Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for اطمَئن 🫀

Channel

اطمَئن 🫀

@T7_7M

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

13,244subscribers

-968 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001502305140
TypeChannel
Username@T7_7M
Description━━━━━━━ لـ #تواصل. @ok44ok
CreatedBetween 1 January 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live28 August 2026
Measurements held22
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 28 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/T7_7M

Growth

13,24414,21213,7286 August 2026 — 14,212 subscribers6 August 2026 — 13,903 subscribers7 August 2026 — 13,804 subscribers8 August 2026 — 13,761 subscribers9 August 2026 — 13,732 subscribers11 August 2026 — 13,703 subscribers12 August 2026 — 13,676 subscribers13 August 2026 — 13,651 subscribers14 August 2026 — 13,624 subscribers15 August 2026 — 13,585 subscribers16 August 2026 — 13,547 subscribers17 August 2026 — 13,536 subscribers18 August 2026 — 13,496 subscribers19 August 2026 — 13,482 subscribers20 August 2026 — 13,464 subscribers21 August 2026 — 13,431 subscribers23 August 2026 — 13,397 subscribers24 August 2026 — 13,353 subscribers25 August 2026 — 13,318 subscribers27 August 2026 — 13,288 subscribers27 August 2026 — 13,273 subscribers28 August 2026 — 13,244 subscribers6 August 202628 August 2026
22 measurements spanning 23 days, net -968. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,099–14,357 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 22
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
28 Aug 2026, 22:5613,244-29
27 Aug 2026, 23:3313,273-15
27 Aug 2026, 00:3813,288-30
25 Aug 2026, 21:2813,318-35
24 Aug 2026, 21:5713,353-44
23 Aug 2026, 07:2513,397-34
21 Aug 2026, 21:3513,431-33
20 Aug 2026, 15:3613,464-18
19 Aug 2026, 16:4613,482-14
18 Aug 2026, 19:5613,496-40
17 Aug 2026, 20:0413,536-11
16 Aug 2026, 21:5513,547-38
15 Aug 2026, 12:4313,585-39
14 Aug 2026, 04:1513,624-27
13 Aug 2026, 00:4813,651-25
12 Aug 2026, 00:2213,676-27
11 Aug 2026, 00:1813,703-29
9 Aug 2026, 22:1213,732-29
8 Aug 2026, 21:4613,761-43
7 Aug 2026, 20:3113,804first reading

Engagement

66 posts held, back to 16 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 42 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
3.39%
avg views ÷ 13,244 subscribers
Avg views / post
449
54 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.65%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
54
of 66 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held66 (16 June 202628 August 2026)
Views total24,235
Reactions total400
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Aug 2026, 06:20 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
7
Videos
12
Links
1

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 29 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

723 reactions across 66 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 73.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
53473.9%
👍506.92%
👏466.36%
❤‍🔥304.15%
💯202.77%
🕊152.07%
💔91.24%
🔥50.692%
🥰40.553%
👌30.415%
🤯30.415%
🙏20.277%
🤝20.277%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 66 of the 66 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 723reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 66 most recent posts we hold, published 16 June 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
6
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 66 we hold a reading for · 3%
Most on one post
4
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @T7_7M. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 66 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 16 June 2026 to 28 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 20:09 UTC124 views9 reactionsread 29 August 2026

وكأن السورة كلها تقول لك : ​لا تخف من الابتلاء... خف أن يكون قلبك متعلقاً بما يزول. ​" ابْنِ قلبك على الله وحده فقط . " ​واعلم أن كل شيء قد يسقط يوماً، أما من كان الله سنده فلن يضيع. ​فأقوى الناس ليس من لا تعصف به الحياة، وإنما من يبقى ثابتاً إذا عصفت به، لأنه يعلم أن قوة الإنسان ليست فيما يملك، بل في قوة تعلقه بربه سبحانه وتعالى.

