Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
13 measurements spanning 39 days, net -45. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,758–2,817 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
13 Sept 2026, 23:37
2,765
-3
10 Sept 2026, 00:16
2,768
-6
4 Sept 2026, 22:00
2,774
-10
31 Aug 2026, 19:46
2,784
-5
28 Aug 2026, 11:05
2,789
-3
25 Aug 2026, 03:35
2,792
-3
18 Aug 2026, 20:47
2,795
-2
16 Aug 2026, 03:26
2,797
-6
12 Aug 2026, 17:18
2,803
-1
10 Aug 2026, 03:20
2,804
-5
7 Aug 2026, 04:18
2,809
-1
6 Aug 2026, 11:04
2,810
no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:57
2,810
first reading
Engagement
14 posts held, back to 15 July 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1m 08s
Average length
1m 08s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,719 reactions across 14 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
😁
975
56.7%
💯
389
22.6%
🤬
105
6.11%
🤯
100
5.82%
😱
36
2.09%
😢
27
1.57%
❤
24
1.40%
🤔
24
1.40%
👏
17
0.989%
🔥
15
0.873%
🎉
2
0.116%
🙏
2
0.116%
🥰
2
0.116%
❤🔥
1
0.058%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,719 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2024 to 31 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
✡️ Epstein promoted TRS to Noam Chomsky ✡️
>Mike Enoch is already running damage control
>”It’s all fake, goyim!”
Imagine being a TRS paypig funding Epstein’s jewish machinations lmao.
Also explains the TRS dox blackmail scheme similar to Epstein’s pedo blackmail scheme.
Reminder, paypig dox were traded multiple times already.
Pretty obvious why they still have a payment processor.
https://www.justice.gov/epst…
💰Jesse "Sven" Dunstan, owner of TRS and keeper of vetting & supporter info threatens to dox/reveal identity of people who don't pay him💰:
>Sven is annoyed that people are complaining the TRS paywall model limits the message spreading
>Sven believes it is the paying subscribers who need to do the marketing for TRS
>Sven threatens he will use the dox/info he has about people to get back at them if they don't pay
>S…
Useless rubes who will risk life, limb and personal liberty in revolutionary action…based around a con artist who lies to them all the time
So Mike Enoch and the NJP basically
What did they do with NJP donation fund when they folded?
@tasown2
Demoralization and impotent despair in the TRS forums
The natural result of listening to years of mike enoch's brain rotting "hot takes"
(There were 14 up votes on his post, how fitting)
@tasown2
Megalomania + Paranoid Schizophrenia + alcoholism + cocaine
If Striker/TRS are such a threat to ZOG that the jews trained Fuentes from high school to infiltrate and sabotage their popularity…
How come Striker/TRS still have credit card processing?
So jews are willing to spend years and millions of dollars to train up Striker/TRS rivals but they are just fine with a “nazi” like Striker getting $500 superchats?
On …
🤡 The Absolute State of TRS 🤡
1. Mike Enoch: All these people (Syrian opposition) will be wiped out!
❌WRONG
2. Louis of NIGR: Homs will not fall, it wont even be threatened!
❌WRONG : Homs fell
3. Enoch: They (opposition) are not going to get to Damascus!
❌WRONG: they did
4. Enoch: Russia is the toughest army in the world right now! The Syrian opposition stands no chance!
❌WRONG: Assad gone
5. Enoch (02:01) : The…
>7-figures in donations to their LLCs
>hundreds of unpaid volunteers
>thousands of WN identities sacrificed/sold
>10+ years wasted
And all we got in the end is a podcast with two libtard redditors
Mike Enoch might be the greatest long con jew in modern history.
@TRSEXPOSED
>NJP/TRS donor list gets leaked
>certain LLC owner mysteriously gets access to credit card processing for their “nazi” podcast network days after NJP implodes
It’s a form of pump and dump scheme.
You draw all the info, time, and money of pro-White people into an LLC, use it and leak (sell) it to fund your lifestyle and you repeat again when your new list of paypigs dumb enough to use their credit card ripens.
🔥🐖🔥…
The anatomy of TRS Twitter/X echo chamber
>Striker reposts a video claiming to be Tel Aviv Civilian building being hit today
>It's actually Moscow being attacked by a Ukrainian drone in 2023 (ironic lmao)
>Boresoy uses a screencap of the fake video to dunk (?) on a micro-niche group they have an extremely online beef with
Even when the truth is good enough (there's plenty of REAL footages of the missiles hitting …
😁80💯12❤3🤔1🤯1
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @TRSEXPOSED. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
2
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
2
vacant every time we have ever looked
@TRSEXPOSED named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@buttafuocoschannel named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@freechad5 named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“TRS EXPOSED” (@TRSEXPOSED), 2,765 subscribers as measured 13 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TRSEXPOSED.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.