Channel
@Stacksendors
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
918subscribers
-6 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002163330266 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Stacksendors |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Stacksendors |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Sept 2026, 13:18 | 918 | +3 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 04:45 | 915 | -6 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 14:58 | 921 | -3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:00 | 924 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:59 | 924 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 26 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
24 reactions across 8 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 8 | 33.3% | |
| 👍 | 6 | 25.0% | |
| 🔥 | 5 | 20.8% | |
| 🙏 | 2 | 8.33% | |
| 🤬 | 2 | 8.33% | |
| 🍌 | 1 | 4.17% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 24 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Sharing for a friend who is hiring: We're hiring: Crypto Casino Reporter FairGambling is the layer of trust on top of online gaming. We review, compare and rate the platforms players actually use. Now we're looking for a reporter to lead our on-chain data/investigations coverage. What you'll do: • Deep-dive investigations built on on-chain data • Break news first • Deliver polished, sharp content you'd want to re…
Osiris dev keeps building, been ranging around here for a while. Imo its inevitable. Palantir pumped 100b yesterday and the on-chain open source palantir is at 120k 2nZNHm3Lr9umG3DVrzYwHgktwkuKuJRXqqRqs3ewpump
❤4
https://x.com/soulsimplifai/status/2084723242061688992?s=20
x402 on solana talking about them
earnfi killing it as usual
🙏2
https://x.com/x402/status/2084250764269289645
As I’m sure everyone has read. Coldcard had a vulnerability on their RNG seed generator. Over 1000 btc stolen from seed phrases through no fault of their own. It’s a sad situation to be in. Take your OPSEC seriously, even hardware wallets are not safe. I would recommend generating your own seed phrases via dice roll + generating a passphrase as well. Don’t lose all your hard work to an OPSEC failure.
👍4
Some metrics for the people that are still in HODL culture : Only tokens above 1m created in july on solana , 50% are probably real ones with real vol, the rest in the picture are cabal slop bundles. Keep in mind this was a good month for solana compared w the last 3-6months. Of course theres gonna be narratives that will eventually break ceilings, but you will win more long term if you are a jeet or dont hold for …
❤2👍2
Photo, posted without a caption
Also, don’t expect multiple X’s on these. These are decent sized plays good for 3-4x’s Especially $CRED
❤2🤬2
Both projects have a difference in FDV and circulating mcap Some supply locked by metadao behind metrics As usual DYOR, don’t expect these to be quick pumps expect to hold these for a few months
$RAWR - buying a fossilised RWA They’re trying to buy a dinosaur skeleton Solana seems to be soft shilling. Pumped heavy recently on a small retrace Would suggest looking for entry FDV is around 1.4m atm CA - 4K1m7gAMDKzrxQn68yuZAd767w57Fw7Ykw69dG3umeta
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Stacksendors. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Stacks Sendors” (@Stacksendors), 918 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Stacksendors.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.