Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 杭州探花楼狼友出击报告区

Channel

杭州探花楼狼友出击报告区

@THbaogao1

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

8,003subscribers

+960 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002642201510
TypeChannel
Username@THbaogao1
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 September 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/THbaogao1

Growth

7,0368,0037,519.59 August 2026 — 7,043 subscribers9 August 2026 — 7,043 subscribers10 August 2026 — 7,036 subscribers12 August 2026 — 7,090 subscribers16 August 2026 — 7,181 subscribers19 August 2026 — 7,260 subscribers23 August 2026 — 7,401 subscribers26 August 2026 — 7,514 subscribers30 August 2026 — 7,721 subscribers1 September 2026 — 7,799 subscribers6 September 2026 — 8,003 subscribers9 August 20266 September 2026
11 measurements spanning 27 days, net +960. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,891–8,148 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Sept 2026, 03:018,003+204
1 Sept 2026, 16:057,799+78
30 Aug 2026, 01:397,721+207
26 Aug 2026, 19:087,514+113
23 Aug 2026, 13:427,401+141
19 Aug 2026, 17:337,260+79
16 Aug 2026, 15:527,181+91
12 Aug 2026, 21:157,090+54
10 Aug 2026, 07:067,036-7
9 Aug 2026, 21:007,043no change
9 Aug 2026, 20:487,043first reading

Engagement

88 posts held, back to 6 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
1.05%
avg views ÷ 8,003 subscribers
Avg views / post
83.9
71 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.172%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
71
of 88 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 71 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held88 (6 August 202628 August 2026)
Views total5,954
Reactions total1
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken28 Aug 2026, 22:13 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

4 reactions across 3 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
4100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 88 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 88 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 13:31 UTC49 viewsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Telegram必备的搜索引擎,极搜JISOU帮你精准找到,想要的群组、频道、视频、音乐 👉 t.me/jisou2?start=a_7636906302

28 Aug 2026, 13:31 UTC47 viewsread 28 August 2026

探花楼(杭州最真实的出击交流群) 【探花时间】:2026-08-28 【老师艺名】:佳琪 【探花留名】:HZ 【人照打分】:9 【身材打分】:9 【服务打分】:9 【态度打分】:9 【环境打分】:9 【综合评分】:9 【体验详细】:在探花楼抢了工兵,和老师约好时间,准时到达课室。开门见面,真的很惊艳,本人比照片好看。交好水费后,一起洗浴,老师洗的很认真,洗好后也有认真帮擦干。来到床上,老师直接开始大蟒蛇,很舒服,舌吻像女朋友一样。接着开始舔胸,老师技术很好,力度很大,花样很多,二弟直接起立。接着开始进攻二弟,简直了,老师不是简单的吞吐,有缠绕鬼头,有舔系带,还有上下吞吐,节奏由慢变快,太爽了。接着我来服务老师,奶子很软,老师还会呻吟。bb很嫩,后面老师有点受不了了。进入正题,硬邦邦的jb一下插到底,老师真是很紧,再加上大屁股,我不敢太过用力,担心被老师秒了。值得好评..

28 Aug 2026, 09:31 UTC56 viewsread 28 August 2026

探花楼(杭州最真实的出击交流群) 【探花时间】:2026-08-28 【老师艺名】:悠悠 【探花留名】:月下无限连 【人照打分】:8 【身材打分】:8 【服务打分】:9 【态度打分】:9 【环境打分】:9 【综合评分】:8.6 【体验详细】:跟老师约好时间听从老师指挥上楼,小区方便停车好找地方,一进门发现老师很有良家的感觉,情绪价值挺好的,给完老师水费后先在沙发聊聊天,然后洗澡,老师属于比较敏感的那种,稍微一碰就水多多,整体下来喘的也挺好听的,也没有做做,值得刷一遍

28 Aug 2026, 08:06 UTC57 viewsread 28 August 2026

探花楼(杭州最真实的出击交流群) 【探花时间】:2026-08-28 【老师艺名】:冰冰 【探花留名】:啊biu~pa 【人照打分】:8.5 【身材打分】:8.5 【服务打分】:8.5 【态度打分】:10 【环境打分】:9.9 【综合评分】:9.08 【体验详细】:在频道看到老师的拼团,就点了,到了地方,老师遥控上楼,对于服务系的老师来说,没必要过多描述,懂得都懂。老师也挺会聊天的,不会尴尬,情绪价值也高。是值得一去的。

