Photo, posted without a caption
👍2
Signed 小瑞 大王
![Telegram profile photo for T7[主频道]](https://cdn.tgregister.com/av/f3/f3d1f909eb9271e5499843d449f94346e5a00858101ef4005130b1f148fee0f5.jpg)
Channel
@T7NB669
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,838subscribers
+113 since we began measuring on 24 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002215766098 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @T7NB669 |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 24 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 31 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 31 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/T7NB669 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 31 Aug 2026, 07:13 | 2,838 | +35 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 15:03 | 2,803 | +64 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 20:33 | 2,739 | +14 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 21:00 | 2,725 | no change |
| 24 Aug 2026, 20:45 | 2,725 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 24 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (24 August 2026 – 24 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,154 |
| Reactions total | 56 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 24 Aug 2026, 21:00 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
56 reactions across 18 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 89.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 50 | 89.3% | |
| 👎 | 3 | 5.36% | |
| 😱 | 3 | 5.36% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 56 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 24 August 2026 to 24 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Photo, posted without a caption
👍2
Signed 小瑞 大王
我澄清一下 我骂的是一个叫什么苟什么学的 不是踏雪 你们不要再带节奏了 那个人跟踏雪用的名字差不多 我当时打错名字给他们了 不要再带节奏了 人家也给我们道歉了 没必要再管这件事了 注:我再次说明说的不是踏雪 你们在瞎鸡巴乱带节奏的后果自负
👎3
Signed 小瑞 大王
T7网络有限公司持续招收免费代理 可以发视频或直播就可以 可以对接卡网 一个月售卖卡金额达到1000既可奖励永久卡 联系 @T7NBH66
👍2
Signed T7客服 乖乖
宝宝们卡网已经补卡 速度提卡奔放💋 https://shop.368fk.cn/shop/T7NB669
👍2
Signed T7客服 乖乖
这个版本可以正常使用了 上个1.2的搞错了
👍4
Signed 小瑞 大王
T7-天神直装v1.2版本 T7官方引擎旗下的容器直装 1.引擎渲染采用多线程优化 稳定120帧 2.采用无痕裸奔HOOK 绕过游戏反检测 3.采用函数自瞄和函数追踪 枪枪到肉 拥有指哪打哪 4.功能具有裸奔广角以及直播漏手模式 5.拥有保存读取配置 天神直装提卡卡网 天神直装解绑地址 辅助问题联系作者 @BTXTW 售后问题联系客服 @T7NBH6
👍5
Signed 小瑞 大王
Photo, posted without a caption
👍4
Signed 小瑞 大王
MW代理道歉了 我们也谅解了 各位不要带节奏了
👍6
Signed 小瑞 大王
Photo, posted without a caption
👍2
Signed 小瑞 大王
T7网络有限公司持续招收免费代理 可以发视频或直播就可以 可以对接卡网 一个月售卖卡金额达到1000既可奖励永久卡 联系 @T7NBH66
👍2
Signed T7客服 乖乖
宝宝们卡网已经补卡 速度提卡奔放💋 https://shop.368fk.cn/shop/T7NB669
👍2
Signed T7客服 乖乖
Photo, posted without a caption
👍2😱2
Signed 小瑞 大王
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @T7NB669. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 389,441 of 1,630,085 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“T7[主频道]” (@T7NB669), 2,838 subscribers as measured 31 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/T7NB669.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.