Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 泰隆 - TaiLung

Channel

泰隆 - TaiLung

@TN7fml

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

137subscribers

-5 since we began measuring on 15 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003842457566
TypeChannel
Username@TN7fml
Created26 April 2026measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded15 August 2026
Last confirmed live24 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 24 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/TN7fml

Growth

137142139.515 August 2026 — 142 subscribers15 August 2026 — 142 subscribers24 August 2026 — 137 subscribers15 August 202624 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 10 days, net -5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 136–143 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
24 Aug 2026, 23:52137-5
15 Aug 2026, 08:15142no change
15 Aug 2026, 08:02142first reading

Engagement

7 posts held, back to 26 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
48.2%
avg views ÷ 137 subscribers
Avg views / post
66.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
1
of 7 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026
Posts held7 (26 April 20263 August 2026)
Views total66
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Aug 2026, 08:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

53 reactions across 3 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 11.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 5397838906756462546611.3%
custom 5397862112464759415611.3%
custom 539563460498610392759.43%
custom 541138577047896584759.43%
custom 526052828261230635547.55%
custom 534171730353904569047.55%
custom 539569065430931779447.55%
custom 546536910275322999747.55%
custom 534810202582759801535.66%
custom 520194139393677669423.77%
custom 532347357954575003723.77%
custom 534834304221238136523.77%
custom 538904544225423510723.77%
custom 539540374190401056123.77%
custom 524899727038011491511.89%
custom 542465536399773160911.89%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 53reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 26 April 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Aug 2026, 15:00 UTC66 viewsread 15 August 2026
Forwarded from @GGZ1ONEPhoto

Loto ot GG Zone Prize: 💝 10x ☁️Условия: 1. Подписка на данный канал 2. Репост 50+ 3. Ставить рк тут

22 Jun 2026, 10:29 UTC520 views17 reactionsread 15 August 2026

кзкф онли 4-5 поколение и дорам персы если не будете подчиняться правилам заявки отменяются

custom 53417173035390456904custom 53978389067564625463custom 53954037419040105612custom 53956346049861039272custom 53956906543093177942custom 53978621124647594152custom 54113857704789658472

22 Jun 2026, 10:29 UTC507 views17 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

心连心 🌟 只有 😀🔠hat 🙂 🔤nfo 😀😀🔤nitial 🤩 🔠o2st 😊 www. TikTok 宝贝,你真漂亮!

custom 52605282826123063554custom 53956346049861039273custom 53978389067564625463custom 54113857704789658473custom 53956906543093177942custom 53978621124647594152

26 Apr 2026, 12:58 UTC≈1,440 views19 reactionsread 15 August 2026

🌟✖️✖️TaiLung Patent 🏃‍♂️ 🔤s of today the "Tailung, 909, TN7 " name is entirely ours. I'd also like to point out that if we see similar copies of our design, we'll be forced to ask you to change or modify it. Of course, the design and everything else is ours. ✔️ Pnt Date: 26.04.26

custom 54653691027532299974custom 53481020258275980153custom 52019413939367766942custom 53234735795457500372custom 53483430422123813652custom 53890454422542351072custom 53978621124647594152custom 52489972703801149151

Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @TN7fml. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 862,252 of 1,628,524entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“泰隆 - TaiLung” (@TN7fml), 137 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TN7fml.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.