भारत की सबसे बड़ी पोर्न साइट (Apple वर्शन) https://ourl.cn/U4faEb
🍌42🤣19😁13🤔10❤6🙈5🌚3🐳1

Channel
@TCofficialschannel
On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Domains linked from posts · Cite this entry
69,825subscribers
-4,460 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001831897161 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @TCofficialschannel |
| Description | TC Lottery Official Channel |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 32 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/TCofficialschannel |
Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 82% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear word for word on 3 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @goldentcwinner/10303326 Oct 2025, 13:47 UTC | @TCofficialschannel/58129 · this entry26 Oct 2025, 13:55 UTC | 1.00 | 7 minutes |
| @goldentcwinner/10303411 Dec 2025, 17:11 UTC | @TCofficialschannel/58130 · this entry11 Dec 2025, 17:18 UTC | 1.00 | 7 minutes |
| @goldentcwinner/10304626 Jan 2026, 12:33 UTC | @TCofficialschannel/58141 · this entry26 Jan 2026, 12:33 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @TCofficialschannel/58142 · this entry28 Jan 2026, 08:27 UTC | @goldentcwinner/10304728 Jan 2026, 08:27 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @TCofficialschannel/58143 · this entry30 Jan 2026, 07:29 UTC | @goldentcwinner/10304830 Jan 2026, 07:29 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @tclotteryvipdaniel/27219326 Jan 2026, 12:33 UTC | @TCofficialschannel/58141 · this entry26 Jan 2026, 12:33 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @goldentcwinner | 12 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | @goldentcwinner (10–2) |
| @tclotteryvipdaniel | 10 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | this entry (9–1) |
| @tc_platfrom | 10 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | @tc_platfrom (10–0) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 18 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 18 comparable posts for this entry, running 26 October 2025 to 23 July 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Across the whole group of 4, the earliest publisher we hold is @goldentcwinner. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_source, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 3 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 09:15 | 69,825 | -201 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 02:01 | 70,026 | -116 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 09:39 | 70,142 | -148 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 17:36 | 70,290 | -235 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 18:55 | 70,525 | -345 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 14:39 | 70,870 | -440 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 18:40 | 71,310 | -125 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 02:14 | 71,435 | -137 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 01:43 | 71,572 | -107 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 03:48 | 71,679 | -140 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 00:04 | 71,819 | -144 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 00:43 | 71,963 | -97 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 03:44 | 72,060 | -76 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 01:04 | 72,136 | -79 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 22:44 | 72,215 | -73 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 22:13 | 72,288 | -108 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 22:58 | 72,396 | -229 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 08:25 | 72,625 | -119 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 21:36 | 72,744 | -96 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 20:33 | 72,840 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 26 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 97 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (26 October 2025 – 4 September 2026) |
| Views total | 3,920 |
| Reactions total | 100 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 23 Sept 2026, 13:30 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 23 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
672 reactions across 18 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 358 | 53.3% | |
| 🍌 | 115 | 17.1% | |
| 🤡 | 48 | 7.14% | |
| 🤣 | 45 | 6.70% | |
| 😭 | 33 | 4.91% | |
| 🤔 | 21 | 3.13% | |
| 😁 | 14 | 2.08% | |
| 👍 | 13 | 1.93% | |
| 🥰 | 6 | 0.893% | |
| 🔥 | 5 | 0.744% | |
| 😢 | 5 | 0.744% | |
| 🙈 | 5 | 0.744% | |
| 🌚 | 3 | 0.446% | |
| 🐳 | 1 | 0.149% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 672 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 26 October 2025 to 4 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
