Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Sophie Alric

Channel

Sophie Alric

@SophieAlric

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

981subscribers

+845 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004293322764
TypeChannel
Username@SophieAlric
CreatedBetween 1 May 2026 and 31 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/SophieAlric

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 59% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

136981558.57 August 2026 — 136 subscribers7 August 2026 — 272 subscribers8 August 2026 — 272 subscribers16 August 2026 — 662 subscribers24 August 2026 — 843 subscribers30 August 2026 — 880 subscribers9 September 2026 — 910 subscribers17 September 2026 — 981 subscribers7 August 202617 September 2026
8 measurements spanning 42 days, net +845. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9–1,108 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 20:19981+71
9 Sept 2026, 15:35910+30
30 Aug 2026, 19:17880+37
24 Aug 2026, 11:23843+181
16 Aug 2026, 07:48662+390
8 Aug 2026, 08:47272no change
7 Aug 2026, 23:24272+136
7 Aug 2026, 02:02136first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1h 34m
Average length
9m 28s

Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

243 reactions across 20 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤14660.1%
👍6727.6%
🙏124.94%
🔥104.12%
👏52.06%
🕊20.823%
🤝10.412%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 243 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 11:07 UTC219 views37 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

CENSURE EN FRANCE et... LUMIÈRE DANS LES TÉNÈBRES Après avoir été bannie le 6 mai 2026 Par un juge des libertés De LinkedIn, YouTube et Tiktok Je communiquais sur Instagram et Facebook Mes vidéos sont freinées, voire saccagées Je continue et republie Et grâce à vous qui sollicitiez mes articles Et un résistant devenu un proche conseiller J’ai ouvert un canal sur telegram https://t.me/SophieAlric Cerise sur le gâte…

❤27🔥4👏3🕊2🤝1

6 Aug 2026, 17:52 UTC282 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Il y a des sommaires à la fin de tous mes rapports et synthèses...je suis scientifique de formation, habituée à réaliser des bibliographies...cela peut surprendre les professionnels du monde judiciaire mais c'est bien pratique 😅

👍13❤2

6 Aug 2026, 17:50 UTC320 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
File

Ce rapport, majeur car il illustre en tous points le contrôle coercitif, comporte quatre partie : 1-Comportement du père tel un pédocriminel comme décrit dans le rapport de la CIIVISE I / 2- Dangerosité des experts d'obédience psychanalytique / 3- Existence d'un réseau qui protège les pédocriminels à Toulouse / 4 - Sous le regard du Contrôle Coercitif (et là, on comprend TOUT !).

👍9❤1🔥1

6 Aug 2026, 17:22 UTC280 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
File

Première publication sur mon programme en novembre 2025 (en fait la première s'intitulait "j'accuse"... elle a été censurée 🤷‍♀️)

👍5❤4

6 Aug 2026, 17:20 UTC257 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
File

Le contrôle coercitif, c'est quoi ? J'ai fait la lecture de cet article, en deux vidéos sur Instagram et fb, vous m'en demandiez le texte, le voici 😉

👍6❤1🔥1

6 Aug 2026, 17:16 UTC240 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Je continue tant que j'y suis... et que je peux, vous lirez à votre rythme et selon vos envies 😉. N'oubliez pas de diffuser, en citant mon nom et prénom svp 🙏✨

👍8❤1🔥1

6 Aug 2026, 17:14 UTC236 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
File

Après cet tentative d'internement avortée, ils m'ont mise en garde à vue et placée sous contrôle judiciaire. Je me bats seule depuis fin décembre 2024, j'ai plaidé seule en correctionnelle, le 12 février 2026, sans mon dossier que j'avais demandé trois fois au procureur. Refus systématiques. La procureure a sorti du chapeau une expertise frauduleuse en fallacieuse, réalisée par une complice de mon ex beau père, une p…

👍8❤2🔥1

6 Aug 2026, 17:09 UTC210 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
File

L'article sur leur première semi-réussite d'internement, le 16 mai 2025 : les ambulanciers m'embarquent de force vers les urgences psychiatriques de l'hôpital Purpan, Toulouse. Cette fois-ci, la psychiatre de garde était intègre, je suis sortie au bout de 12 heures avec un diagnostic d'état de stress post traumatique mais un avertissement "ils vont recommencer". J'ai été internée sous contrainte et droguée de force a…

❤11

6 Aug 2026, 17:05 UTC199 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Et maintenant que j'ai trouvé le moyen de vous envoyer mes documents en pdf. préparez-vous au festin 😁

❤10🙏4

6 Aug 2026, 17:04 UTC195 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
File

Et hop, un deuxième...rien à faire, j'ai la langue bien pendue 😂

❤10👏2

6 Aug 2026, 17:03 UTC193 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
File

Sur le thème de la censure, voici un article que j'ai publié sur linkedIn qui fut censuré...je crois que les tyrans n'aiment pas mon style 😅

❤10

6 Aug 2026, 15:44 UTC209 views28 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Vidéos saccagées, articles censurés Interview sur chaîne publique (Mike Borowsky - Radio Courtoisie) censuré par l’ARCOM Contrôle judiciaire qui m’interdit L’ACCÈS en TOTALITÉ Des réseaux YOUTUBE, LINKEDIN et TIKTOK Au point que le Juge des Libertés et Détention M’a menacée de prison Si j’allais voir une vidéo sur YouTube Sur TikTok Ou lisais un article sur LinkedIn Alors que c’est mon espace de travail En tant qu’e…

❤21👍6🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @SophieAlric. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Sophie Alric” (@SophieAlric), 981 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SophieAlric.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.