Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
29 measurements spanning 35 days, net -148. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 20,042–20,388 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 29
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
10 Sept 2026, 02:55
20,200
+72
6 Sept 2026, 18:00
20,128
+43
4 Sept 2026, 05:15
20,085
+3
2 Sept 2026, 21:14
20,082
-8
1 Sept 2026, 16:54
20,090
-32
31 Aug 2026, 15:54
20,122
+4
30 Aug 2026, 12:48
20,118
-7
29 Aug 2026, 16:13
20,125
-17
28 Aug 2026, 16:13
20,142
+14
27 Aug 2026, 13:54
20,128
+12
26 Aug 2026, 16:49
20,116
-4
25 Aug 2026, 16:34
20,120
-19
24 Aug 2026, 16:25
20,139
-38
22 Aug 2026, 21:34
20,177
-11
21 Aug 2026, 08:42
20,188
-6
20 Aug 2026, 11:56
20,194
-35
19 Aug 2026, 09:15
20,229
+2
18 Aug 2026, 10:12
20,227
+27
17 Aug 2026, 10:38
20,200
-32
15 Aug 2026, 19:03
20,232
first reading
Engagement
118 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 57 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
25.7%
avg views ÷ 20,200 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,200
86 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.07%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
87
of 118 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 84 of 86 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held
118 (31 July 2026 – 2 September 2026)
Views total
446,840
Reactions total
4,674
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
3 Sept 2026, 00:57 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
7m 55s
Average length
1m 59s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
6,418 reactions across 109 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
2,387
37.2%
😁
1,184
18.4%
👍
1,152
17.9%
🔥
1,023
15.9%
💯
341
5.31%
👏
145
2.26%
👎
61
0.95%
🏆
45
0.701%
🤝
30
0.467%
😍
18
0.28%
👀
16
0.249%
😎
15
0.234%
👌
1
0.016%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 114 of the 118 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7,209 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 118 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 116 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @TESTLIDER. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 118 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 July 2026 to 2 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
O‘quvchilarning maqsadi ham har xil ekan
“Uchinchi”, “To‘rtinchi” guruhdagilarning 76 foizi – Milliy sertifikat, 61 foizi – attestatsiya, 22 foizi – Vazir jamg‘armasi, 8 foizi – olimpiada, 1 foizi esa yozgi kirish imtihoniga tayyorlanmoqda.
Maqsadlar har xil. Talab bitta – tarixni puxta o‘rganish. Buning uchun – Jalol BOLTAYEV onlayn kursi.
👉 @TESTLIDER
⚡️ 80 ming so‘m evaziga Jalol Boltayevda 1 oy tahsil olish imkoniyati!
Guruhga kirish narxi 200 ming so‘m. Ammo guruhga qo‘shilganlarga 3 ta “Kundalik-optimal” kitobi va imzoli ruchka sovg‘a qilinadi.
Bu sovg‘alarning o‘zi men uchun yuborish xarajatlari bilan 120 ming so‘mga tushadi. Demak, aslida siz 80 ming so‘m evaziga 1 oy tahsil olyapsiz.
“Kundalik-optimal”dan foydalanganlar uning qadrini yaxshi biladi. Bu ki…
Tarix fanini shu paytgacha maxsus tarzda umuman o‘rganmagan o‘quvchilar diqqatiga!
Agar sizga tarix fanidan sertifikat asosiy fan sifatida kerak bo‘lsa, oktyabr oyidagi imtihonga shoshilmaslikni tavsiya qilaman.
Ijtimoiy tarmoqlardagi “mutlaq noldan 1 haftada A+, 1 oyda A+” kabi gaplarga uchmang. Ha, menda ham mutlaq boshlang‘ich nuqtadan 1 oyda yuqori natija olgan o‘quvchilar bo‘lgan. Lekin ular umumiy o‘quvchilar…
SO‘NGGI IMKONIYAT!
Aslida “Uchinchi guruh”ga 31-avgustgacha qo‘shilganlarga 3 ta kitob + imzoli ruchka sovg‘a qilishni rejalashtirgandik.
Lekin ko‘pchilik so‘ragani uchun bugun ham qo‘shilganlarga sovg‘alarni yuboradigan bo‘ldik.
