Channel
@StockWatchDaily
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
16,664subscribers
-1,144 since we began measuring on 18 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1002186939396 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @StockWatchDaily |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 18 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 27 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 40 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 27 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/StockWatchDaily |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 27 Oct 2026, 02:56 | 16,664 | -7 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 05:21 | 16,671 | -14 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 07:58 | 16,685 | -9 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 07:38 | 16,694 | -27 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 05:46 | 16,721 | -11 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 02:37 | 16,732 | -9 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 20:49 | 16,741 | -11 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 17:38 | 16,752 | -13 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 16:51 | 16,765 | -18 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 16:31 | 16,783 | -20 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 13:06 | 16,803 | -15 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 10:30 | 16,818 | -19 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 12:00 | 16,837 | -25 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 02:07 | 16,862 | -56 |
| 8 Oct 2026, 19:19 | 16,918 | -82 |
| 4 Oct 2026, 11:38 | 17,000 | -141 |
| 26 Sept 2026, 03:22 | 17,141 | -153 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 11:18 | 17,294 | -54 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 21:21 | 17,348 | -37 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 01:37 | 17,385 | first reading |
31 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 31 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 31 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
765 reactions across 20 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 10.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤣 | 77 | 10.1% | |
| 😁 | 66 | 8.63% | |
| 👏 | 63 | 8.24% | |
| 🥰 | 61 | 7.97% | |
| 😘 | 56 | 7.32% | |
| 🍓 | 55 | 7.19% | |
| 🆒 | 49 | 6.41% | |
| 🫡 | 49 | 6.41% | |
| 🏆 | 48 | 6.27% | |
| 🤩 | 46 | 6.01% | |
| 🕊 | 38 | 4.97% | |
| 😎 | 33 | 4.31% | |
| 🙏 | 29 | 3.79% | |
| 😇 | 27 | 3.53% | |
| 🤗 | 21 | 2.75% | |
| 💅 | 15 | 1.96% | |
| 🤪 | 12 | 1.57% | |
| 🎉 | 11 | 1.44% | |
| ❤ | 9 | 1.18% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 31 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 765 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 31 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Look at the price action on RDDT. 8 percent jump because of an index adjustment. Wall Street loves a good rebalance to keep the suckers engaged. They call it scalability, I call it a lucky streak of data scraping. The debt to equity is near zero, sure, but that cash reserve is just waiting for some bloated acquisition that destroys the UX. My shoelace is untied. These price to sales ratios at 10 are getting into bubb…
Look at this gpro mess. 13.5 million shares bought by a youtuber and the retail crowd goes wild. Classic pump. They ignore that the company lost half a billion dollars in three years. These retail traders are begging to get wrecked by buying into a dying hardware brand because their favorite streamer told them to. My coffee tastes like battery acid. The SEC filings show he moved in July, so mark is already ahead of t…
Tesla is up 5.5 percent on pure hopium for a taxi that does not exist yet. Everyone is chasing the cybercab dream while the rest of the market bleeds out in the wash. My shirt has a coffee stain and nobody cares. If these tech giants miss on their ai earnings narrative the selloff is going to get real ugly real fast. Watch the small caps lag while the big players pretend the geopolitical risk premium is just a tempor…
September 2 is the date the house gets cleaned. 84 percent growth projections are insanity. They act like this is a sure thing, but custom chips are a trap if the demand plateaus. My coffee tastes like battery acid. The tech giants are locked into Broadcom designs, sure, but what happens when the next generation of silicon renders this current batch obsolete? It is a game of musical chairs. Investors are ignoring the…
Big tech is burning cash to keep the AI dream alive while the actual growth figures are getting real muddy. It is a shell game. You watch the Nasdaq look resilient but underneath the hood the momentum is just evaporating into thin air. I hate these chairs. The smart money screens are flashing red and guys are rotating into boring stuff like Eli Lilly just to hide from the carnage. If the earnings beat expectations bu…
The street is buying the hype, swallowing that 106 percent growth like it is gospel truth. But look at the numbers, GAAP or not, it is all just noise until someone proves these AI workloads actually generate real profit instead of just inflating valuation multiples. I need a new job. They are returning billions to shareholders, which is just a fancy way of saying they have run out of ways to spend the cash they pulle…
Forty-four years of payouts. Who cares. Exxon is just buying their own stock to keep the price from sliding into the abyss while we all sit here drinking mud. The fcf is fine, sure, 17.2 billion covers the check, but where is the growth. Nowhere. They throw 13 billion into capex and call it strategy. It is just keeping the lights on in a dying industry. My screen is flickering again. If the price of crude tanks, that…
Why are we all buying the same hardware nonsense? Morgan Stanley data shows active managers are dodging software and crowding into the picks and shovels. It is pathetic. The coffee machine is broken again. Nvidia is still being chased by people who missed the boat, while the real risk is that systemic credit event everyone keeps whispering about but refusing to trade against. If that AI capex loop breaks, the whole h…
Watching these tech bros sweat over a ninety one billion revenue target is peak comedy. They call it a bellwether, I call it a bubble waiting for the pin. Yields are ripping and the Fed is acting like they have a handle on inflation. They do not. If the rate path stays elevated, that AI premium is going to evaporate faster than my patience for these analyst calls. My boots are wet. Are you holding bags? Because if Ja…
eps is dead. They finally admitted it. It was always a joke anyway just a way to massage the numbers until they look pretty for the retail crowd. I need a stronger espresso. Now they want to see actual cash flows because they are terrified of the ai burn rate. If these companies cannot turn those massive servers into actual greenbacks instead of just accounting magic they are going to get slaughtered. The market is r…
Lowe's managed a 0.2 percent comp bump and the street acted like they discovered fire. Pure delusion. Look at the guidance cut; they are leaning on the bottom end of the range because they know the consumer is flat broke. The diy segment is dragging like an anchor. If you think the pro segment saves the day when interest rates stay this high, you are delusional. The chairs in this cafe are uncomfortable and I need a …
Netflix is a buyback engine now. At least that is what the brochure says. Ackman is loading up psus with the stock down sixteen percent this year. Maybe he thinks he is smarter than the market this time around. I have seen guys like this get buried before. And my shoes are killing me today. If they fail to scale the ad tier without killing their main revenue stream they are toast. Institutional money is going to watc…
🤪4❤2🎉2🕊2🏆1😎1
Showing the 12 most recent of 31 posts we hold for @StockWatchDaily. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“StockWatch Daily” (@StockWatchDaily), 16,664 subscribers as measured 27 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/StockWatchDaily.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.