Channel
@TT08906
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
22subscribers
+13 since we began measuring on 11 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003870164867 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @TT08906 |
| Created | 10 September 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 13 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| On Telegram | t.me/TT08906 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Sept 2026, 04:22 | 22 | no change |
| 12 Sept 2026, 19:38 | 22 | +13 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 10:47 | 9 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 10 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 11 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 14 (10 September 2026 – 12 September 2026) |
| Views total | 2,940 |
| Reactions total | 1 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Sept 2026, 04:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 10 September 2026 to 12 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
【时间】：2026-09-12 【老师】：婷婷 【留名】：n Jaylinn 【费用】：工兵P 【评价】：👍 好评 【人照】：8 【颜值】：8 【身材】：8 【服务】：9 【态度】：10 【环境】：8 【综合】：8.5 【过程】：约好遥控上楼，整体很顺利，进门第一眼就被惊艳到了，真人比照片和视频上好看，是个很灵动的女孩，交水费洗澡然后开始服务，老师脱光陪洗，身材巨好，没有一丝的赘肉。由于老师洗过，只是简单的帮我冲洗一下，躺床上开始口，口活属于中规中矩没有齿感，不会让你半路缴械。 一柱擎天之后，老师就安排女上，双手顺势攀上双峰揉捏起妹子的小葡萄，不得不说胸型饱满圆润，揉捏起来像棉花一样软乎，不过没法太用力，老师会痛，不大尽兴。试了女上，传教士，后入各种姿势老师也非常的配合，叫声听着都能让你想发射，最后在后入中释放
💗婷婷宝贝😘初次下海，嫩妹（保真）活泼开朗，🉑纯🉑甜，女友体验哦😘三点粉嫩，可上门，💦联系：@TT80095
杭州探花楼，最真实的玩家交流群。 https://telegram.me/hz5hz
杭州狼友出击协会模板 https://t.me/+yI0wXTr_cK8wMTA1 【综合评价】： #好评 【验证留名】：陆伯言 【验证时间】：9月11日 【妹子花名】：婷婷 【联系方式】：@TT80095 【所在位置】：客运中心站附近 【修车水费】：工兵p 【包含服务】：有的打✅ ① 舌吻 ✅ ② 69舔逼 ✅ ③ 情绪价值 ✅ ④ 毒龙 【身高身材】：163左右 百斤左右 无纹身 黄皮 手感可以 【颜值相似】：人照8分 还可以的 【凶器罩杯】：b罩杯 乳头大小 【服务总结】：服务是到位，无少做，过程无机车 【个人卫生】：抽烟，有漱口水 浴巾，事前事后有清洗 【时间管理】：开课准时，排课宽松，课时做完 【推荐程度】：8分 【流程小文】： #上课流程 竞拍看到的，看频道是初次下海，看照片也是我喜欢的类型，于是就拍下了。马上和老师约好时间，便准时赴约，地点是在客运中心附近的小区…
https://t.me/SHdajuyuan
我在杭州日报上榜了~ 【日报主群】@hangzhouribao9 【日报榜单】 @hangzhouribao999 【工兵专区】@ribao_shixi 【视频福利】 @hzrbfls https://t.me/hz_news9
💗婷婷宝贝😘初次下海，嫩妹（保真）活泼开朗，🉑纯🉑甜，女友体验哦😘三点粉嫩，可上门，💦联系：@TT80095
开课了
https://t.me/chasehz_jlq
我在杭州御女阁免费上榜啦，群内氛围轻松，不强制做活动，永久上榜！ 👑👑认准Telegram官方认证防伪标志 👑 超多好看的小姐姐都在这里上榜！💖💖💖 https://t.me/hangzhou_777
❤1
婷婷 pinned a photo
Photo, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @TT08906. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“婷婷” (@TT08906), 22 subscribers as measured 13 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TT08906.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.