Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Sport Bad ir

Channel

Sport Bad ir

@SportBadir

On this record: Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

17,076subscribers

+9,453 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003426397552
TypeChannel
Username@SportBadir
CreatedBetween 1 November 2025 and 31 March 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 September 2026
Measurements held23
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/SportBadir

Previous handles

@SportBadir was previously reachable at this handle, before switching to its current one. This says nothing about who or what answers at the old handle today — only that this channel no longer does.

@Tractorsorkh
held 6 August 20266 August 2026

Growth

6,99217,07612,0346 August 2026 — 7,623 subscribers6 August 2026 — 7,610 subscribers9 August 2026 — 7,550 subscribers12 August 2026 — 7,493 subscribers15 August 2026 — 6,992 subscribers16 August 2026 — 8,985 subscribers17 August 2026 — 10,672 subscribers18 August 2026 — 11,666 subscribers19 August 2026 — 12,214 subscribers20 August 2026 — 13,237 subscribers21 August 2026 — 13,457 subscribers23 August 2026 — 13,696 subscribers25 August 2026 — 14,652 subscribers26 August 2026 — 14,785 subscribers27 August 2026 — 15,123 subscribers28 August 2026 — 15,618 subscribers29 August 2026 — 15,770 subscribers30 August 2026 — 16,010 subscribers31 August 2026 — 16,052 subscribers1 September 2026 — 15,997 subscribers2 September 2026 — 16,304 subscribers4 September 2026 — 16,363 subscribers6 September 2026 — 17,076 subscribers6 August 20266 September 2026
23 measurements spanning 31 days, net +9,453. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,479–18,589 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 23
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Sept 2026, 14:5517,076+713
4 Sept 2026, 06:2116,363+59
2 Sept 2026, 21:4616,304+307
1 Sept 2026, 16:4715,997-55
31 Aug 2026, 16:0416,052+42
30 Aug 2026, 12:4316,010+240
29 Aug 2026, 11:1715,770+152
28 Aug 2026, 08:0415,618+495
27 Aug 2026, 04:4415,123+338
26 Aug 2026, 04:3414,785+133
25 Aug 2026, 01:3514,652+956
23 Aug 2026, 12:4713,696+239
21 Aug 2026, 23:5413,457+220
20 Aug 2026, 15:1213,237+1,023
19 Aug 2026, 15:0812,214+548
18 Aug 2026, 14:1311,666+994
17 Aug 2026, 16:0910,672+1,687
16 Aug 2026, 21:308,985+1,993
15 Aug 2026, 19:166,992-501
12 Aug 2026, 17:167,493first reading

Engagement

528 posts held, back to 25 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 42 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
30.0%
avg views ÷ 17,076 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,110
515 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.52%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
516
of 528 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 497 of 515 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026
Posts held528 (25 July 20263 September 2026)
Views total2,633,932
Reactions total65,418
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 09:57 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1h 58m
Average length
50s

Measured directly from 142 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

65,438 reactions across 501 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤣32,87250.2%
11,96618.3%
🔥9,94315.2%
👍4,7437.25%
💔2,1643.31%
👎1,4432.21%
😡1,1071.69%
😐8701.33%
👏3120.477%
😢180.028%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 503 of the 528 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 65,438 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 528 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 527 we hold a reading for · 0.4%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @SportBadir. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 528 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 25 July 2026 to 3 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

3 Sept 2026, 09:27 UTC548 views50 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

اعتراض مدیررسانه‌ای پرسپولیس به داوری دربی 🤩 @SportBadir

🤣39👍11

3 Sept 2026, 09:26 UTC577 viewsread 3 September 2026
Photo

🦖 با اولین واریز، بیشتر دریافت کن! فقط در سایت جهانی TrexBet 🦖 بسته خوش‌آمدگویی ویژه TrexBet تا ۱۰۰٪ بونوس واریز 🦖 تا ۱۵۰ چرخش رایگان در ۴ واریز اول 🥇 واریز اول: ۱۰۰٪ بونوس + ۳۰ چرخش رایگان 🥈 واریز دوم: ۵۰٪ بونوس + ۳۵ چرخش رایگان 🥉 واریز سوم: ۲۵٪ بونوس + ۴۰ چرخش رایگان 🏅 واریز چهارم: ۲۵٪ بونوس + ۴۵ چرخش رایگان 🦖🦖🦖🦖🦖🦖 TREXBET — PLAY. PREDICT. WIN. https://TrexBet.com T.me/TrexBet_Ir

3 Sept 2026, 09:26 UTC577 viewsread 3 September 2026
File

🦖 اپلیکیشن رسمی و بدون فیلترینگ TrexBet 📝 ورود و ثبت‌نام سریع ⚡ سریع، حرفه‌ای و همیشه در دسترس!

