Channel
@TF2coolgamegg
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
105subscribers
+3 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002223526859 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @TF2coolgamegg |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 3 times, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/TF2coolgamegg |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1 Sept 2026, 02:15 | 105 | +1 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 22:07 | 104 | -1 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 13:47 | 105 | +3 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 10:02 | 102 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 09:47 | 102 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 25 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
64 reactions across 9 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 24 | 37.5% | |
| 🥰 | 13 | 20.3% | |
| 🍌 | 10 | 15.6% | |
| 🔥 | 9 | 14.1% | |
| ❤🔥 | 5 | 7.81% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 3.13% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 1.56% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 64 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Предварительное сравнение меня не порадовало Так как прошлый Л получился в раз лучше, изящнее. Волосы и глаза особенно понравились Но и в этот раз я не так сильно на референс опиралась, хотелось как будто бы по памяти его слепить В чём новый Л точно лучше, так это в крыльях Примерив к телу, я оказалась крайне довольна Ещё забавно, что размеры могилки почти 1 в 1) я никаких замеров не делала, всё на глаз
❤🔥5❤2🔥2
Один в один почти
❤10🔥1🥰1
100 подписчиков + 100 лет её знаю Хорошо рисует так ещё и мой реквест с босс мгс3 выполнила офигеть
🥰3
♥️🌰™️🥑 Вас уже сотня! Моих самых любимых и преданных подписчиков 👀 В честь такого события устраиваю небольшую лотерею. Правила просты: 1. Быть подписчиком моего канала 2. Написать в порядке очереди номер в комментариях (первый комментарий "Ура, 1", второй "Участвую, 2" и т.д.) 3. репост куда угодно (не обязательно, но у тех кто это сделает считайте 2 билета и следовательно 2х шанс. Прикрепляйте скрин вместе с ци…
🥰5🔥2🙏1
Я смотрю на это и понимаю По сути на 1 фото такие же пропорции, как и на 2 Просто там носок находится на подъёме, как во время ходьбы А голень получилась слишком длинной Хз чё я тогда голову всем морочу
🔥4
Какие пропорции круче?
The shares total 107%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Уже всех докопала, но всё же Примерила голову от одного другому. Давно думала о том, чтобы делать тела для чиби больше, чем делаю сейчас. Появилась возможность лицезреть наяву Вам какие пропорции ближе для глаза? 1 - предположительный новый вариант 2-4 - базовый вариант У меня как будто душа лежит больше ко 2-4 вариантам, но формат чиби я использую только из-за удобства. Лепить фулл с нормальными пропорциями - дол…
❤5👍2🥰2
Безумно рассержена на себя Делаю фигурку уже во второй раз, а ошибки всё те же Не могла подумать над этим перед тем, как делать!? Ну что за идиотизм! Колени опять не так согнуты, линия тела тоже идёт неправильно Самый настоящий позор! Думала я самая умная, недочёты все исправить смогу, шедевр выдам Крайне недальновидно! Ужасно халатно отнеслась!
🍌10❤2🥰2
Какой
The shares total 118%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
❤2
Давайте вброс сделаю без объяснений Какая поза лучше?
❤3
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @TF2coolgamegg. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Какие пропорции круче?
The shares total 107%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Какой
The shares total 118%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Адский загадочник 2008” (@TF2coolgamegg), 105 subscribers as measured 1 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TF2coolgamegg.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.