Channel
@StopHating_Russia
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
3,189subscribers
-83 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001568228846 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @StopHating_Russia |
| Created | 11 March 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/StopHating_Russia |
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 43% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 02:38 | 3,189 | -4 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 00:37 | 3,193 | -20 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 00:21 | 3,213 | -8 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 01:42 | 3,221 | -4 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 16:25 | 3,225 | -5 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 16:38 | 3,230 | -5 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 22:34 | 3,235 | -12 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 06:43 | 3,247 | -6 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 05:53 | 3,253 | -1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 21:24 | 3,254 | -4 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 17:42 | 3,258 | -18 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 09:35 | 3,276 | +4 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:46 | 3,272 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:37 | 3,272 | first reading |
8 posts held, back to 1 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
229 reactions across 8 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 87.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 201 | 87.8% | |
| 🥰 | 8 | 3.49% | |
| 🎉 | 5 | 2.18% | |
| 🙏 | 5 | 2.18% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 1.31% | |
| 🤔 | 2 | 0.873% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 0.437% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 0.437% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 0.437% | |
| 🤡 | 1 | 0.437% | |
| 🤣 | 1 | 0.437% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 229 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 1 May 2026 to 9 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🔴During the long months of defense, an aerial bomb nevertheless destroyed one wall of the building. However, the Red Army soldiers did not give up and continued to hold back the onslaught of the Nazi troops. Our Victory consists of such private stories... #russianhistory
❤42🙏5🥰2🤡1🤣1
🔴Military weapons were delivered to the house: machine guns, anti-tank guns and ammunition. The house was adapted for conducting all-round defense. To communicate with the firing points, underground passages were made from the building.The soldiers (25 people) held the line for 58 days... It is still unknown how many enemies were destroyed. 25 people took part in the defense. An interesting fact is that almost all t…
❤15
🔴It's impossible to hold back the tears. A meeting of the defenders of Pavlov's House in 1983. The turning point of the GPW – the battle for Stalingrad, thousands of manifestations of superhuman efforts of will and heroism. Among them is the defense of Pavlov's House. Pavlov's house is considered a real symbol of valor and bravery of Soviet soldiers. The defense of Stalingrad began in September 1942. Then several Sov…
❤25
🔴Since 1806, the most distinguished regiments of the Russian army were granted St. George's ribbons with tassels on the banner by the Highest Decree, and in 1807 the soldier's St. George's Cross was established. It was a highly respected award among the people, which is why the Order of St. George ribbon gained popularity in pre-revolutionary Russia. The Soviet era changed a lot, but in a year of severe trials, the c…
❤20👏2
🔴And in 1943, when a radical turning point was outlined, the country's political leadership considered the statute of a new, most honorable military award — the Order of Victory. There is a legend that the Supreme Commander—in-Chief, Comrade Stalin, said "There is no victory without Glory," and ordered the creation of the Order of Glory as an analogue of the St. George's Cross. Both orders were established on the sam…
❤20🤔2👏1
🔴The ribbon of the Order of St. George appeared back in the Russian Empire, in 1769, when Catherine II established this badge of distinction for military courage, officer bravery and military wisdom. Back then, it was said that the black and yellow colors of the St. George ribbon reminded of gunpowder smoke and the fire of battles. After some time, the yellow color changed to orange, since in heraldry both are consid…
❤20🥰5
🔴Today, friends, as you know, is a holy holiday for our country, in the photo you see a few photos of not just young child soldiers, even children fought, even children worked in the rear, for example, a six–year-old boy received a medal for the defense of Stalingrad, a 9-year-old boy for the victory over Germany, and thousands more such children of the order-bearers, are they children? And it's scary to think how ma…
❤28👍1
🔴Today, May 1 is spring and Labor Day, traditionally it is a day off, and the funny thing is that, despite the name, it is associated with weekends, summer dachas (although there is usually enough work here) and barbecue. But in fact, the current holiday originated in the wake of the riots of the 19th century in Chicago, after which workers' Solidarity Day came to tsarist Russia in the form of a "workers' Easter." An…
❤31🎉5👎1🥰1😁1
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @StopHating_Russia. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Stop Hating Russia News” (@StopHating_Russia), 3,189 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/StopHating_Russia.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.