Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for TON: Gaia

Channel

TON: Gaia

@TONgaia

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

26,426subscribers

-1,710 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001517640570
TypeChannel
Username@TONgaia
Created6 May 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held34
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/TONgaia

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 68% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

26,42628,13627,2816 August 2026 — 28,136 subscribers6 August 2026 — 28,136 subscribers7 August 2026 — 28,084 subscribers8 August 2026 — 28,060 subscribers9 August 2026 — 28,027 subscribers10 August 2026 — 27,998 subscribers11 August 2026 — 27,978 subscribers12 August 2026 — 27,915 subscribers13 August 2026 — 27,870 subscribers14 August 2026 — 27,827 subscribers16 August 2026 — 27,768 subscribers17 August 2026 — 27,721 subscribers18 August 2026 — 27,691 subscribers19 August 2026 — 27,650 subscribers20 August 2026 — 27,619 subscribers22 August 2026 — 27,570 subscribers23 August 2026 — 27,512 subscribers24 August 2026 — 27,446 subscribers25 August 2026 — 27,432 subscribers27 August 2026 — 27,394 subscribers27 August 2026 — 27,379 subscribers28 August 2026 — 27,340 subscribers29 August 2026 — 27,327 subscribers30 August 2026 — 27,289 subscribers31 August 2026 — 27,225 subscribers2 September 2026 — 27,114 subscribers3 September 2026 — 27,056 subscribers4 September 2026 — 27,009 subscribers7 September 2026 — 26,853 subscribers10 September 2026 — 26,708 subscribers12 September 2026 — 26,634 subscribers14 September 2026 — 26,557 subscribers16 September 2026 — 26,495 subscribers18 September 2026 — 26,426 subscribers6 August 202618 September 2026
34 measurements spanning 44 days, net -1,710. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 26,170–28,393 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 21:5826,426-69
16 Sept 2026, 11:3626,495-62
14 Sept 2026, 12:3626,557-77
12 Sept 2026, 20:1526,634-74
10 Sept 2026, 23:1726,708-145
7 Sept 2026, 21:4126,853-156
4 Sept 2026, 17:3727,009-47
3 Sept 2026, 05:5527,056-58
2 Sept 2026, 01:0427,114-111
31 Aug 2026, 21:3527,225-64
30 Aug 2026, 19:0227,289-38
29 Aug 2026, 21:5427,327-13
28 Aug 2026, 22:1427,340-39
27 Aug 2026, 22:4527,379-15
27 Aug 2026, 00:3327,394-38
25 Aug 2026, 21:1427,432-14
24 Aug 2026, 23:5827,446-66
23 Aug 2026, 13:0227,512-58
22 Aug 2026, 00:2327,570-49
20 Aug 2026, 17:3827,619first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 26 May 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 58 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 July 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 41s
Average length
1m 41s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,096 reactions across 20 posts, in 31 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
30427.7%
👍21419.5%
😁464.20%
🎉444.01%
💯444.01%
👏423.83%
🤩423.83%
🔥413.74%
🍾383.47%
👎373.38%
😍333.01%
😢272.46%
❤‍🔥242.19%
😱222.01%
🤗222.01%
😭181.64%
🐳161.46%
100.912%
👀100.912%
🤔100.912%
11 further kinds524.74%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,096 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 May 2025 to 7 July 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Jul 2025, 01:56 UTC≈21,500 views153 reactionsread 3 September 2026

​​Aprender sobre blockchain ya no es solo para expertos. En @TONGaia creemos que todos podemos entender cómo funciona el ecosistema de TON y encontrar nuevas oportunidades en este mundo digital, sin necesidad de saberlo todo desde el inicio. Aquí compartimos lo que vamos aprendiendo, resolvemos dudas entre todos y crecemos juntos, paso a paso. Si te da curiosidad este mundo, pero no sabes por dónde empezar, aquí ha