भारत की सबसे बड़ी पोर्न साइट (Apple वर्शन) https://ourl.cn/U4faEb
🍌42🤣19😁13🤔10❤6🙈5🌚3🐳1
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 17 months. If they remain inactive for the next 19 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
🔥 Hey WinPay Fam!🔥 Aaj ka FREE Reward miss mat karo 🎁😎 🤖 WinPay Bot use karo Bas ek click 🤖 aur image + message turant pao 🤖 ❌ No editing ❌ No waiting ❌ No headache 💎 Image & message copy karo 📤 WhatsApp, Telegram, Facebook – kahin bhi share karo 💰 Bonus directly tumhare WinPay wallet mein add Koi confusion nahi ❌ Koi “bhai mera bonus kab milega?” nahi ❌ Simple. Fast. Trusted. 💯 💸 Share karo. Earn karo. Chill ka…
❤71😭33🥰5👍2🔥2
💸 Want easy money without doing “hard work”? Say hello to WinPay! 😎 Just share WinPay posts on social media and earn up to ₹177 FREE bonus 🤑 Yes, FREE. No jugaad, no investment, no tension. 💰 Bonus goes directly to your WinPay account No waiting like train delays 🚆, no drama like daily serials 📺 🟢 How to earn? Even your chai break is enough ☕️ 1️⃣ Open the WinPay Bot and get today’s post image + caption 2️⃣ Post i…
❤23
💚 WINPAY – Apne Free Time Se Kamao Extra Income 💚 👉 Paise ki tension? Ghar ka kharcha badhta ja raha hai? Ab sirf ek mobile aur thoda sa free time use karke daily 1000 se 3000 INR kamaana mumkin hai! 🔥 WINPAY ek aisa commission-based earning app hai jo students, housewives, job seekers aur financially struggling logon ke liye specially banaya gaya hai. 💰 WINPAY Kyun Choose Karein? ✅ Koi investment nahi – bilkul F…
❤20🍌5🔥2🤔2
😆 New User Special Offer | Register karo, turant kamao!😆 Ab wait kyun? Naye users ke liye REAL cash rewards! 🎖️ Register karte hi ₹1️⃣7️⃣7️⃣ FREE Koi trick nahi, sign-up ke baad direct milta hai. New users ke liye limited offer! 💘 Simple tasks, double earning ✅ 15 tasks complete karo 💲 ₹2️⃣0️⃣0️⃣ EXTRA turant ✅ 35 tasks complete karo 💲 Aur ₹1️⃣0️⃣0️⃣ CASH bonus 📈 Total earning ₹1️⃣0️⃣0️⃣0️⃣+ tak Easy kaam, zero…
❤23
🌟 New User Special Offer – Start Earning Instantly! 🌟 🎁 Register now & get ₹177 FREE bonus instantly ✅ Complete simple beginner tasks and earn ₹200 extra 🪙 7-Day Task Reward Program 💰 Earn ₹100 on Day 1 itself! 💸 Get extra income through order commissions 🟢 Total earning potential: ₹1,000+ and more 💼 No experience required 📱 Work anytime, anywhere – just your mobile & free time 🔥 Easy tasks | Real cash rewards | …
❤10👍2
💚 WINPAY – Apne Free Time Se Kamao Extra Income 💚 👉 Paise ki tension? Ghar ka kharcha badhta ja raha hai? Ab sirf ek mobile aur thoda sa free time use karke daily 1000 se 3000 INR kamaana mumkin hai! 🔥 WINPAY ek aisa commission-based earning app hai jo students, housewives, job seekers aur financially struggling logon ke liye specially banaya gaya hai. 💰 WINPAY Kyun Choose Karein? ✅ Koi investment nahi – bilkul F…
❤7🤔3
Hey dear WinPay users 😄 Don’t forget to use our WinPay Bot to share posts and get today’s FREE reward 🎁 👉 No need to edit anything ✋ Bas click karein 👉 📌 Image aur message prapt karein 📋 Copy the received image & message 📤 Share it anywhere 💰 The bonus you earn is directly added to your WinPay account balance No waiting, no confusion, no “bhai mera bonus kahan hai?” 😂 Easy hai, fast hai, bilkul tension-free 😎 Sh…
🤡8❤6
💸 Want easy money without hard work? Say hello to WinPay 😎 📲 Just share a post 🎁 Earn up to ₹177 FREE every day ❌ No investment · ❌ No tricks · ❌ No stress 💰 Rewards go directly to your WinPay account Fast. Simple. No waiting 🚀 🟢 How it works (4 easy steps): 1️⃣ Open the WinPay Bot and get today’s post image + caption 2️⃣ Post it publicly on Facebook / Instagram / Twitter / Telegram 3️⃣ Submit your post link + pho…
❤11🤣4
💸 Want easy money without hard work? Say hello to WinPay 😎 📲 Just share a post 🎁 Earn up to ₹177 FREE every day ❌ No investment · ❌ No tricks · ❌ No stress 💰 Rewards go directly to your WinPay account Fast. Simple. No waiting 🚀 🟢 How it works (4 easy steps): 1️⃣ Open the WinPay Bot and get today’s post image + caption 2️⃣ Post it publicly on Facebook / Instagram / Twitter / Telegram 3️⃣ Submit your post link + pho…
❤14
🚀 Important Update: Reward Upgrade! 🎉 New members get ₹177💵 WinPay upon registration! 👑 Fast · Fun · Free ✨ Register now and receive your ₹177 bonus instantly! 💥 Simply register and get ₹177 as a reward, credited quickly! 🟢 Join now and start earning rewards instantly! Click here 📱📱📱 📱📱📱 Publish & Share ₹17-177 🥰Follow WINPAY for more benefits and events ⬇️ Download 📱 Telegram 📱WhatsApp 📞 Online customer serv
❤6🍌2
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @TCofficialschannel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
3 domains this channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“TC LOTTERY OFFICIAL” (@TCofficialschannel), 69,825 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TCofficialschannel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.