Channel
@Strong_female
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
6,329subscribers
-163 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001126835631 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Strong_female |
| Created | Between 1 June 2017 and 30 September 2020 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 15 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Strong_female |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 53% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Sept 2026, 22:41 | 6,329 | -14 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 07:55 | 6,343 | -8 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 13:18 | 6,351 | -28 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 21:34 | 6,379 | -22 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 10:12 | 6,401 | -18 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 18:06 | 6,419 | -1 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 02:12 | 6,420 | -10 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 17:08 | 6,430 | -15 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 19:55 | 6,445 | -10 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 02:56 | 6,455 | -8 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 22:14 | 6,463 | -15 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 21:52 | 6,478 | -12 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:51 | 6,490 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:01 | 6,492 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 08:54 | 6,492 | first reading |
21 posts held, back to 20 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 14 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 21 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
12 reactions across 9 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 12 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 12 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 20 May 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🎬 لـِــٓســتة النجــم الذهبــي ❥♪ { سُبْحَانَ اللهِ وَبِحَمْدِهِ؛ سُبْحَانَ اللهِ العَظِيم ِِ} ➝⁽💭💗 " 💰 أسعار صرف العملات 💲 https://t.me/+UApBHPhNoWY1Yzg0 ~~ ⚙ info » @GoldenStar6 | +5k للإشتراك ⏰ from » 9PM To 9AM | لستة غير مثبتة ـــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــ ● ﭑفضل ﭑلقنوآت تجدونهٱ هنٱ 💛 🎶
"في ﺯﻣﻨﻨﺎ ﻫﺬﺍ ، ﺇﻳّﺎﻙ ﺃﻥ ﺗُﺸﻌِﺮ ﺃﺣﺪًا ﺑﺎﺣﺘﻴﺎﺟﻚ ﻟﻪ."
❤1
اينَ يذهَب المرء إذا تراكمَت الأمور على قلبه!
❤1
سعيده بكونكي انثى....
The shares total 117%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
أنت ريحانة بيتك فأشعري زوجك بعطر هذه الريحانة منذ لحظة دخوله البيت.
تكمن السعادة في بيتك ، فلا تبحث عنها في حديقة الغرباء ..
الأنثى لا ﺗُﺮﻳﺪ اﻟﻜﺜﻴﺮ .. ﻓَﻘﻂ دللها بالطريقة ﺍﻟﺘّﻲ تجعل منها ﻣﻠﻜـه ..!
جميع النِّساء رائعاتٌ بشكلّ أو بآخر ، لا يوجد امراةٌ إلا وتحملُ على كتفيها الضَّوء لمدينةٍ كاملة💛
أعتقد أنه على المرء أن يقدس كُلَّ أخطاؤه التي جعلت منه واعياً إلى هذا الحد💙
❤1
، كيفَ يُمكنك أن تَعتقد أنَكَ ضعيفْ وفي كُلِ مرةٍ تُكسر ، تعودُ أقوى مِن قبلْ🖤
*-' جهّزُو أمانِيكُم، سِهام عرَفة صائبَة بإذن الله تعالى .. "*
- أمان ﴿ لا تحزَنْ إِنّ اللهَ معَنَا ﴾ - طمأنينة ﴿فَسَيَكْفِيكَهُمُ الله ﴾ - توكُّل ﴿ وأفوّض أمري إلى الله ﴾ - رعاية ﴿واصبِر لحُكمِ ربّكَ فإنّكَ بأعيُننا﴾ - تفاؤل : ﴿ وما ذلك على الله بعزيز ﴾ ﴿لاتدري لعلّ اللهَ يُحدِثُ بعدَ ذلك أمراً﴾♥️
❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @Strong_female. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
سعيده بكونكي انثى....
The shares total 117%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
عندك شخص تثق فيه ⁉️
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 20 May 2026 to 11 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“إتزان الأنثى 💜"” (@Strong_female), 6,329 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Strong_female.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.