Как вы считаете? Что сильнее влияет на жизнь человека: обстоятельства или мышление?
- обстоятельства0%
Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Channel
@SuperMila_joy_soul
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
478subscribers
-9 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001772333435 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @SuperMila_joy_soul |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/SuperMila_joy_soul |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 79% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 19:21 | 478 | -2 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 14:59 | 480 | -2 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 11:09 | 482 | -1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 23:47 | 483 | -4 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:31 | 487 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:59 | 487 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 24 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 14 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
39 reactions across 15 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 16 | 41.0% | |
| ❤ | 6 | 15.4% | |
| ❤🔥 | 6 | 15.4% | |
| 💯 | 5 | 12.8% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 7.69% | |
| 🙏 | 2 | 5.13% | |
| 👌 | 1 | 2.56% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 39 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Как вы считаете? Что сильнее влияет на жизнь человека: обстоятельства или мышление?
Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🗣Многие уверены, что им не хватает денег, связей, удачи или подходящего момента. Но за годы работы я увидела другую закономерность. Очень часто возможности уже находятся рядом. Мы просто не замечаем их, потому что продолжаем смотреть на жизнь через прежнее мышление. Именно поэтому два человека могут оказаться в одинаковых обстоятельствах, но увидеть совершенно разные перспективы. Если вы хотите изменить результа…
🗣Выбери карту интуитивно 👑 Ответы в комментариях читай ⤵️
❤🔥1👍1🔥1
💬 Есть легенды. А есть люди, которые становятся частью мировой истории. Майкл Джексон был именно таким. Он не просто пел и танцевал. Он говорил с людьми языком музыки, рассказывал о добре, любви, страхе, несправедливости и о том, что происходит с человеком, когда против него восстаёт весь мир. Многие до сих пор даже не знают, что «Призраки» (Ghosts) — это не обычный клип. Это 39-минутный короткометражный фильм, кот…
❤1
🗓 8 августа — дата, которую можно использовать не для ожидания чуда, а для осознанной настройки на деньги, возможности и новое внутреннее состояние. Для практики понадобятся всего 8 монет, 8 слов и несколько минут тишины. Но главный инструмент здесь не металл и не цифры. Главный инструмент — ваше внимание, намерение и готовность перестать повторять прежний денежный сценарий. 🗣 Сохраните карусель, чтобы провести пра…
👍1🔥1
Posted without readable text
❤🔥1💯1🔥1
⚠️ Осторожно! Этот фильм может стать одним из самых сильных, которые вы когда-либо смотрели. Кажется, что это обычная семейная драма. Но каждая новая сцена переворачивает предыдущую. «Пожары» — история, в которой завещание матери становится началом невероятного расследования. Брат и сестра отправляются на поиски человека, которого считали мёртвым, и открывают тайны, которые невозможно было представить. Финал… без …
❤🔥2💯2🔥2
🗣 Прежде чем зарабатывать больше - нужно разрешить себе хотеть больше. 🎯 Если хотите начать искать ответ, напишите «СУММА» — я отправлю вам бесплатную диагностику «Ваша Точка Разворота». #мышление #психология #саморазвитие #женщина #счастье
🗣Что для вас деньги? Я задала всего один вопрос. Ответ был не про деньги, а про жизнь. Иногда один честный ответ показывает больше, чем десятки советов. А что бы сделали вы, если бы прямо сегодня у вас появились 100 000 рублей? 👇 Напишите свой первый ответ, не задумываясь. Именно он часто говорит о нас больше, чем кажется. #мышление #деньги #психология #саморазвитие #жизнь
❤🔥1💯1🔥1
Photo, posted without a caption
🗣 Есть два сценария жизни. В первом человек живёт словно по кругу: одни и те же проблемы, нелюбимая работа, нехватка денег, усталость, ощущение, что жизнь проходит мимо. Во втором человек знает себя. Он понимает, куда идёт, чем хочет заниматься, с кем хочет быть рядом и ради чего просыпается каждое утро. Что изменилось? Не обстоятельства. Он просто однажды честно ответил себе на вопрос: «Кто я на самом деле?» Имен…
❤1🔥1🙏1
Posted without readable text
🔥2❤1❤🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @SuperMila_joy_soul. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Как вы считаете? Что сильнее влияет на жизнь человека: обстоятельства или мышление?
Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Бывало у вас так?
Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ЛюдМила Мамай | Точка разворота™” (@SuperMila_joy_soul), 478 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SuperMila_joy_soul.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.