Global manufacturing and services PMIs for the eurozone, the UK, and the US. #FPMarkets

22 Oct 2026, 19:44 UTC1 viewsread 22 October 2026
Photo

NEW: 🟠 Bitcoin dominance climbs past 60%, the highest in 5 months! New capital continues to flow into BTC. Source: https://x.com/BitcoinMagazine/status/2113329130326671464

22 Oct 2026, 19:09 UTC1 viewsread 22 October 2026
Photo

🚨 BREAKING: Meta default insurance hits a record high 🔹 $META 5-year credit default swaps at 114.5 bps, an all-time high (Markit data) 🔹 Insuring $10M of Meta debt now costs about $114,500 a year 💰 @money

22 Oct 2026, 19:01 UTC1 viewsread 22 October 2026
Photo

🇺🇸 BREAKING: TRUMP calls Elon Musk, asks him to reverse Starlink restrictions on Ukraine — WSJ 🔹 Trump reportedly voiced frustration over the Starlink slowdown, which US officials say Musk ordered 🔹 US lawmakers now demanding an inquiry into SpaceX's role in Ukraine's defense 💰 @money

22 Oct 2026, 18:51 UTC1 viewsread 22 October 2026
Photo

XRP has reached the support zone, just like BTC, and I expect to see a reversal and a fill of the imbalances above. Let’s open this trade ⬇️ ✅Entry price: 1.3024 📌Target: 1.3160 / 1.3625 / 1.4125 ❌Stop: 1.2491

22 Oct 2026, 18:35 UTC1 viewsread 22 October 2026
Video

BULLISH: 🇺🇸 U.S. Spot Bitcoin ETFs saw $528 million in inflows yesterday. Source: https://x.com/BitcoinMagazine/status/2113305519658033463

22 Oct 2026, 18:22 UTC1 viewsread 22 October 2026
Photo

⚡️ BREAKING: a16z drops "crypto" from its flagship fund — now "a16z Frontier" 🔹 Mandate widens beyond crypto to broader frontier tech 🔹 Chris Dixon: firm will keep investing in crypto & pushing for sensible regulation 💰 @money

22 Oct 2026, 17:13 UTC1 viewsread 22 October 2026
Photo

DEVLEOPING: 🇨🇦 A proposed class action has been filed in Canada against COLDCARD maker Coinkite and co-founders Rodolfo Novak and Peter D. Gray. The lawsuit alleges they knew about the wallet’s seed-generation flaw as early as May 2025 and failed to warn users. Roughly $116 MILLION in Bitcoin was stolen after the vulnerability was exploited. Source: https://x.com/SimplyBitcoin/status/2113290304245899611

22 Oct 2026, 15:07 UTC1 viewsread 22 October 2026
Photo

BREAKING: 🟠 Visa aims for a big crypto expansion, in talks to buy Fireblocks for $2.5B — Axios • 2,000+ clients including BNY and Revolut • NYDFS-regulated qualified custodian Source: https://x.com/BitcoinArchive/status/2113252357014274398

22 Oct 2026, 14:07 UTC1 viewsread 22 October 2026
Video

JUST IN: 🇦🇪 Robinhood has been approved by the Dubai Financial Services Authority to launch Bitcoin and digital asset trading in the Middle East 🚀 Source: https://x.com/BitcoinMagazine/status/2113269952601862167

22 Oct 2026, 13:31 UTC1 viewsread 22 October 2026
Photo

JUST IN: 🇺🇸 U.S. Spot Bitcoin ETFs have seen $1.07 billion in inflows so far this week 🚀 Source: https://x.com/BitcoinMagazine/status/2113221938659369357

22 Oct 2026, 12:04 UTC1 viewsread 22 October 2026
Video

JUST IN: 🟠 Strive's Jeff Walton said, "This is a #Bitcoin gold rush. We're all trying to accumulate as much BTC as humanly possible." "We know we're in a debt crisis, they're going to print more money, and we want to be at the forefront of the new monetary ecosystem." "We are attracting new capital from different pools to the market, and that fundamentally changes how BTC will operate in the future." Source: https…

Showing the 12 most recent of 1,039 posts we hold for @Soldi_fals1o. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@Soldi_fals1o edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
22 September 2026
Most recent edit
10 October 2026

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“SOLDI BANCONOTE” (@Soldi_fals1o), 5,477 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Soldi_fals1o.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.