Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
55 measurements spanning 85 days, net -53. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 24,983–38,095 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 55
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
31 Oct 2026, 20:29
29,853
-475
30 Oct 2026, 22:28
30,328
-520
30 Oct 2026, 01:30
30,848
-373
28 Oct 2026, 23:51
31,221
-685
27 Oct 2026, 20:20
31,906
-318
26 Oct 2026, 17:16
32,224
-579
25 Oct 2026, 17:48
32,803
-381
24 Oct 2026, 14:16
33,184
-611
23 Oct 2026, 17:15
33,795
-374
22 Oct 2026, 20:19
34,169
-984
21 Oct 2026, 15:17
35,153
-504
20 Oct 2026, 09:54
35,657
+515
19 Oct 2026, 06:54
35,142
+8,646
18 Oct 2026, 08:50
26,496
-399
17 Oct 2026, 07:46
26,895
-706
16 Oct 2026, 08:58
27,601
-209
15 Oct 2026, 08:15
27,810
-534
14 Oct 2026, 09:59
28,344
-693
12 Oct 2026, 22:16
29,037
-1,923
8 Oct 2026, 13:15
30,960
first reading
Engagement
823 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 153 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
0.2%
avg views ÷ 29,853 subscribers
Avg views / post
59.8
283 posts measured
Reaction rate
83.3%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
283
of 823 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 271 of 283 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 October 2026
Posts held
823 (7 August 2026 – 31 October 2026)
Views total
16,931
Reactions total
13,952
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
1 Nov 2026, 10:47 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,580
Videos
≈69
Links
≈909
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 1 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
5m 08s
Average length
15s
Measured directly from 20 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
44,892 reactions across 810 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 14.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🎉
6,500
14.5%
🥰
6,469
14.4%
👍
6,332
14.1%
❤
6,314
14.1%
🔥
6,300
14.0%
😁
6,283
14.0%
👏
6,188
13.8%
🤩
136
0.303%
😍
127
0.283%
❤🔥
122
0.272%
💯
121
0.27%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 810 of the 823 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 44,892 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 823 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 31 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
SATURDAY MODE ☀️
Forex is taking a break, but we’re not.
ᅠᅠ ᅠᅠ ᅠᅠ ᅠᅠ ᅠᅠ ᅠᅠ
Crypto is still moving, so today I’ll be watching the market and taking a few good setups 📊
ᅠᅠ ᅠᅠ ᅠᅠ ᅠᅠ ᅠᅠ ᅠᅠ
No rush, no Monday pressure. Just good opportunities when they appear.
I can now eat the fruit of my labour because i worked for it, now my family shall know and remember my name as I'm going to do something significant for them with someᅠ ᅠᅠ ᅠᅠ ᅠᅠ ᅠ
Hello king, I'm here to give you my thanks, I did my big investment And truly it paid off, you're one of a kind, your type is rare, you're amongst those hoest men that comes in a million years on earth
WHILE OTHERS ARE JUST WAKING UP ☀️
We’re already preparing for the market 📊
ᅠᅠ ᅠᅠ ᅠᅠ ᅠᅠ ᅠᅠ ᅠᅠ
Checking charts. Building scenarios. Waiting for the right setups.
ᅠᅠ ᅠᅠ ᅠᅠ ᅠᅠ ᅠᅠ ᅠᅠ
Results come from discipline and consistency every single day.
Want to trade with me today?
Showing the 12 most recent of 823 posts we hold for @THEKINGOFFOREXxx. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“THE KING OF FOREX™” (@THEKINGOFFOREXxx), 29,853 subscribers as measured 31 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/THEKINGOFFOREXxx.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.