12 measurements spanning 34 days, net -52. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,151–8,221 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Sept 2026, 19:56
8,159
-18
3 Sept 2026, 08:36
8,177
-13
31 Aug 2026, 06:25
8,190
-20
28 Aug 2026, 02:03
8,210
-3
24 Aug 2026, 16:19
8,213
+7
21 Aug 2026, 02:02
8,206
+5
18 Aug 2026, 09:18
8,201
-7
15 Aug 2026, 00:35
8,208
+3
12 Aug 2026, 02:03
8,205
-4
9 Aug 2026, 05:51
8,209
-2
6 Aug 2026, 03:03
8,211
no change
5 Aug 2026, 22:45
8,211
first reading
Engagement
32 posts held, back to 17 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 21 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
16.8%
avg views ÷ 8,159 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,370
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.50%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 32 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held
32 (17 July 2026 – 28 August 2026)
Views total
15,119
Reactions total
378
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
28 Aug 2026, 18:18 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
3m 32s
Average length
53s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,056 reactions across 32 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤🔥
395
37.4%
🔥
321
30.4%
custom 5465506576066452243
157
14.9%
💯
58
5.49%
👀
56
5.30%
🍓
27
2.56%
💔
17
1.61%
🗿
16
1.52%
💋
7
0.663%
🤡
2
0.189%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 32 of the 32 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,056 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 32 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 32 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @TDvTG. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 32 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 17 July 2026 to 28 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Нет, не все!
🔻Есть совсем немного аббревиатур, которые пишутся строчными: вуз, загс, дзот.
🔻В остальном же аббревиатуры пишутся с заглавных букв без точек: ОМС, ДМС, ВИА, ТАСС.
📎 ЗАГС, кстати, допустимо писать и заглавными, и строчными.
Аббревиатуры склоняются🆎 Да, в некоторых случаях.
«Словарь грамматических вариантов русского языка» Л. К. Граудиной, В. А. Ицковича и Л. П. Катлинской (М., 2008) рекомендует скло…
Уже совсем скоро мы раскроем главную тайну! 🆎
5 сентября подключайтесь к осеннему онлайн-марафону Фонда «Тотальный диктант». В этом году он приурочен сразу к двум праздникам, которые отмечаются 8 сентября, — Международному дню грамотности и Дню языков народов России.
🆎🆎🆎 🆎🆎🆎 🆎🆎🆎🆎🆎
Онлайн-марафон начнется в 11:00 мск и продлится до 16:00. Мы будем вести трансляцию из Улан-Удэ, столицы акции в 2026 году.
📎 В ходе ма…
Начинаем трансляцию «Олдскульного диктанта» через 15 минут🆎
➡️Как поучаствовать?
Заходите на наш сайт и пишите под диктовку известного российского актера театра и кино Ефима Шифрина, сыгравшего в сериале «Олдскул» Леонида — возлюбленного Марии Павловны и нового завхоза школы.
Диктант можно написать и позже, мы сохраним запись 🆎
Механика написания для всех участников будет такая же, как на традиционном Тотальном ди…
Друзья, уже завтра в 19:30 мск совместно с онлайн-кинотеатрами START и PREMIER мы проведем первый всероссийский «Олдскульный диктант»!
Напомним, акция приурочена к премьере второго сезона одного из самых успешных проектов 2025 года: сериала «Олдскул» о жизни Марии Павловны Трифоновой — учительницы математики старой закалки в современной элитной школе, — а также к началу нового учебного года.
✍ Как поучаствовать?
На…
Друзья, совместно с онлайн-кинотеатрами START и PREMIER мы проведем первый всероссийский «Олдскульный диктант»!
📎 26 августа 2026 года в семи российских городах очно и в режиме онлайн по всей России пройдет «Олдскульный диктант» — совместный проект Фонда поддержки языковой культуры граждан «Тотальный диктант» и онлайн-кинотеатров START и PREMIER.
Акция приурочена к премьере второго сезона одного из самых успешных п…
Ну, заец, ну, погоди! Почему мы вообще пишем «заяц», а не «заец»?
Да-да, могло быть и так! Когда проводили мероприятия в Костроме перед стратсессией, решили рассказать вам об этом интересном факте🆎
Проект Фонда «Тотальный диктант» для носителей национальных языков России «Тот.Язык» стал победителем регионального этапа Международной премии #МЫВМЕСТЕ в номинации «Сила единства»! В этой категории, учрежденной в рамках Года единства народов, было представлено более 1000 проектов. Впереди еще два этапа конкурса: полуфинал и финал, который будет включать в себя народное голосование.
📎 Премия #МЫВМЕСТЕ отмечает лучши…
Ты пишешь «С уважением», но делаешь это без уважения… Но об этом никто не узнает, потому что это стандартная подпись в твоей почте ✉️
Всегда ли уместна этикетная формула «С уважением» или ее можно заменить? И нужна ли запятая после нее?
➡️ Мы начали письмо с обращения «Уважаемый_______!» — и тогда «С уважением» звучит как тавтология. Это не страшно: уважения много не бывает.
Но еще можно написать:
🔻 Искренне Ваш,…
❤🔥44💯8👀6🔥5custom 54655065760664522432
Showing the 12 most recent of 32 posts we hold for @TDvTG. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The 5 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 32 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 28 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cross-platform identity — Wikidata
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Тот самый телеграм-канал | Тотальный диктант” (@TDvTG), 8,159 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TDvTG.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