38👍20👎14😍13👏12🤗12🎉11🤩11

6 Jul 2025, 00:04 UTC≈20,200 views125 reactionsread 3 September 2026

👀👀 ¿Sabías que muchas de las herramientas clave de TON, están manejadas por una sola empresa? The Open Platform (TOP) es la empresa detrás de servicios como: @wallet, Tonkeeper, Ston.fi, Getgems y acaba de cerrar una inversión de 28,5 millones de dólares, convirtiéndose en la primera empresa valorada en 1.000 millones de dólares en TON. Con ese dinero planean expandir sus servicios, lanzar juegos Web3 e integrar

21😁16👍14🔥11🤩11🎉10🐳9😢9

2 Jul 2025, 00:22 UTC≈18,300 views93 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

🚫 Estafas en TON: DUSTING (Airdrops falsos). ¿Te apareció un token raro en tu wallet de con un valor que parece alto? Tipo $150 o $300... Spoiler: no te ganaste nada. Es una trampa y funciona así: ▶️Alguien te manda un token que no conoces. ▶️Parece tener valor, pero ese precio es falso. ▶️Si intentas venderlo o haces clic en un enlace para “retirar” o “reclamar”, te llevan a una miniapp o bot falso. ▶️Te hacen fi

26👍14😭12😢9😁8🔥7😍5🤗4

30 Jun 2025, 02:25 UTC≈16,400 views90 reactionsread 3 September 2026

👀👀 🦔 ¿Sabías que las miniapps de TON y Telegram podrían convertir tu chat en tu nuevo “sistema operativo”? Sin instalar nada, todo lo que necesitas, pagos, juegos, compras, funciona dentro de tu conversación. Es la forma más sencilla y rápida de usar blockchain, sin complicaciones. Así, Telegram podría deja de ser solo para mensajes y volverse tu lugar para hacer todo. 🤓

👍23❤‍🔥1413💔8💯8🍾6🤔6😭4

30 Jun 2025, 02:24 UTC≈10,300 views58 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @PlanetaTONVideo

🔒 ¿Por qué TON es tan importante para el futuro? 🔔#vídeo

👍1716🔥7👎6👏6💯3🎉1💔1

29 Jun 2025, 02:17 UTC≈10,100 views48 reactionsread 3 September 2026

🧑‍💻 ¿TON está buscando atraer desarrolladores antes que usuarios? Todo indica que sí. En los últimos meses, el foco de TON no ha estado en lanzar productos virales ni en captar millones de usuarios rápidamente. 👩‍💻 Más bien, se han concentrado en algo muy específico: crear un entorno atractivo para desarrolladores. Estamos viendo integraciones con otras blockchains, kits de desarrollo, hackathons con muy buenos pre

16👍108🍾5😱4👨‍💻2🤩2👀1

27 Jun 2025, 01:39 UTC≈9,920 views45 reactionsread 3 September 2026

🅰️Viendo los resultados de la encuesta, el 66% seleccionó que no conocía Pengu Clash, así que aquí va un resumen: Es un juego nuevo de Pudgy Penguins que se puede jugar directamente desde Telegram. La idea es formar tu equipo de pingüinos y competir en minijuegos como fútbol, curling, dardos y bomber, todo en tiempo real contra otros jugadores. Lo bueno es que no necesitas NFTs ni saber de cripto. Es gratuito, acc

16👍13😁5🥰4🎉3💯2🤬2

22 Jun 2025, 03:26 UTC≈10,800 views53 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Poll

¿Ya estás jugando Pengu Clash?

  1. Sí, me parece adictivo. 😍19%
  2. Sí, pero me aburre. 🏃‍♂️6%
  3. No, no me inscribí en la whitelist. 😀11%
  4. No conozco Pengu Clash. 🤣64%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

24👍15🎉9🌚1👀1👎1💯1🤗1

21 Jun 2025, 01:49 UTC≈10,200 views46 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

⚙️⚙️ Los números anónimos en Fragment.com no paran de subir. Desde nuestra última actualización en @TONgaia, pasaron de 480 TON (1.401 USD) a 859 TON (2.507 USD). Como hemos visto, no importa el precio que tenga TON, la demanda no baja, y cada nuevo precio rompe el anterior sin mucho esfuerzo. 🔍 ¿Es pura especulación o de verdad estamos subestimando su valor a largo plazo?