28 Aug 2026, 08:05 UTC43 viewsread 28 August 2026

探花楼(杭州最真实的出击交流群) 【探花时间】:2026-08-28 【老师艺名】:雪宝 【探花留名】:11123 【人照打分】:9 【身材打分】:9 【服务打分】:9 【态度打分】:9 【环境打分】:8 【综合评分】:8.8 【体验详细】:一段时间没cj了,群里看见老师工兵,感觉还不错,拍下约时间,等了一整天老师终于回复了,立马确定时间驱车前往,刚好赶上晚高峰,堵麻了,忐忑的心情到目的地,跟随指示上楼,看到老师后只能说没白堵,人照几乎一致,交水费脱衣服洗漱,老师刚开没多久,i 的不行,我也是i人,扯了些话题,一打开话匣子老师也挺能唠的,自然而然进入正题,一阵翻云覆雨,正面跟后入都很舒服(就是一动起来床的声音咯吱咯吱很响)老师全程配合,女友感拉满,结束后也不着急赶,排课比较宽松,愉快结束出击,一定会二刷!

28 Aug 2026, 08:05 UTC37 viewsread 28 August 2026

探花楼(杭州最真实的出击交流群) 【探花时间】:2026-08-28 【老师艺名】:萱萱 【探花留名】:你很嚣张 【人照打分】:8 【身材打分】:8 【服务打分】:7 【态度打分】:8 【环境打分】:9 【综合评分】:8 【体验详细】:昨天中午看老师有回复,频道还发是头课,想想中午也有点空档,就约了老师。老师如约而至,初见老师,一件浅色短袖+牛仔短裤,邻家感拉满。带老师上门,和老师一起洗洗,洗澡就是帮忙洗一下。然后回房间,这会儿可以好好看看老师,原以为是个半御姐形象,真人就是个小软妹,软软糯糯的,甚是可爱。 身材也是那种软糯感拉满,有点肉嘟嘟却完全不胖,这个胸的确如狼友所说很好rua,大家可以好好rua一rua。服务就是舔吹做,口活在嫩妹里算还行。后面先女上再传教士完成第一发。休息十几二十分钟,开始第二发,细节不表,成功出货,为妹妹正个名,吊感尚可,没有之前有篇报告说的松,不然我第二发不会那么轻易出货。

28 Aug 2026, 08:05 UTC33 viewsread 28 August 2026

探花楼(杭州最真实的出击交流群) 【探花时间】:2026-08-28 【老师艺名】:奇不琦 【探花留名】:一程 【人照打分】:9 【身材打分】:8 【服务打分】:7 【态度打分】:10 【环境打分】:7 【综合评分】:8.2 【体验详细】:老师新开,并且好像不是纯自聊的,所以找位置费了点功夫,不过还是顺利找到课室,老师标准嫩妹水平,20岁上下,颜值优秀,皮肤状态有点小瑕疵,但瑕不掩瑜,整体还是很顶的,由于是嫩妹不苛求服务,交好课费直接上床,小狼自带了情趣丝袜也是让老师换上后开始享受,先是舌吻,老师吻技一般但是非常配合,会时不时轻哼娇喘,随后小狼用舌头探索老师身体,各个地方都很敏感,发出的娇哼相当刺激,妹妹三点粉嫩,下面多汁微甜无异味,在让老师轻哼求饶加上溪水潺潺后,小狼开始带套上阵,bb里紧致温暖,随着抽查会不自觉痉挛夹紧,非常舒适,今天状态奇佳,在鏖战半小时后也是顺利出货,过程中老师不催不事,总的来说是非常嫩的待开发老师,强

28 Aug 2026, 08:05 UTC33 viewsread 28 August 2026

探花楼(杭州最真实的出击交流群) 【探花时间】:2026-08-28 【老师艺名】:佳琪 【探花留名】:playmaker 【人照打分】:9 【身材打分】:9 【服务打分】:8 【态度打分】:10 【环境打分】:7 【综合评分】:8.6 【体验详细】:见到佳琪后发现本人比照片还要好看,脸圆圆的非常可爱,身材是有点丰满的,但是不胖,胸软软的,一只手难以掌握。在洗的过程中也是不需要自己动手,享受佳琪的搓洗,感觉非常的舒服。擦干后转战床上,佳琪老师直接吻了上来,属于是大蟒蛇了,虽然服务比较简单,但是做的也非常认真,口的时候也非常舒服,第一次选择佳琪女上的姿势,享受着强大的视觉冲击发射了。简单冲洗过后,休息的时间也是和佳琪老师紧紧抱着,一边亲着,手也在佳琪身上游走,让我很快就有了感觉。第二次先选择了经典姿势,中途也是和佳琪边亲边做,接下来切换到后入,看着臀浪,感受着下面的湿润,渐渐来了感觉,完成释放。总体来说是体验很好的一次出击,老师

