Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for حقيقة الصوفية

Channel

حقيقة الصوفية

@Sufi_fact

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,818subscribers

-8 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001839538386
TypeChannel
Username@Sufi_fact
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Sufi_fact

Topic

Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,8161,8341,8257 August 2026 — 1,826 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,824 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,820 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1,816 subscribers17 August 2026 — 1,824 subscribers20 August 2026 — 1,823 subscribers24 August 2026 — 1,830 subscribers28 August 2026 — 1,834 subscribers30 August 2026 — 1,833 subscribers2 September 2026 — 1,829 subscribers7 September 2026 — 1,821 subscribers12 September 2026 — 1,822 subscribers15 September 2026 — 1,818 subscribers1,8187 August 202615 September 2026
13 measurements spanning 39 days, net -8. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,813–1,837 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Sept 2026, 18:561,818-4
12 Sept 2026, 00:381,822+1
7 Sept 2026, 17:391,821-8
2 Sept 2026, 08:341,829-4
30 Aug 2026, 17:581,833-1
28 Aug 2026, 04:421,834+4
24 Aug 2026, 20:251,830+7
20 Aug 2026, 20:251,823-1
17 Aug 2026, 17:181,824+8
14 Aug 2026, 14:151,816-4
10 Aug 2026, 22:161,820-4
8 Aug 2026, 04:521,824-2
7 Aug 2026, 09:481,826first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 22 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
10m 16s
Average length
1m 17s

Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁1100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 14:11 UTC66 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @sofit_hdramuthVideo

من وسائل التعليم عند صوفية حضرموت التفل ومص اللسان !! ( ١ )

6 Aug 2026, 04:42 UTC83 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @sofit_hdramuthPhoto

ابن عبيد الله السقاف يعاتب من أنكروا على شيخ الإسلام ابن تيمية فتواه في تحريم شد الرحال لزيارة القبر النبوي ولم ينكروا على من سبقه من العلماء القائلين بالتحريم مثله

4 Aug 2026, 04:04 UTC133 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @sofit_hdramuthVideo

علوي الحداد يخترع حديثا في ذم الشيخ محمد بن عبد الوهاب رحمه الله!!

2 Aug 2026, 15:17 UTC176 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @sofit_hdramuthVideo

الولي المزعوم وتفتيش الملابس الداخلية لتلميذه !!

30 Jul 2026, 21:31 UTC237 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

الإمام الذهبي يذكر بعض الأمور #الشركية التي تحصل عند قبر السيدة نفيسة!!

30 Jul 2026, 04:58 UTC244 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @sofit_hdramuthVideo

خرافة نقل الغائط من شخص إلى آخر !!

😁1

29 Jul 2026, 21:28 UTC230 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

📌الحافظ ابن حجر #العسقلاني: يصف بعض ما يحصل عند القبر #المزعوم للسيدة #نفيسة وأن بعضهم بسبب الغلو فيها قد يقع في #الكفر وهو لا يشعر!

29 Jul 2026, 20:31 UTC200 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

📌الصوفي أحمد #الغماري تـ1380هـ يعترف بوجود #الشرك الأكبر والكفر الصراح عند بعض #القبوريين!

27 Jul 2026, 15:30 UTC255 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @sofit_hdramuthVideo

عبدالفتاح اليافعي لماذا دحلان دون الحداد؟!

26 Jul 2026, 20:16 UTC301 viewsread 7 August 2026
Video

الصوفي #يسري_جبر لو قال لنا الرسول ﷺ لا تحتفلوا بمولدي سنخالف الدليل وسنحتفل!!

26 Jul 2026, 06:38 UTC303 viewsread 7 August 2026

💡| الجواب عن الاستدلال على جواز ‎#المولد_النبوي بقول النبي ﷺ عن صوم يوم الاثنين: ( ذاك يوم ولدت فيه ...) | قال بعضهم: دليلنا على الاحتفال بالمولد: قوله ﷺ عن صوم يوم الاثنين: (ذاك يوم ولدت فيه، ويوم بُعثت -أو أنزل علي- فيه) رواه مسلم. وهذا من أغرب الاستدلالات! • أولًا: الحديث يقرِّر فيه ﷺ: الصَّوم وهم يقرِّرون: احتفالًا! فيه أشياء كثيرة .. ليس منها الصَّوم! فأين هذا من هذا؟! • ثانيًا: الحديث في صوم يوم الاثنين من ك

25 Jul 2026, 13:56 UTC265 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @sofit_hdramuthVideo

علوي بن حامد بن شهاب يطعن في السلفيين بأنهم يكرهون الرسول صلى الله عليه وسلم بسبب المولد وكراهية الرسول صلى الله عليه وسلم كفر

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Sufi_fact. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“حقيقة الصوفية” (@Sufi_fact), 1,818 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Sufi_fact.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.