Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for โ€ข ๐’๐“๐˜๐‹๐„ - TEAM ้–‹

Channel

โ€ข ๐’๐“๐˜๐‹๐„ - TEAM ้–‹

@StyleTeam

On this record: Topic ยท Growth ยท Engagement ยท What this channel posts ยท Reactions ยท Stars ยท Posts ยท Posts edited after publishing ยท Polls ยท Citations ยท Handles named that no longer answer ยท Cite this entry

63,956subscribers

+53,446 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of 31,623โ€“100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003580320596
TypeChannel
Username@StyleTeam
Descriptionโ€ข ๐’๐“๐˜๐‹๐„ TEAM Founder: @oziwl
CreatedBetween 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026 โ€” estimated from Telegramโ€™s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live2 September 2026
Measurements held25
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 2 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/StyleTeam

Topic

Giveaways & airdrops โ€” a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channelโ€™s own recent posts on 15 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 86% confidence. This is a modelโ€™s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured โ€” it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

10,497124,40367,4508 August 2026 โ€” 10,510 subscribers8 August 2026 โ€” 10,497 subscribers9 August 2026 โ€” 10,504 subscribers10 August 2026 โ€” 10,742 subscribers11 August 2026 โ€” 96,022 subscribers12 August 2026 โ€” 97,297 subscribers14 August 2026 โ€” 85,608 subscribers15 August 2026 โ€” 109,399 subscribers16 August 2026 โ€” 102,281 subscribers18 August 2026 โ€” 100,919 subscribers18 August 2026 โ€” 97,624 subscribers19 August 2026 โ€” 94,125 subscribers20 August 2026 โ€” 93,602 subscribers22 August 2026 โ€” 124,403 subscribers23 August 2026 โ€” 113,369 subscribers25 August 2026 โ€” 107,877 subscribers26 August 2026 โ€” 101,307 subscribers27 August 2026 โ€” 93,991 subscribers28 August 2026 โ€” 91,507 subscribers29 August 2026 โ€” 90,692 subscribers30 August 2026 โ€” 82,606 subscribers31 August 2026 โ€” 80,265 subscribers31 August 2026 โ€” 65,797 subscribers1 September 2026 โ€” 64,338 subscribers2 September 2026 โ€” 63,956 subscribers63,9568 August 20262 September 2026
25 measurements spanning 26 days, net +53,446. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between โ€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean โ€œno change observedโ€, never โ€œinterpolatedโ€.
Measurement log โ€” every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
2 Sept 2026, 20:2963,956-382
1 Sept 2026, 20:5464,338-1,459
31 Aug 2026, 21:0965,797-14,468
31 Aug 2026, 00:4380,265-2,341
30 Aug 2026, 03:3782,606-8,086
29 Aug 2026, 04:5590,692-815
28 Aug 2026, 01:3791,507-2,484
27 Aug 2026, 02:4593,991-7,316
26 Aug 2026, 04:03101,307-6,570
25 Aug 2026, 02:07107,877-5,492
23 Aug 2026, 15:13113,369-11,034
22 Aug 2026, 04:36124,403+30,801
20 Aug 2026, 22:0393,602-523
19 Aug 2026, 19:4594,125-3,499
18 Aug 2026, 21:5697,624-3,295
18 Aug 2026, 01:07100,919-1,362
16 Aug 2026, 22:06102,281-7,118
15 Aug 2026, 17:23109,399+23,791
14 Aug 2026, 03:0785,608-11,689
12 Aug 2026, 22:3397,297first reading

Engagement

208 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 โ€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโ€™s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 57 pages of Telegramโ€™s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR ยท 30 days
1.19%
avg views รท 63,956 subscribers
Avg views / post
764
205 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.682%
reactions รท views ยท ER floor
Posts in window
208
of 208 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) รท views โ€” note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramโ€™s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 108 of 205 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days ยท latest post in window 3 September 2026
Posts held208 (5 August 2026 โ€“ 3 September 2026)
Views total156,659
Reactions total690
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface โ€” not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 16:35 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than โ€œcorrectingโ€ the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form โ€” 8.12K, 3.7M โ€” so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded โ€” read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
101
Videos
6
Links
47

Lifetime counters from Telegramโ€™s own channel header, read 3 September 2026 โ€” not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegramโ€™s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
54s
Average length
14s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel โ€” not this channelโ€™s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramโ€™s own rounded chrome, so it carries no โ‰ˆ mark.