28 Aug 2026, 08:05 UTC34 viewsread 28 August 2026

探花楼(杭州最真实的出击交流群) 【探花时间】:2026-08-27 【老师艺名】:珊珊 【探花留名】:黄泉 【人照打分】:9 【身材打分】:8 【服务打分】:10 【态度打分】:10 【环境打分】:10 【综合评分】:9.4 【体验详细】:洗浴全自动,水中萧,洗完老师先让挑选情趣内衣,挑了个包臀裙开始服务,老师口活很好,胸大且软,一点一点从上面舔到下, 接着就是女上,前女上后女上,然后老汉推车,后入,干了一次老师给做前列腺保养放松,起立以后又做一遍,狠狠身进老师逼里(有套)。和老师聊天很舒服,做完还有按摩环节,按完整个人都轻松好多,强烈推荐

28 Aug 2026, 08:05 UTC32 viewsread 28 August 2026

探花楼(杭州最真实的出击交流群) 【探花时间】:2026-08-27 【老师艺名】:你的后妈 【探花留名】:hhggg 【人照打分】:9 【身材打分】:9 【服务打分】:9 【态度打分】:9 【环境打分】:9 【综合评分】:9 【体验详细】:进门后见到本人还是有点丰满的,穿着紧身裙,没有穿内衣内裤,然后给我放水准备洗澡,我从后面抱着她摸着咪咪,她转头跟我舌吻,感觉还是很爽的。等洗完澡,骚妈给我擦拭身体,然后蹲下来给我口,别说骚妈这个口活是非常好,差点给我整出来了。口完带我进房间,躺着按了会之后继续口活服务,舔咪咪,360度转着口,说实话感觉非常棒。然后开始给我带套子,我简单舔舐了下她的馒头比,口感适中,颜色略黑。之后就开始正活了,先趴在她的身上边舌吻变抽查,随即换到她的落地镜子面前老汉推车,中途把她头转过来舌吻,后来又换了女上,抱着她边舌吻边干,然后就是女上背对着我全自动。最后又换成了老汉推车舌吻中结束。总结骚妈确实舌头非常灵

28 Aug 2026, 08:05 UTC40 viewsread 28 August 2026

探花楼(杭州最真实的出击交流群) 【探花时间】:2026-08-27 【老师艺名】:小兔兔 【探花留名】:老牛吃嫩草 【人照打分】:7 【身材打分】:3 【服务打分】:1 【态度打分】:3 【环境打分】:6 【综合评分】:4 【体验详细】:玩TG一年半第二个差评,我对东站盈澜公寓的中介一直都很满意的这是第一次失望,进门身高163左右颜值p的有七分相似,没露胸穿的挺翘的是胸罩我大意了,她说洗过了我又大意了下次必须脱衣服看到身材再交课费 自己洗没一次性浴巾公用的棉毛巾我都用卫生纸擦的,到卧室才看到身材黑瘦对A➕一点,右小腿纹身,上嘴亲说没有,我说那你看课表勉强答应了亲有烟味,毛有一指长小馒头,我不舔的就试探一下不认说没有,我又确认下课表还是不认,就亲了十几秒让退四百说不给退,不退那就勉强来吧,也说没有口,直接带套,油性套套抹了润滑油才插进去,,太瘦了顶起来膈应想后入腰供着失败,换传教式涂了两次润滑液才出货 避坑纯快餐,妹子都不知道

28 Aug 2026, 05:47 UTC66 viewsread 28 August 2026

探花楼(杭州最真实的出击交流群) 【探花时间】:2026-08-28 【老师艺名】:甜甜 【探花留名】:Godsix 【人照打分】:8 【身材打分】:8 【服务打分】:9.5 【态度打分】:10 【环境打分】:8 【综合评分】:8.7 【体验详细】:小狼昨天下午闲着没事,刷老师简历玩。突然看到狼友们的95报告,兴致大起。一番寻找后,甜甜老师的照片映入眼帘,这脸庞也太欲了吧!果断联系老师,刚好老师有空,立马cj! 到楼下,一番遥控指挥上楼。老师警惕性很高,而我更高,走了三层楼下来。一进门就看到老师的脸,甚至比照片还欲三分。老师个子不算高,但是屁股上的肉却是很丰满,是我爱的类型。话不多说,脱衣洗澡,老师有帮擦干~上床躺着~ 上床后,b面开始,水平85分以上妥妥的。但是!老师的吸力太强了!!!我愿称之为拔火罐😍😍😍这些年也见过了三位数以上的老师,甜甜老师的吸力,可以进前三!!! b面当中老师的独龙又温润,又坚决,超级好评!独龙的同时

Showing the 12 most recent of 88 posts we hold for @THbaogao1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“杭州探花楼狼友出击报告区” (@THbaogao1), 8,003 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/THbaogao1.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.