4👏2❤‍🔥1💯1🕊1

28 Aug 2026, 20:08 UTC127 views7 reactionsread 29 August 2026

لأن الإنسان إذا بنى قلبه على ما يفنى، عاش قلقاً يخاف فقدانه. أما إذا كان تعلقه بالله أولاً، بقي ثابتاً حتى لو تغيرت ظروف الحياة كلها. ​ولهذا تذكر السورة قصص الأنبياء؛ نوحاً، وإبراهيم، ولوطاً، وشعيباً، وموسى عليهم السلام. ​لم يكن الأنبياء أقل الناس ابتلاءً، بل كانوا أكثرهم ابتلاءً، ومع ذلك كانوا أعظم الناس ثباتاً، لأن قوتهم لم تكن في خلو حياتهم من المصائب، بل في قوة صلتهم بالله كلما اشتدت عليهم الحياة. ​ثم تختم الس

3❤‍🔥1👏1💯1🕊1

28 Aug 2026, 20:08 UTC112 views6 reactionsread 29 August 2026

كل اعتماد على شيء زائل، إذا صار هو مصدر الأمان الحقيقي في قلب الإنسان، فإنه يشبه بيت العنكبوت؛ يبدو متماسكاً، لكنه لا يصمد أمام أول اختبار. ​كم من إنسان ظن أن ماله سيحميه... فضاع ماله. ​وكم من إنسان ظن أن منصبه سيدوم له... فانتهى منصبه. ​وكم من إنسان بنى قيمته كلها على إعجاب الناس به... فتغيرت قلوب الناس في لحظة. ​ليس لأن الدنيا ظالمة، ولكن لأن كل ما فيها زائل. ​ولهذا فالسؤال الحقيقي ليس: ماذا تملك؟ ​بل: على ماذ

2❤‍🔥1👏1💯1🕊1

28 Aug 2026, 20:06 UTC104 views6 reactionsread 29 August 2026

​ثم تضرب السورة مثلاً عظيماً : ​﴿مَثَلُ الَّذِينَ اتَّخَذُوا مِنْ دُونِ اللَّهِ أَوْلِيَاءَ كَمَثَلِ الْعَنْكَبُوتِ اتَّخَذَتْ بَيْتًا وَإِنَّ أَوْهَنَ الْبيُوتِ لَبَيْتُ الْعَنْكَبُوتِ﴾ ​والمعنى الأصلي للآية أن من يجعل اعتماده وولاءه لغير الله، فقد تعلق بما لا يملك له نفعاً ولا ضراًّ.

👍21👏1💯1🕊1

28 Aug 2026, 20:06 UTC105 views6 reactionsread 29 August 2026

ولهذا، عندما تأتي أول خسارة، أو أول خيبة أمل، أو أول صدمة، يتساءل بعض الناس: لماذا أنا؟ ولماذا يحدث هذا وأنا أحاول أن أكون صالحًا ؟ ​فتأتي سورة العنكبوت لتعلمنا أن الابتلاء ليس علامة على أن الله ترك عبده، بل قد يكون تربية له، ورفعًا لدرجته، وتكفيرًا لذنوبه، واختبارًا يكشف حقيقة قلبه.

👍21❤‍🔥1👏1🕊1

28 Aug 2026, 20:05 UTC111 views6 reactionsread 29 August 2026

المشكلة ليست في وجود الابتلاء، فالابتلاء سنة من سنن الله في هذه الحياة. وإنما المشكلة في تصورنا الخاطئ للحياة. نريد الإيمان دون اختبار، ونريد الجنة دون مجاهدة، ونريد النتائج دون أن نسلك الطريق الذي يوصل إليها .

👍21❤‍🔥1👏1💯1

28 Aug 2026, 20:04 UTC117 views6 reactionsread 29 August 2026

لكن سورة العنكبوت جاءت منذ بدايتها لتكسر هذا الوهم، فلم تبدأ بالحديث عن النصر، ولا عن الفرج، ولا عن المكافآت، بل بدأت بسؤال يهز القلب: ​﴿أَحَسِبَ النَّاسُ أَنْ يُتْرَكُوا أَنْ يَقُولُوا آمَنَّا وَهُمْ لَا يُفْتَنُونَ ۝ وَلَقَدْ فَتَنَّا الَّذِينَ مِنْ قَبْلِهِمْ فَلَيَعْلَمَنَّ اللَّهُ الَّذِينَ صَدَقُوا وَلَيَعْلَمَنَّ الْكَاذِبِينَ﴾ ​السورة تقول لك: هل ظننت أن مجرد قولك: "آمنت" يكفي؟ وأن طريق الإيمان لن يختبر صد