15👍11🐳6👏6👎5🤩2😱1

20 Jun 2025, 03:15 UTC≈8,490 views30 reactionsread 3 September 2026

🦔 Caso de uso: Comprar un protocolo entero con un solo NFT. ¿Qué pasa cuando un protocolo DeFi no muere, sino que se vende como un solo NFT? Eso es lo que está haciendo Aqua Protocol, un proyecto basado en TON que permitía emitir un stablecoin colateralizado (AquaUSD). El equipo hace poco anunció el cierre de operaciones, pero en lugar de simplemente desconectarlo, empaquetaron todo el protocolo en un NFT y lo está

13👍7❤‍🔥3👀2💯2🐳1😁1😍1

16 Jun 2025, 01:40 UTC≈5,380 views70 reactionsread 3 September 2026

👀👀 🦔 ¿Sabías que muy pronto podrás usar Bitcoin real, pero basado en TON? TON está integrando tgBTC, una versión tokenizada de BTC, totalmente respaldada 1:1, que te permitirá enviar, intercambiar y usar Bitcoin dentro del ecosistema TON: billeteras, juegos, DeFi, y mucho más. Será una vía rápida para mover BTC… directamente desde tu app de Telegram. 🤝 El despliegue de este token está en marcha y promete transfo

20👏8💯8👍7🍾5🎉5🕊4🤔4

14 Jun 2025, 02:44 UTC≈5,300 views42 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Poll

¿Qué te genera más curiosidad sobre XAUt0 (oro digital en TON)?

  1. ¿Cómo se respalda con oro real? 🪙44%
  2. ¿Cómo se puede usar dentro de TON? 📄22%
  3. ¿Para qué sirve tener oro en blockchain? 🤝14%
  4. Todo suena interesante, pero sigo confundido/a. 🤔20%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

11😁9🔥6👏5🤗5😢4😭2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @TONgaia. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

22 Jun 2025, 03:26 UTCAnonymous Poll109 voters

¿Ya estás jugando Pengu Clash?

  1. Sí, me parece adictivo. 😍19%
  2. Sí, pero me aburre. 🏃‍♂️6%
  3. No, no me inscribí en la whitelist. 😀11%
  4. No conozco Pengu Clash. 🤣64%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

14 Jun 2025, 02:44 UTCAnonymous Poll91 voters

¿Qué te genera más curiosidad sobre XAUt0 (oro digital en TON)?

  1. ¿Cómo se respalda con oro real? 🪙44%
  2. ¿Cómo se puede usar dentro de TON? 📄22%
  3. ¿Para qué sirve tener oro en blockchain? 🤝14%
  4. Todo suena interesante, pero sigo confundido/a. 🤔20%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

2 Jun 2025, 02:24 UTCAnonymous Poll103 voters

¿Alguna vez has vendido un Telegram Gift en Getgems u otro lado?

  1. Sí. ¡Fue muy fácil! 🪙10%
  2. No, pero quiero probar 💼27%
  3. Los guardaré hasta que tengan más valor 🆙5%
  4. No sabía que se podían vender 🌘14%
  5. No sé qué son los regalos de Telegram.45%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 May 2025 to 7 July 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Gram 🇪🇸
@toncoin_es · 200,209
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 11 August 2026
Cripto Escena🇪🇸
@CriptoEscena · 90,574
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 27 August 2026
Billonario
@ibillonario · 52,456
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 24 August 2026
Telo News Español - Cripto | DeFi | Web3
@telonews_es · 70,465
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 20 August 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“TON: Gaia” (@TONgaia), 26,426 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TONgaia.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.