Reaction mix

690 reactions across 103 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 64.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
๐Ÿ”ฅ44264.1%
โค9113.2%
๐Ÿ˜ญ7310.6%
๐Ÿ‘Œ395.65%
๐Ÿ‘202.90%
๐Ÿค—81.16%
โšก50.725%
๐Ÿฅฐ50.725%
๐Ÿคฉ30.435%
๐Ÿ™20.29%
๐Ÿซก20.29%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ€” ๐Ÿ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ€” 4.34K, 1.2M โ€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 108 of the 208 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโ€™s own count on each post โ€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ€” those same posts carry 690 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โ€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ€.

Measured over the 208 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 205 we hold a reading for ยท 0.5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars โ€” bought with money โ€” on a post by @StyleTeam. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 208 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 3 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegramโ€™s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

3 Sept 2026, 13:23 UTC118 views1 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @XstylegamePhoto

7 pemenang gift nft hari ini๐Ÿ”ฅ t.me/xstylegamebot/app

โค1

Signed rafz

3 Sept 2026, 12:14 UTC185 viewsread 3 September 2026

gass lekk jangan sampe nyesell soalnya ini event trakhir

Signed rafz

3 Sept 2026, 11:14 UTC377 viewsread 3 September 2026
Photo

event puncak kita hari ini vintage cigar hanya dengan 3stars saja di @gamenft777 batas waktu 24JAM buruan main sekarang sblum event ini brakhir JANGAN SAMPE NYESEL!!

Signed rafz

3 Sept 2026, 08:48 UTC310 views1 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

pemenang baru lagi bosss di @gamenft777 hanya dengan 15 stars aja lekk gass keburu event ini berakhir jangan sampe nyesel

โค1

Signed rafz

2 Sept 2026, 17:20 UTC504 viewsread 3 September 2026

lekk bd black gua openin di rate 1stars di @gamenft777 Link gift https://t.me/nft/ChillFlame-409451 siapp' janhan sampe nyesell

Signed rafz

2 Sept 2026, 16:23 UTC443 viewsread 3 September 2026
Photo

wopss pemenang baru lagi di @gamenft777 masih banyak nft yang bisa kalian dapatkan yokk gassken sblum event ini brakhir JANGAN SAMPE NYESEL

Signed rafz

2 Sept 2026, 14:55 UTC546 viewsread 3 September 2026
Photo

event berhadiah gift nft bd black sudah di mulai bet banya 2stars gass sisa waktu hanya 30 mnit lagi @gamenft777

Signed rafz

2 Sept 2026, 14:11 UTC460 viewsread 3 September 2026
Photo

2 pemenang baru lagi di @gamenft77 ๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿ”ฅ gass sblum event brakhir JANGAN SAMPE NYESEL

Signed rafz

2 Sept 2026, 13:55 UTC418 viewsread 3 September 2026
Photo

gass trus lekk tawarin gift nft rate bu siap tampung sebanyak mungkinn gasskenn dm @oziwl

Signed rafz

Showing the 12 most recent of 208 posts we hold for @StyleTeam. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@StyleTeam edited 2 posts after it first published โ€” the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too โ€” this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
13 August 2026
Most recent edit
22 August 2026

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A pollโ€™s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

20 Aug 2026, 17:37 UTCAnonymous Poll97 voters

kita g a gift nft lagi gass?

  1. gasss lekkuu78%
  2. gausaa lekkk29%

The shares total 107%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only โ€” there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each optionโ€™s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each optionโ€™s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 208 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 3 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind โ€” an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results โ€” and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels โ€” every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched โ€” that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayโ€™s namer to yesterdayโ€™s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ€” naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ€” the โ€œNamed by N registered channelsโ€ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 September 2026 โ€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

โ€œโ€ข ๐’๐“๐˜๐‹๐„ - TEAM ้–‹โ€ (@StyleTeam), 63,956 subscribers as measured 2 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/StyleTeam.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.