Channel
@StereoManAR
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
69subscribers
+32 since we began measuring on 27 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004311754111 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @StereoManAR |
| Created | Between 1 June 2026 and 19 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 27 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 4 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/StereoManAR |
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 28 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 29 Oct 2026, 12:28 | 69 | +1 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 08:31 | 68 | +2 |
| 6 Oct 2026, 19:15 | 66 | +1 |
| 25 Sept 2026, 18:22 | 65 | +16 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 12:20 | 49 | +10 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 04:43 | 39 | +2 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 11:45 | 37 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 19 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
44 reactions across 14 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 11 | 25.0% | |
| 🔥 | 8 | 18.2% | |
| 🤩 | 8 | 18.2% | |
| 😁 | 7 | 15.9% | |
| ❤ | 6 | 13.6% | |
| 👌 | 2 | 4.55% | |
| 🤔 | 2 | 4.55% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 44 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 19 August 2026 to 27 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Технологический Болт Генона подарил проекту уникальную возможность продвижения, за что ему громаднейшее спасибо! Привет зрителям канала! Располагайтесь поудобнее, заходите в комменты к постам. Окунайтесь в историю с самого начала, читайте про сервер и про клиент. Есть и чатик, милости просим! — пока пустой, но можно там поболтать.
🔥2❤1👍1
Продолжаем четверг! Слово автору @vopash --- Привет, меня зовут Яков и я делаю первое в мире доступное AR-расширение для систем автоматизированного проектирования (САПР, они же CAD). САПР/CAD — это программы, в которых инженеры и конструкторы проектируют любые вещи от шкафа до реактивного двигателя. AutoCAD, Solidworks, OnShape, Sketchup — именно там чертят, считают нагрузки, составляют программы для станков с ЧП…
👍1
Соскучились, поди? Ну ничаво, я принёс. Солвер порешили. Частично. Но ведь работает! Гладенько прям, красота же!
🤩2
Ручкой эть. Движение-то рассчиталось даже. На дисплее в фоне исходное, а на переднем плане вон какие потягушечки. Там всё равно багодром, конечно, и производительность такая себе (поэтому я скриншотиком показываю). Но сам факт-то!
🔥1
Да, надо было объяснить: одна из полезных фич САПРов в том, чтобы шевелить виртуальную сборку. Задаёшь шарниры и прочее подвижное, а дальше можешь непотребно трогать модельку за всякое. Вот чтобы можно было трогать за ± любой элемент, надо посчитать, как будут двигаться остальные элементы с учётом многочисленных ограничений шарниров. Вот над этим и колупаемся.
👌2
Весь день насиловал иишенку кинематическим солвером — и не очень удачно, как нетрудно заметить! — только чтобы обнаружить, что в FreeCADе он не просто есть, а в виде опенсорсного C++17 модуля, который можно просто скомпилировать и воткнуть в приложеньку... Хвала свифтовой интероперабельности! 💩 Потратил весь день на ерунду 👍 Иметь точно тот же солвер, что в САПРе ух как хорошо 🤔 Как я это портировать-то буду... Я по…
🤔2👍1
Что ж с тобой стало-то, Михалыч...
😁5
Вот новый поворот. Основание стрелы сидит на неподвижной оси (короткая серая вертикальная). Беру сборку за детальку и кручу. Положение сборки синхронизируется с фрикадом.
🔥2
Но я чертовски доволен курсором и выделялками. 🟡🟡🟡
Не всё проходит гладко. 😅 Так оно двигаться не должно.
Могу копать, могу не копать... Совмещение жестов: на расстоянии работает курсор, но если взять непосредственно за деталь, то её можно крутить.
🔥3🤩3
Channel name was changed to «СтереоМужик»
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @StereoManAR. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“СтереоМужик” (@StereoManAR), 69 subscribers as measured 29 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/StereoManAR.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.