Channel
@SupeeerDiiii
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
306subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 2 October 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001519128702 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @SupeeerDiiii |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 31 March 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 2 October 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 20 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 20 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/SupeeerDiiii |
Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 47% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 20 Oct 2026, 16:30 | 306 | +2 |
| 2 Oct 2026, 14:22 | 304 | no change |
| 2 Oct 2026, 13:47 | 304 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 4 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 11 (4 September 2026 – 1 October 2026) |
| Views total | 652 |
| Reactions total | 75 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 2 Oct 2026, 14:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
259 reactions across 11 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 85 | 32.8% | |
| custom 5453930874699542906 | 47 | 18.1% | |
| 👨💻 | 27 | 10.4% | |
| 💘 | 27 | 10.4% | |
| 💔 | 24 | 9.27% | |
| custom 5283096012175450685 | 18 | 6.95% | |
| custom 5240139609001698963 | 11 | 4.25% | |
| 🍓 | 8 | 3.09% | |
| custom 5456374745450711129 | 6 | 2.32% | |
| ✍ | 6 | 2.32% |
Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 259 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 4 September 2026 to 1 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @SupeeerDiiii. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 11 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 September 2026 to 1 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
ура, праздник закончился! и мы закончились, считаю, это была бы красивая точка окончания моей карьеры в вузе, но завтра на работу 😔
custom 545393087469954290611👨💻7custom 52830960121754506857
завтра мгу исполняется 95 лет! совсем взрослый стал!!! //посмотрите, какая красота будет в городе сегодня и завтра по вечерам, прелесть!
🔥12💔6custom 54539308746995429066💘3
У МГУ им. Н.П. Огарёва 1 октября день рождения!!! //мы очень упорно к нему готовимся, после празднования, мы уйдем в затишье отдыхать, по ощущениям, что это нам 95 лет исполняется И наше управление по связям с общественностью и центр интернета создали бот для всех-всех, кто хочет поздравить вуз с днём рождения! Надеюсь, что увижу все свои контакты с праздничной аватаркой 😎
🔥11💘6custom 54539308746995429066
Команда, объективно, вы лучшие. Если ни с кем не сравнивать.
💔13✍6👨💻3
мне очень жаль, что я не могу открыть просто свой второй канал, где каждый день прямой эфир моей жизни 😔 но так сильно проще показать хотя бы маленькую часть этого фестиваля //можете, конечно, зайти в Медиацентр и посмотреть там))) но я когда-нибудь и в этом канале буду такой контент выкладывать 😎
custom 54539308746995429069🔥7custom 52401396090016989634
ладно, вот нормальный контент извините, концерты не даем 🙄
🔥13custom 528309601217545068511👨💻7💘2
выбираем инфоповод, который, возможно, появится в этом канале: - что мы делаем на МФМ, как вообще тут все устроено, открытие, лекции, артисты и так далее - концерт Димы Билана!!!! это вообще вау (и немножко Егора Крида) - работа наша на МФМ, что создаем - работа наша не на МФМ, а все проекты в Мордовии - просто мои фотографии - ничего не выкладывать - лето всё-таки до конца выложить (так можно и в апрель вернуться, …
👨💻9🍓6💘5custom 54563747454507111291
немножко посмотрели на Екатеринбург //я в образе Раскольникова, если вдруг не поняли 🚩 вообще, мне показалось, что сам город очень красивый, благодаря архитектуре моя тётя на этот тезис ответила, что это Урал, родина всех реперов типо Вити АКа, намекая на «культурную» обогащённость этого края
🔥13custom 54539308746995429068custom 54563747454507111295💘2
Video message, posted without a caption
💔5💘5🔥5
вчера вышло у Юлии Меньшовой интервью с Сергеем Лавровым! я, во-первых, была в восторге от этой новости //с профессиональной точки зрения, что это в целом возможно, как это преподнесено, какого героя они смогли позвать, и как круто отработала сама Меньшова! здесь стоит сказать, что она мне в целом нравится, как интервьюер вот сегодня перед работой на режиме ускорения посмотрела его… ну это прям совсем другой уровен…
🔥9💘4🍓2👨💻1
что делать, если чипсы и кола не помогают больше в борьбе с экзистенциальным кризисом? вот кто я без тупых шуток, иногда злого сарказма, наглости, странных решений, громкого смеха и так далее?
🔥15custom 52401396090016989637custom 54539308746995429067
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @SupeeerDiiii. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 20 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“так это кайф” (@SupeeerDiiii), 306 subscribers as measured 20 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SupeeerDiiii.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.