Channel
@SooRaTijaN
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
5,700subscribers
-142 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001414598842 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @SooRaTijaN |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 23 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 7 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/SooRaTijaN |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 67% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Nov 2026, 02:19 | 5,700 | -1 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 22:06 | 5,701 | -18 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 11:21 | 5,719 | -12 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 13:30 | 5,731 | -15 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 06:06 | 5,746 | -7 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 03:19 | 5,753 | -11 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 17:36 | 5,764 | -7 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 11:58 | 5,771 | -17 |
| 7 Oct 2026, 11:02 | 5,788 | -13 |
| 30 Sept 2026, 09:57 | 5,801 | -45 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 05:16 | 5,846 | -12 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 05:20 | 5,858 | -8 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 16:56 | 5,866 | -17 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 12:26 | 5,883 | -4 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 17:44 | 5,887 | +1 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 07:08 | 5,886 | +2 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 13:17 | 5,884 | +7 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 17:38 | 5,877 | +18 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 05:18 | 5,859 | +16 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 06:43 | 5,843 | first reading |
38 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 11 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 38 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
189 reactions across 29 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 93.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 176 | 93.1% | |
| 👍 | 6 | 3.17% | |
| 💔 | 6 | 3.17% | |
| 💘 | 1 | 0.529% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 34 of the 38 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 228 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 38 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
آیه های مخصوص جذب ثروت و پولدار شدن @AyeZekr 💶💚 ذکرهای‌مجرب جذبِ‌همسـر مناسب و صالح @AyeZekr 👰🏻♀🤍 ╼࣪ ━╼࣪ ━╼࣪ ━╼━╼࣪ ━╼࣪ ━╼࣪ ━╼࣪ ━╼࣪ ┏𖧹🥩آموزش آشپزی رایگان ┛ᒍ ᝪ I ᑎ ┏𖧹🪴کتاب موزیک شعر ┛ᒍ ᝪ I ᑎ ┏𖧹📠جملات مفهومی ┛ᒍ ᝪ I ᑎ ┏𖧹🔰رسالت من عشقه ┛ᒍ ᝪ I ᑎ ┏𖧹🍿سریال ترکی ┛ᒍ ᝪ I ᑎ ┏𖧹😊رفع افسردگی ┛ᒍ ᝪ I ᑎ ┏𖧹😋آموزش غذاهای خوشمزه ┛ᒍ ᝪ I ᑎ ┏𖧹💍عاشقتم دلبر ┛ᒍ ᝪ I ᑎ ┏𖧹🖤 سه نقطه ┛ᒍ ᝪ I ᑎ ┏𖧹📓کپشنِ قشنڳ! ┛ᒍ ᝪ I ᑎ ┏𖧹🌚تڪخطی | 𝙈𝙊𝙊𝘿 ┛ᒍ ᝪ I ᑎ ┏𖧹🍋تکس…
﹝صورتی جآن💞﹞ pinned «عده‌ای می‌گویند من بسیار مهربانم! و عده‌ای می‌گویند، بسیار بدخلقم و ناجور! هر دو را باور کن، چون هرکسی نسخه‌ای از مرا دیده که لیاقتش را داشته... 🫶🏻»
اعتقادم این است که وقتی همه چیز سخت میشود ... 🩶
❤6
هیچ غمی اونقدر بزرگ نیست که نتونی دوباره لبخند بزنی :) 🫂
❤4
عده‌ای می‌گویند من بسیار مهربانم! و عده‌ای می‌گویند، بسیار بدخلقم و ناجور! هر دو را باور کن، چون هرکسی نسخه‌ای از مرا دیده که لیاقتش را داشته... 🫶🏻
❤4
آیه های مخصوص جذب ثروت و پولدار شدن @AyeZekr 💶💚 ذکرهای‌مجرب جذبِ‌همسـر مناسب و صالح @AyeZekr 👰🏻♀🤍 ᨳـــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــᨳ ᨳ🐢پروکسی 𝗩𝗣𝗡 ˓ ִֶָ ࣪@proxyporsoat ᨳ🧚خیاطی آسان ˓ ִֶָ ࣪@Artmoden ᨳ🌾آهنگ های نوستالژی ˓ ִֶָ ࣪@Avaykhatere ᨳ🫑آهنگشاد 𝟮𝟬𝟮5 ˓ ִֶָ ࣪@music_remixshad ᨳ🍋🟩 یک حبه نـور ˓ ִֶָ ࣪@AyehayRoshana ᨳ💚جملات کوتاه و مفهومی ˓ ִֶָ ࣪@jomalatetakkhati ᨳـــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــ…
ارزششو داره به جنگیدن ادامه بده 💯
❤3
مشکل اینجا بود که کنار می‌آمدیم! رنجمان می‌دادند، کنار می‌آمدیم، درکمان نمی‌کردند، کنار می‌آمدیم، احترام نمی‌گذاشتند، کنار می‌آمدیم، ارزش قائل نمی‌شدند، کنار می‌آمدیم. آنقدر گذشتیم و کنار آمدیم و سازگار شدیم، که عادت ما شد کنار آمدن و عادت آدم‌های مقابلِ ما شد؛ اهمیت ندادن و کنار گذاشتن! مقصر، پدران و مادران ما بودند! باید مطالبه‌گر و متوقع بارمان می‌آوردند، باید از همان ابتدا، زیر میز زدن را یادمان می‌دادند! 🩶 #نرگ…
💔5❤3
الهی زندگیت؛ از این رو به اون رو بشه! ❤️🔥
❤6
3 راهکار چربی‌سوزی شکم و پهلو @Fitandam 🥬🍵 دارو گیاهی مخصوص کاهش وزن @Fitandam 💊😍 ════════════════ 🧸୧اینسـتای باکلاس @iNteRvaAl 🪴୧کپشن ادبی @cafesiiah 📠୧جملات مفهومی @jomalatetakkhati 😊୧رفع افسردگی @arameshe_darooon 🍿𐰢سریال ترکی ؛@filmturkki 🧨𐰢فاز تیکه دار ؛@Teext_post 🦋𐰢پــروفــآیـل بـهـآر ؛@NabatNevis 💍𐰢یاࢪجانـم ؛@layan_graph 📓୧کپشنِ قشنگ @patoghe_mon 🌚୧بیو | تڪخطی @myroozmaregi 🎥୧ آموزش اینستاگرام @kiarostami_onli…
چقد قشنگ بود 😭🫶🏻💚 بسپر دست خودش ^^
❤11
- دلِ امیدوار، هرگز تنها نمےماند ❤️🔥
❤4
Showing the 12 most recent of 38 posts we hold for @SooRaTijaN. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
We recorded 4 posts on @SooRaTijaN as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
Named by 110 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@SooRaTijaN named 7 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“﹝صورتی جآن💞﹞” (@SooRaTijaN), 5,700 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SooRaTijaN.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.