3 Sept 2026, 08:54 UTC≈1,030 views44 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

⚽️⚽️👤👤 • واکنش اینستاگرامی مربیان استقلال و پرسپولیس بعد دربی: 🤩 @SportBadir

33🔥5😐4👍1👎1

3 Sept 2026, 08:04 UTC≈1,420 views131 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

واکنش محمد عمری به سوال خبرنگار که میگه مشکلی نداری استقلالی ها هم باهاتون عکس میگیرن : 🤩 @SportBadir

👏1264🔥1

3 Sept 2026, 07:42 UTC≈1,650 views139 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

⚽️🔴کامنت مونیر برای یاسر آسانی: «به تو گفته بودم گل میزنی 🤪🔥» 🤩 @SportBadir

95🤣37💔6😡1

3 Sept 2026, 06:09 UTC≈1,970 views73 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

بازی دوستانه یعنی این نه روسیه و ازبکستان 🇧🇷🇯🇵رسمی؛ تیم ملی برزیل قبل جام ملتهای آسیا با ژاپن و سنگاپور بازی دوستانه برگزار می‌کنه👍 🤩 @SportBadir

59👍8💔6

3 Sept 2026, 05:38 UTC≈2,060 views136 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

⚽️🔵استوری های پژمان ماندگاری (مدیر رسانه ای استقلال): «بدون شرح؛ بدون کارت، فوتباله دیگه» 🤩 @SportBadir

👍107🤣19👎81😐1

2 Sept 2026, 21:59 UTC≈2,640 views1 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

🦖 فقط یک بازی از میکس‌ت لوز شده؟ پولت برمی‌گرده! میکس می‌بندی، هیجان بالا میره، اما یکی از انتخاب‌هات خراب می‌شه؟ با پیشنهاد ویژه TrexBet، در صورت رعایت شرایط، می‌تونی ۱۰۰٪ مبلغ شرطت رو پس بگیری. همین الان وارد سایت شو و شرایط آسان‌ش رو مطالعه کن! 💰 🦖🦖🦖🦖 🦖 بونوس صدرصدی اولین واریز 🦖 واریز آسان، برداشت سریع 🦖 سرعت بالا، طراحی حرفه ای و تجربه ای متفاوت https://TrexBet.com T.me/TrexBet_Ir

👎1

2 Sept 2026, 21:59 UTC≈2,600 views1 reactionsread 3 September 2026
File

🦖 اپلیکیشن رسمی و بدون فیلترینگ TrexBet 📝 ورود و ثبت‌نام سریع ⚡ سریع، حرفه‌ای و همیشه در دسترس!

👎1

2 Sept 2026, 21:13 UTC≈3,250 views394 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

پششششششششمام ⚽️⚽️ استقلال و پرسپولیس امروز در مجموع 33 شوت زدن که 9 تاش تو چهارچوب بود! 🔴 ازتون ممنونیم اسطوره های مربیگری 💀 🤩 @SportBadir

301🤣85🔥6👎2

2 Sept 2026, 20:51 UTC≈3,520 views320 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

⚽️⚽️🎙صالح حردانی: من شدیداً رئالیم این که میگید شبیه رافینیا شدم خواستم بگم من شبیه کسی نیستم 😁 🤩 @SportBadir

🤣257🔥557👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 528 posts we hold for @SportBadir. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@SportBadir edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
20 August 2026
Most recent edit
27 August 2026

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

1 Sept 2026, 22:07 UTCAnonymous Poll703 voters

نتیجه دربی فردا

  1. 🏅 برد پرسپولیس43%
  2. 🟰 مساوی15%
  3. 🏅 برد استقلال42%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 528 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 3 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Sport Bad ir” (@SportBadir), 17,076 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SportBadir.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.