Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 𝐒𝐏𝐈𝐃𝐄𝐑 𝐋𝐈𝐋𝐘

Channel

𝐒𝐏𝐈𝐃𝐄𝐑 𝐋𝐈𝐋𝐘

@Spider_LilyV

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,149subscribers

+386 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003268501733
TypeChannel
Username@Spider_LilyV
CreatedBetween 1 October 2025 and 31 January 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Spider_LilyV

Topic

Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 68% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

7631,1499567 August 2026 — 763 subscribers8 August 2026 — 763 subscribers16 August 2026 — 826 subscribers24 August 2026 — 882 subscribers1 September 2026 — 962 subscribers9 September 2026 — 1,049 subscribers13 September 2026 — 1,089 subscribers17 September 2026 — 1,149 subscribers7 August 202617 September 2026
8 measurements spanning 41 days, net +386. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 705–1,207 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 11:401,149+60
13 Sept 2026, 13:391,089+40
9 Sept 2026, 17:551,049+87
1 Sept 2026, 02:46962+80
24 Aug 2026, 18:58882+56
16 Aug 2026, 06:26826+63
8 Aug 2026, 01:50763no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:45763first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 7 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

33 reactions across 5 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💋927.3%
❤‍🔥618.2%
👻618.2%
💘515.2%
🥰412.1%
🍓26.06%
13.03%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 33 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 01:34 UTC10 viewsread 8 August 2026

Парные фото Эвы и Сета, ии часто делает Сета похожим на женщину из-за длинных волос, либо вовсе женщиной.. Естественно легких путей не ищем.

8 Aug 2026, 01:33 UTC10 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @AnonAskBot

💬 У тебя новое анонимное сообщение! с кем сложнее всего делать работы? из персонажей ⬅️ Свайпни для ответа.

8 Aug 2026, 00:27 UTC26 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Как раз скоро выложу фоточки с Сетом и Эвой.

💋2💘2❤‍🔥1

8 Aug 2026, 00:25 UTC28 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

На всякий случай проясню, это просто для ваших личных заказов, канал продолжает работать, как работал до этого!🐱

💋3💘31

7 Aug 2026, 23:55 UTC41 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ На одного персонажа: ⭐️Портрет(по пояс, только лицо, простой фон) — 50 звёзд/ 100 руб. ⭐️Полурост(до бедер, простой фон) — 70 звёзд/ 150 руб ⭐️Полный рост(персонаж целиком, простой фон) — 100 звёзд/ 200 руб ⭐️Сцена/Сложная композиция(Сложная поза или детальный фон/образ) — 150 звёзд/ 300 руб ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ ⭐️Дополнительный персонаж на фото + 20звёзд/ 50 руб ⭐️Детализация фона +10 звёзд/ 20

🥰4❤‍🔥2💋1

7 Aug 2026, 23:42 UTC38 viewsread 8 August 2026

Я использую платного бота, да, но там можно звездами оплачивать.

7 Aug 2026, 23:42 UTC37 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @AnonAskBot

💬 У тебя новое анонимное сообщение! Платный ии? ⬅️ Свайпни для ответа.

7 Aug 2026, 23:30 UTC42 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @AnonAskBot

💬 У тебя новое анонимное сообщение! Где вы делаете обнажённые фото персонажей? Уже множество ии испробовала, никакой не делает ⬅️ Свайпни для ответа.

7 Aug 2026, 23:25 UTC42 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @AnonAskBot

💬 У тебя новое анонимное сообщение! А если нет возможности оплатить звездами, можно добавить оплату в рублях? ⬅️ Свайпни для ответа.

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Spider_LilyV. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝐒𝐏𝐈𝐃𝐄𝐑 𝐋𝐈𝐋𝐘” (@Spider_LilyV), 1,149 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Spider_LilyV.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.