Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Света пишет и читает

Channel

Света пишет и читает

@Sveta_pishet_i_chitaet

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

123subscribers

+5 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001894365695
TypeChannel
Username@Sveta_pishet_i_chitaet
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 September 2026
Last confirmed live27 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 27 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Sveta_pishet_i_chitaet

Topic

Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 26 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 86% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

11812412113 August 2026 — 118 subscribers13 August 2026 — 119 subscribers22 August 2026 — 123 subscribers6 September 2026 — 122 subscribers12 September 2026 — 122 subscribers13 September 2026 — 124 subscribers27 September 2026 — 123 subscribers12313 August 202627 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 45 days, net +5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 117–125 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
27 Sept 2026, 04:01123-1
13 Sept 2026, 17:00124+2
12 Sept 2026, 10:22122no change
6 Sept 2026, 22:00122-1
22 Aug 2026, 06:07123+4
13 Aug 2026, 22:37119+1
13 Aug 2026, 09:48118first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 29 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
52.9%
avg views ÷ 123 subscribers
Avg views / post
65.1
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
17.1%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 11 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 September 2026
Posts held11 (29 August 2026 – 10 September 2026)
Views total651
Reactions total111
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Sept 2026, 10:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

130 reactions across 11 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤2922.3%
🤣2620.0%
custom 54496981071199048291813.8%
🍾1612.3%
😁118.46%
❤‍🔥75.38%
🌚53.85%
🦄53.85%
custom 533052848853118229543.08%
🔥43.08%
☃32.31%
😈21.54%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 130 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 29 August 2026 to 10 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

10 Sept 2026, 19:03 UTC52 views16 reactionsread 12 September 2026
Photo

Финал сезона, как записи в детских (и не очень) дневниках😌 Мой фаворит - последняя! #ДомДракона

🤣9❤4😁3

10 Sept 2026, 10:52 UTC48 views5 reactionsread 12 September 2026
Poll

Что хотим?

  1. Фики71%
  2. Мемы43%
  3. Статью39%
  4. Сиди уже спокойно, Света, выползешь с новым сезоном рск4%

The shares total 157%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

🦄5

10 Sept 2026, 10:50 UTC46 views9 reactionsread 12 September 2026

У меня наконец-то новый клевый телефон с огромной памятью. Это не поможет с райтблоком, который чуточку присутствует, конечно, но поможет с мемами😂 Вот в чём вопрос: писать фики в час по чайной ложке или хехекать в картинках. Фики или мемы. Мемы или фики. А ещё я вспомнила, что после третьего сезона хотела написать статью по ДД про арки персонажей через призму литературоведения... Ужас!

custom 54496981071199048296🍾3

8 Sept 2026, 12:55 UTC54 views14 reactionsread 12 September 2026

Ормунд Хайтауэр в модерне - не только глава корпорации, доставшейся от отца по наследству. Для души он подрабатывает в озвучке детских сказок. Ну знаете, все эти таксисты, бармены, цветочницы, работающие для души... Так и тут. Хобби, чтобы мозг отдохнул. Работает он, работает, озвучивает вечерами и в какой-то момент с удивлением узнает, что прослушивания на сайте растут и растут. Про его бархатный голос рассказывают…

🤣6🍾5❤3

8 Sept 2026, 12:55 UTC52 views10 reactionsread 12 September 2026
Photo

Я не хотела выкладывать эту свою идею сюда, потому что предпочитаю все мысли вкладывать в фики, да и если каждого моего мозгового червя показывать вам, у меня останется три подписчика. Но... Червь вылез, смотрите-ка. А фик вряд ли будет. Короче, спасибо за фотку Ане. Утром я увидела вот такого Нортона и, конечно, придумала следующее:

🌚5❤3😈2

8 Sept 2026, 08:37 UTC58 views10 reactionsread 12 September 2026
Photo

Мой бот для анонимок издевается надо мной. Помню, ещё весной нормально работал, летом я не могла принимать сообщения вообще, а сейчас он не даёт мне их раскрыть. Это пытка какая-то, мне же любопытно😂 аж два сообщения вчера вечером пришло. Полагаю, написано в обоих было что-то хорошее, так что спасибо! Удалила из шапки тгк ссылку на бота, пусть покоится с миром. Если что, пишите в личку канала. Всех люблю, спасибо, ч…

❤10

7 Sept 2026, 11:00 UTC64 views7 reactionsread 12 September 2026

Очень плакала на последней серии. Очень. Толстой гений, познавший суть человека и самой жизни. Вот знаете... То самое чувство, когда в шестнадцать лет ты такой: боже, этот чел так велик, так велик, умираю! Потом после двадцати: ну такое себе, тут открылись новые обстоятельства, как человек он вроде был не очень, да и писал ради денег свои графоманские процессники специально подлиннее, чтоб журналы платили побольше …

❤‍🔥7

5 Sept 2026, 14:06 UTC73 views10 reactionsread 12 September 2026
Photo

Я, пытающаяся балансировать в фике с меткой "тайная личность" между лёгкими намёками читателю и разжёвыванием до состояния трухи: так, ну пейринг обязательно проставим, это ж не ориджинал, надо уважать коллег по фд; добавим герою каноничных предметов одежды, цвет глаз тоже опишем, как в каноне, некоторые вещи проговорим прямо, но в рамках пова гг, другой герой будет задаваться вопросами, намекающими на логические дыр…

🤣8❤2

4 Sept 2026, 13:37 UTC89 views22 reactionsread 12 September 2026
Photo

Каждый, глядя на несчастного взрослого Дейрона Таргариена: о, ты начал пить из-за драконьих снов? Представляю... Дар предвиденья - это такая ноша... Дейрон, выросший старшим в многодетной семье Мейкара и вспоминающий во время таких разговоров, что действительно привело его к алкоголизму: нууу, д-да... Художник: malotte

😁8❤7🔥4🤣3

31 Aug 2026, 15:02 UTC115 views8 reactionsread 12 September 2026
Photo

Как я жду это кино! Сообщили дату: 18 ноября и я просто: 😭🥳🥂 оно будет волшебное, зимнее и рождественское! Мне немного жаль, что проката на большом экране не будет, и сильно жаль, что это Нетфликс, который хорошее только покупает у других стран и не делает сам, но буду надеяться на магию ✨Энди Макдауэлл✨ Господи, сколько в детстве с ней пересмотрено доброго, смешного, человечного! Снятого для людей, а не для корпора…

custom 54496981071199048298

29 Aug 2026, 16:42 UTC102 views19 reactionsread 12 September 2026
Photo

Может ли меня кто-то забанить в моём собственном канале? Иначе я сейчас снова расскажу вам о своих фикрайтерских планах, а потом из них будет написана дай бог половина😌😔 Нет, никто не может? Ну тогда вот, смотрите, мой любимый сетевой поэт Джио Россо написал стих, и я - спасибо за вдохновение - вновь присела за продолжение моих любимых модерн-Дейрионов. Мне кажется, вместо имени Мэри там как родное встаёт имя Дей…

🍾8custom 53305284885311822954custom 54496981071199048294☃3

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @Sveta_pishet_i_chitaet. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

10 Sept 2026, 10:52 UTCAnonymous Poll28 voters

Что хотим?

  1. Фики71%
  2. Мемы43%
  3. Статью39%
  4. Сиди уже спокойно, Света, выползешь с новым сезоном рск4%

The shares total 157%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 29 August 2026 to 10 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Света пишет и читает” (@Sveta_pishet_i_chitaet), 123 subscribers as measured 27 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Sveta_pishet_i_chitaet.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.