tg banned my account for no reason back in 2021, now I banned them from the apple store, trust
👍4🤣1🤯1

Channel
@SquidGambles
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
1,189subscribers
+10 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001740207435 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @SquidGambles |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 12 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/SquidGambles |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 90% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 12:21 | 1,189 | -1 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 16:36 | 1,190 | +1 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 05:37 | 1,189 | +7 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 10:18 | 1,182 | +3 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 05:57 | 1,179 | +5 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 10:38 | 1,174 | -1 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 14:49 | 1,175 | -1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 22:05 | 1,176 | +1 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 13:36 | 1,175 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 11:23 | 1,176 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:42 | 1,177 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:45 | 1,179 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 7 March 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
451 reactions across 19 posts, in 29 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 146 | 32.4% | |
| ❤ | 124 | 27.5% | |
| 👀 | 28 | 6.21% | |
| 🤣 | 27 | 5.99% | |
| 😁 | 20 | 4.43% | |
| 👍 | 19 | 4.21% | |
| 🤯 | 12 | 2.66% | |
| 🤩 | 11 | 2.44% | |
| 🍾 | 8 | 1.77% | |
| 🤡 | 7 | 1.55% | |
| ❤🔥 | 6 | 1.33% | |
| 💩 | 6 | 1.33% | |
| 🖕 | 6 | 1.33% | |
| ⚡ | 4 | 0.887% | |
| 💯 | 4 | 0.887% | |
| 🍌 | 3 | 0.665% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 0.665% | |
| 🏆 | 2 | 0.443% | |
| 🐳 | 2 | 0.443% | |
| 👎 | 2 | 0.443% | |
| 9 further kinds | 11 | 2.44% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 451 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 March 2024 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
tg banned my account for no reason back in 2021, now I banned them from the apple store, trust
👍4🤣1🤯1
my twitter algo is great, gm
😁8🔥3🍌1
Lol, make sure to leave old small groups. Some random ass group from 2022 called Sol Anal, the owner left and I automatically randomly got transferred owner. Now I have to deal with a copyright strike?
😁10❤1
Hello, this is Telegram Support. Representatives of Coinbase, Layer Zero, Tools for Humanity, Phantom, Galxe, Kraken, Trip Advisor and Backpack Exchange made a complaint https://t.me/solanalbsc is infringing on their copyright. We kindly ask you to contact the copyright holder via email [email protected] to resolve the matter.
Not getting paid to post this btw, just wanted to drop a lil stimmy for squiggas. The bot is genuinely useful and if you like it, I'll giveaway what I get from refs. Never sold out and never will, I don't need to
❤14
$1000 giveaway, read below squiggas I've been using this bot and it works multichain, without bridging. U can deposit SOL, for example, and buy on ETH or Robinhood, etc. Saves you from fading when new chains pop up and you're lazy to bridge. Very cool tech. Also, gas fees are free. Use my ref and respond with "done". I'll randomly give 50 of you $20, but first I will check if you actually signed up lol, might ta…
❤21🖕6💩2🤡2
Hachiko is still going strong. Almost hit 4 mil today. Got entry on the weekend dips and still holding my bags. Feels good to have a longterm BSC hold.
🔥28❤7💯4❤🔥3🐳2⚡1🌚1🏆1
Maybe should've saved this for the bullrun instead, but some might find it useful https://x.com/0xFrontman/status/2044862610458497193
🔥8👏3❤2🤝1
Devs are delivering, new tech yesterday, buybacks and burns, donations are going out. Good chance to dca, or get an entry. Also something that people failed to notice, is that the giving block (the crypto payment platform for nonprofits) is actively engaging with them, so maybe they get some good partnerships soon Chart: https://dexscreener.com/solana/9uwcgxdy7zvkq5zywf5h11t3opvd5cy2xufthjq2new3
❤6
Bitrock dev just launched, previous project did 1500x for us. Catch whatever entry you want, I don't want to wait for a dip to share X: https://x.com/unigivetoken CA: CkJgoT1YcPqWdjUbvqgPf5BDwvq2GeBX7REG9TCCpump
❤7👍2
Will look for an entry here on this weekend dip on Hachiko. The community and dev reminds me of the 2021 bullrun type and its on BSC. I legit haven't seen so many legit retail moonboys in a single coin since back then They're tryna be the next shib, but on BSC. Let's see how BSC treats us Chart: https://dexscreener.com/bsc/0xe6edc555061d1d9fe0145867b7ea7b07da840898 TG: https://t.me/hachiko_bnb_chat
🔥33❤7⚡3❤🔥2🤩2😁2🏆1😇1
Monad has been goood for us, we printed today in the lounge. Early to everything. I kicked some inactives, 5 people can join. Here: https://t.me/+mamTP82CM5w1NjA0 Also, follow me on X: https://x.com/0xFrontman
❤10
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @SquidGambles. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@SquidGambles named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Squid Gambles” (@SquidGambles), 1,189 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SquidGambles.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.