2💯2❤‍🔥1🕊1

28 Aug 2026, 20:04 UTC116 views6 reactionsread 29 August 2026

​لماذا ينهار بعض الناس عند أول ابتلاء... بينما يخرج آخرون من أشد المحن أكثر قوة؟ ​" الجواب قد تجده في سورة واحدة... سورة العنكبوت. " هناك وهم يعيشه كثير من الناس دون أن يشعروا به، وهو أن الإيمان يعني حياةً بلا مشكلات، وأن القرب من الله يعني اختفاء الابتلاءات، وأن الطريق المستقيم لا بد أن يكون طريقًا مريحًا...

2❤‍🔥1👏1💯1🕊1

26 Aug 2026, 00:38 UTC307 views15 reactionsread 29 August 2026

​لا تجعل اختلاف الأرزاق يحول حياتك إلى سباق مع الآخرين. ​ليس مطلوبًا أن تتزوج في عمرهم... ولا أن تملك ما يملكون... ولا أن تصل في الوقت الذي وصلوا فيه. ​اسعْ، واعمل، واطلب الرزق من الله، لكن لا تجعل المقارنة تفسد عليك ما لديك. ​فربما أنت تنظر إلى نعمة عند شخص آخر وتتمنى حياته... ​وفي حياتك أنت نعمٌ يتمنى غيرك واحدةً منها.

8❤‍🔥2👏2🙏2💯1

26 Aug 2026, 00:37 UTC292 views9 reactionsread 29 August 2026

قال الله تعالى: ﴿وَهُوَ الَّذِي جَعَلَكُمْ خَلَائِفَ الْأَرْضِ وَرَفَعَ بَعْضَكُمْ فَوْقَ بَعْضٍ دَرَجَاتٍ لِيَبْلُوَكُمْ فِي مَا أَتَاكُمْ﴾ ​وهنا تتغير نظرتك للرزق... ​ما أُعطيته ليس فقط نعمة تستمتع بها، بل اختبار أيضاً. ​فالذي أُعطي الكثير سيُختبر فيما أُعطي. ​والسؤال ليس فقط: لماذا يملك غيري أكثر مني؟ بل: ماذا سأفعل أنا بما أعطاني الله؟

5❤‍🔥1👏1💯1🕊1

26 Aug 2026, 00:36 UTC267 views11 reactionsread 29 August 2026

والرزق ليس مالاً فقط. ​قد يملك شخص مالاً كثيراً ويفتقد الصحة. ​وقد يملك آخر بيتاً صغيراً وقلباً مطمئناً. ​وقد يتمنى شخص الأولاد، بينما شخص آخر يعيش هذه النعمة كل يوم حتى اعتادها ​وقد يبحث إنسان عن عمل، بينما آخر يملك وظيفة كان يدعو الله بها يوماً ثم أصبح لا يرى إلا تعبها. ​نحن غالباً نقارن أنفسنا بالناس في الشيء الذي ينقصنا... ولا نقارنهم بنا في النعم التي نملكها.

7💯2👏1🕊1

26 Aug 2026, 00:35 UTC257 views10 reactionsread 29 August 2026

قال الله تعالى: ﴿وَلَا تَتَمَنَّوْا مَا فَضَّلَ اللَّهُ بِهِ بَعْضَكُمْ عَلَى بَعْضٍ﴾ ​قد تنظر إلى نعمة عند شخص وتتمنى أن تكون لك... ​لكن أنت ترى النعمة فقط. ​لا ترى مسؤوليتها... ولا ابتلاءها... ولا بقية حياته التي لا يعرضها لك. ​لذلك لا تجعل ما عند غيرك يُنسيك ما وضعه الله بين يديك.

❤‍🔥42👏2👍1💯1

Showing the 12 most recent of 66 posts we hold for @T7_7M. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 128,804 of 1,625,404entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“اطمَئن 🫀” (@T7_7M), 13,244 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/T7_7M.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.