Channel
@TGW457
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
489subscribers
-10 since we began measuring on 26 October 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002469496283 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @TGW457 |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 26 October 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 3 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 3 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/TGW457 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 3 Nov 2026, 07:36 | 489 | -10 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 00:09 | 499 | no change |
| 26 Oct 2026, 07:22 | 499 | first reading |
5 posts held, back to 11 October 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 5 (11 October 2026 – 26 October 2026) |
| Views total | 2,440 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 26 Oct 2026, 07:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 5 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
#黑平台 我在Y3-国际平台投注足球，盈利2000U后申请提现，却被拒绝。客服随后表示不能下注小赛事。既然平台不允许投注，为什么相关赛事和玩法仍出现在投注页面？玩家按平台提供的选项下注，最后却受限制，责任该由谁承担？ 更难以接受的是，我第一天投注小赛事时明明亏损了，平台并未提醒不能下注；直到盈利后申请提现，才以此为由拒绝。客服称平台规则早有说明，但玩家是否必须在下注前逐字阅读所有资料，才能避免正常投注事后受限？ 平台规则似乎在玩家亏损时不被提起，盈利后却成了拒绝提现的理由。这种做法让人质疑：是不是大字吸睛、小字免责？ 玩平台多年，第一次遇到这样的规定。即便直接封禁账号，也好过事后拿规则限制提现。各位老铁注意避雷：Y3-国际，谨慎选择！
我前几年在 #万达哈希 玩输了有差不多四十万，后面借了几年，今年看到朋友还在玩哈希，搞的我心痒痒，又去跟着玩哈希，因为我以前在这个台子玩过，所以想着玩老平台，结果大额赢了不返奖，后面看到曝光频道很多人曝光他黑款，我就知道我也被黑了，现在客服直接不回复了
#环海铂菜娱乐 赢钱不让提现 说储值50% 打三倍流水就可以全额提款了呢流水才能提现 能别玩的就别玩了
#黑台子 #8K #8K国际 #黑平台 #曝光 #杀猪盘 2026年10月13日注册了8K，客户充值500U打到2100u，而且客户打的是加拿大下注都是组合，妈的啥时候彩票也开始黑钱了，客户说申请提现2个小时没有到账，问客服为什么没出款8K官方客户一句话：系统检测到账号存在异常，扣除金额后冻结账号，叫他找出原因也说无法查出原因，然后账号直接被冻结，无法登录，这他妈的就是一定要找一个理由黑钱呗 玩不起开什么平台 不是这问题就是那问题，反正你们说啥就是啥呗 呼吁全网 抵制黑平台8K网址 真的恶心 都别玩这个台子 看到的都转发一下，避免更多人被杀猪 ！
#曝光 #亚游集团 提现要保证金 流水随意加码 充值投注均正常，盈利提现却突然要求先交保证金、再补额外流水才给出款！问规则客服含糊其辞，款项长期拖延无解 —— 摆明不想给钱！正常平台提现从不额外收费，要钱的全是黑盘！别再投钱，保存记录，尽快止损！
Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @TGW457. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“黑平台发布” (@TGW457), 489 subscribers as measured 3 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TGW457.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.