Guruhga keyinchalik ham qo‘shilish mumkin, ammo kitob va imzoli ruchka sovg‘a qilinmaydi.
To‘g‘ri tushuning, kitoblarni yuborish uchun har kuni pochtaga borib-kelish imkonimiz yo‘q. Shu …
Jalol Boltayev kursining repetitorlar hamjamiyati
Qariyb 10 yillik repetitorlik faoliyatim davomida to‘plagan tajribamni endi kursimda tahsil olayotgan repetitorlar bilan alohida yopiq guruhda bo‘lishmoqchiman.
Bu guruhda o‘quvchilar oldida aytib bo‘lmaydigan, dars jarayonida ko‘rinmaydigan repetitorlikning ichki jihatlari, yillar davomida shakllangan qarashlarim, turli vaziyatlarda sinab ko‘rgan usullarim, yo‘l qo…
“Oktyabrchilar” va “Dekabrchilar” guruhiga qo‘shilganlarga 3 ta “Kundalik-optimal” kitobi va imzoli ruchka sovg‘a qilinishidan xabaringiz bor.
Barchaga sovg‘alarni “Uzpost” pochtasi orqali yuboramiz. Lekin xorazmliklar o‘quv markazimga kelib, o‘zlari olib ketishlari ham mumkin. Qaytanga, bu bizga ham yaxshiroq bo‘lardi. :)
Bunda yana men bilan rasmga tushish baxtiga ham musharraf bo‘lishingiz mumkin. 😄
Kursga qabu…
Yangi o‘quv dasturlari muhokamasi: huquq fani o‘quv dasturi o‘z maqsadini o‘zi rad etyapti
O‘quv dasturi – muayyan fan bo‘yicha o‘quvchiga nimalarni o‘rgatish va unda qanday bilim, ko‘nikma va kompetensiyalarni shakllantirish kerakligini belgilab beradigan asosiy hujjat.
Ya’ni, sodda qilib aytganda, o‘quv dasturi maktabda nimani o‘qitishimiz va ta’lim natijasida qanday o‘quvchini shakllantirishimiz kerakligini belgi…
Bu o‘quvchim Qashqadaryodan edi. Bu yil diplomatiyada grant asosida talaba bo‘ldi. Balki, shunday natijalar kursimda qashqadaryoliklar sonining tobora ko‘payib borishiga sabab bo‘layotgandir.
“Uchinchi guruh”ga tezroq qo‘shiling!
Bugun-erta qo‘shilmasangiz, 3 ta kitob + imzoli ruchkadan iborat sovg‘adan quruq qolishingiz mumkin.
Keyin bu sovg‘alar berilmaydi.
Murojaat uchun: @jalolboltayev_kurs
Showing the 12 most recent of 118 posts we hold for @TESTLIDER. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@TESTLIDER edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
25 August 2026
Most recent edit
25 August 2026
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Hozirda 2 ta guruhim bor. Ikkalasi ham endi “Tezkor” formatida, ya’ni kuzgi “MS” va attestatsiya imtihonlariga qadar tayyorgarlikni yakunlashni maqsad qilgan.
Endi 3-guruhni qaysi formatda ochgan ma’qul, deb o‘ylayapman...
Tezkor – kuzgi imtihonlarga qadar tayyor bo‘lamiz.53%
6 oylik – shoshilmasdan, sekinlashtirilgan tempda tayyorlanamiz.20%
Tezkor + 6 oylik – guruh umumiy bo‘ladi, o‘quvchining maqsadiga qarab ikkala tempga ham moslashadi.26%
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 118 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 2 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@TESTLIDER named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@sarvinoz_shavkatqizi named in 1 post, 16 August 2026 – 16 August 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Tarix Milliy Sertifikat @Tarix_Milliy_Sertifikatl · 40,939 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 30 August 2026
TARIXDAN TOMCHI @tarixdan_tomchi · 53,675 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 24 August 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝗧𝗘𝗦𝗧 𝗟𝗜𝗗𝗘𝗥 | JALOL BOLTAYEV” (@TESTLIDER), 20,200 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TESTLIDER.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.