Украинский разведывательный дрон Shark-M упал на позиции просаудовских сил в Йемене БПЛА Shark (Shark-M) украинского производства рухнул в прибрежной провинции Лахдж в Йемене — прямо на позиции просаудовских сил. На фото 2-3 — для сравнения. Напомню: на фоне войны с Ираном весной 2026 года Украина и Саудовская Аравия заключали соглашение об оборонном сотрудничестве, а Зеленский заявлял об отправке в страну украинск…

Channel
Фронтовые сводки
@SvodkiFrontov
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
7,450subscribers
-454 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002019534581 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @SvodkiFrontov |
| Description | Реальная боевая обстановка в зоне СВО |
| Created | 31 January 2024 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 27 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/SvodkiFrontov |
Topic
International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 91% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Nov 2026, 02:21 | 7,450 | -1 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 00:56 | 7,451 | -7 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 21:56 | 7,458 | -13 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 14:46 | 7,471 | -15 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 17:16 | 7,486 | -1 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 03:11 | 7,487 | -16 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 19:07 | 7,503 | -18 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 00:29 | 7,521 | -14 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 05:39 | 7,535 | -21 |
| 10 Oct 2026, 12:55 | 7,556 | -23 |
| 4 Oct 2026, 20:40 | 7,579 | -47 |
| 24 Sept 2026, 22:01 | 7,626 | -53 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 03:40 | 7,679 | -24 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 14:01 | 7,703 | -30 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 08:00 | 7,733 | -25 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 03:36 | 7,758 | -21 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 10:34 | 7,779 | -7 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 06:34 | 7,786 | -4 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 02:12 | 7,790 | -30 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 13:15 | 7,820 | first reading |
Engagement
256 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 29 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 6.53%
- avg views ÷ 7,450 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 486
- 85 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.593%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 85
- of 256 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 53 of 85 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 256 (5 August 2026 – 8 November 2026) |
| Views total | 41,351 |
| Reactions total | 200 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Nov 2026, 14:03 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈4,140
- Videos
- ≈4,140
- Links
- ≈1,900
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 1h 11m
- Average length
- 35s
Measured directly from 122 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
924 reactions across 175 posts, in 31 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 252 | 27.3% | |
| 🔥 | 217 | 23.5% | |
| 🤬 | 89 | 9.63% | |
| ❤ | 58 | 6.28% | |
| 💩 | 53 | 5.74% | |
| 😁 | 40 | 4.33% | |
| 🤡 | 40 | 4.33% | |
| 🤔 | 32 | 3.46% | |
| 🙏 | 31 | 3.35% | |
| 💯 | 26 | 2.81% | |
| 🤣 | 19 | 2.06% | |
| 👎 | 15 | 1.62% | |
| 😢 | 12 | 1.30% | |
| 😱 | 7 | 0.758% | |
| 👏 | 6 | 0.649% | |
| 🖕 | 5 | 0.541% | |
| ⚡ | 4 | 0.433% | |
| 🦄 | 3 | 0.325% | |
| 👀 | 2 | 0.216% | |
| 😍 | 2 | 0.216% | |
| 11 further kinds | 11 | 1.19% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 179 of the 256 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 924 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 256 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 8 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 85 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Gepard украинского ПВО отработала по дронам-камикадзе «Герань», летевшим прямо над ней ЗСУ показала работу зенитной самоходной установки Gepard по российским дронам-камикадзе «Герань». Беспилотники пролетали прямо над установкой. Gepard вела огонь по целям в небе. Судя по видео, дроны шли буквально над головой расчёта. @SvodkiFrontov
🤬3
АД НА ЗЕМЛЕ Запрещенка, самый жестокий канал 2026 года про СВО, который покажет вам всю правду с фронта без цензуры и фейков Пора открыть глаза👇 https://t.me/+rzvykTZ03D5mZjAy
Макеты мобильных огневых групп ставят вдоль дорог для отвлечения украинских дронов-камикадзе На дорогах начали размещать макеты мобильных огневых групп. Смысл простой — украинские дроны-камикадзе ведутся на фейковые цели и тратятся на пустышки, а не на реальную технику. @SvodkiFrontov
👍4🤡1
В Киеве прилеты 6-8 баллистических ракет По городу прилетело от 6 до 8 баллистических ракет. Предположительно, использовались РМ-48У для поражения энергетической инфраструктуры. @SvodkiFrontov
👍3🔥2
Иранский Як-130 тараном сбил вражеский дрон Иранские СМИ рассказали историю весеннего отражения ударов США и Израиля. Учебно-боевой Як-130 ВВС Ирана выпустил ракету по вражескому БПЛА, но та не сработала — дрон глушил её средствами противодействия. А так как БПЛА летел в сторону стратегического объекта, пилот решил таранить его. Дрон сбили, самолёт успешно сел, а на узле подвески остались куски протараненного БПЛА.…
🫡1
Весь ПЗДЦ России теперь в одном месте 🔞 Мы даем вам доступ к каналу, который показывает все как есть: — наказания мигрантов, плюющих на закон (смотреть) 🪓 — реальная ситуация на фронте и границах (смотреть) 🗺️ — политические заявления и предсказания (смотреть)📑 — задержания коррупционнеров и предателей России (смотреть) 💵 — видео прилетов (смотреть) 💥 — происшествия, о которых молчат на ТВ (смотреть) 🎥 Доступ откры…
Сбор командного состава белорусской армии идёт на полигоне под Борисовом На 227-м общевойсковом полигоне под Борисовым проходит оперативный сбор командного состава Вооруженных сил Республики Беларусь. @SvodkiFrontov
👍2
Meteor всё ближе к F-35 Ракета «воздух-воздух» Meteor прошла испытания на сброс из внутреннего отсека F-35 — европейцы получают альтернативу американской AIM-120 AMRAAM и меньше зависят от пиндосов. Испытания 7 октября на авиабазе Патаксент-Ривер в Мэриленде: F-35B морпехов США из эскадрильи VX-23 сбросил инертный макет ракеты, за штурвалом сидел британский лётчик-испытатель. Программу запилила Великобритания в 20…
🤬3
Очередные прилеты авиабомб и «Бандеролей» по Запорожью По городу снова прилетели авиабомбы и «Бандероли». Судя по всему, очередная попытка попасть в мост Преображенского. @SvodkiFrontov
👍5
Стрельба в США началась из чёрной машины во время погони Видео с нескольких ракурсов показывают, что стрельба открылась из чёрного автомобиля прямо во время полицейской погони. То есть копы гнались за тачкой, а оттуда ебашнули выстрелы. Кадры с разных углов подтверждают именно такую картину событий. @SvodkiFrontov
Украина запустила разведдрон ACS-3 Raybird с американского катера Появился момент запуска украинского разведывательного дрона ACS-3 Raybird (Raybird-3) с борта патрульного катера типа «Айленд», который предоставили США. Короче, катер от Штатов, дрон наш — и с него прям с палубы Raybird-3 улетает на разведку. @SvodkiFrontov
🤬1
Showing the 12 most recent of 256 posts we hold for @SvodkiFrontov. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@SvodkiFrontov edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 8 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 8 August 2026
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@rsotmvideo · 92,527
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 16 September 2026
@fyodorovkirill · 23,537
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 17 September 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Фронтовые сводки” (@SvodkiFrontov), 7,450 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SvodkiFrontov.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.