Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for TWL

Channel

TWL

@TWL_34

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

15subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 15 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004297396797
TypeChannel
Username@TWL_34
DescriptionMeet my flock. I keep them well-fed, well-groomed. each day I read out loud to them: mysteries, whodunnits. I like to pretend that they follow along, but they're only sheep. He, him/ 24 https://t.me/HarfChatBot?start=132de0aa1511
CreatedBetween 1 May 2026 and 31 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded15 September 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/TWL_34

Growth

1515 Sept 2026, 11:47 — 15 subscribers15 Sept 2026, 12:22 — 15 subscribers15 Sept 2026, 11:4715 Sept 2026, 12:22
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14–16 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Sept 2026, 12:2215no change
15 Sept 2026, 11:4715first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 11 September 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
96.7%
avg views ÷ 15 subscribers
Avg views / post
14.5
16 posts measured
Reaction rate
14.2%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
16
of 16 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 12 of 16 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 September 2026
Posts held16 (11 September 202614 September 2026)
Views total232
Reactions total24
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Sept 2026, 12:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
52
Videos
6
Links
9

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

24 reactions across 12 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1354.2%
🤣520.8%
❤‍🔥28.33%
🔥28.33%
😭28.33%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 24 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 11 September 2026 to 14 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

14 Sept 2026, 15:20 UTC10 views1 reactionsread 15 September 2026

یکی از لذت‌های دنیای برام اینه که فیلم و سریال رو کیفیت 1080 یا 4k دانلود کنم و بشینم ببینم. روحم جلا داده میشه.

1

Signed 𝟖𝟓𝟗𝟐𝟕𝟓-🄴

14 Sept 2026, 15:13 UTC10 views1 reactionsread 15 September 2026

امروز امتحان ترم زبان دارم و حتی یه کلمه هم نخوندم. به این میگن ریسک دنیای نرد‌ها. کارای هیجانی ریسکی‌مون اینجوریاس.🤙🏼🤙🏼🤙🏼

🔥1

Signed 𝟖𝟓𝟗𝟐𝟕𝟓-🄴

14 Sept 2026, 15:12 UTC10 views2 reactionsread 15 September 2026

در راستای فیلم بالا، کلا فرقه‌ها و دین‌ها و چنین چیزایی خیلی برام چیز جالبیه. مثلا یادمه رفته بودیم اصفهان و کلیسای وانک رو دیدیم، اول اینکه ششصد و نود ساعت اونجا موندم. اطراف رو که نگاه کردم، متوجه شدم یه خانومی با دید "pathetic losers" به بازدیدکننده‌ها نگاه‌ میندازه و همه رو جاج میکنه. فهمیدم خودش مسیحیه و یکی از این مسئولین کلیساست. همینجوری یسری سوال پرسیدم و طرف با بی‌حوصلگی بهم جواب میداد که یهو گفت "موقع مر

1😭1

Signed 𝟖𝟓𝟗𝟐𝟕𝟓-🄴

14 Sept 2026, 15:12 UTC10 views1 reactionsread 15 September 2026
Photo

●| Midsommer 2019 + چنتا‌ جوون آمریکایی میرن سوئد و توی یکی از جشن‌ها و فرقه‌های باستانی‌شون شرکت میکنن. حالا داستان این مراسمه چیه؟ اینکه اسیب زدن و کشتن انسان‌ها توش عادیه اما خیلی sugarcoatشده این اتفاق میفته. + مادرم فلورنس پیو توش بازی میکنه و صادقانه بازیش رو خیلی دوست داشتم توی این فیلم. + بیشتر از ۴ ساله که این فیلم توی واچ‌لیستمه و وقتی تموم شد اینطوری شدم که "این شاهکار رو چرا زودتر ندیدم؟" قطعا خشونت دا

1

Signed 𝟖𝟓𝟗𝟐𝟕𝟓-🄴

13 Sept 2026, 23:07 UTC13 views4 reactionsread 15 September 2026
Photo

امروز یه دوست جدید پیدا کردم. داشتم اب میخوردم که یهو زارت افتاد توی ظرف آبم. اَکه‌هی گویان بودم که متوجه شدم هنوز زنده‌اس و به سختی داره شنا میکنه. این وضعیت رو که دیدم، نجاتش دادم. اول یکم بی‌حرکت موند و من فقط به این فکر کردم که "به هر حال هیچکی نمیتونه از مرگ فرار کنه. از آب نجات پیدا میکنی و توی خشکی میمیری. Rest in peace." همون لحظه کم کم تکون خورد و جون گرفت. دستاشو بهم مالید و به کله‌اش میزد. حدود ۲۰ دقیقه

4

Signed 𝟖𝟓𝟗𝟐𝟕𝟓-🄴

12 Sept 2026, 18:58 UTC13 viewsread 15 September 2026

توی یه چنل مخصوص این کهن کاپل گی عضو شدم، خاطراتم اومد بالا اصن.

Signed 𝟖𝟓𝟗𝟐𝟕𝟓-🄴

12 Sept 2026, 18:57 UTC13 views1 reactionsread 15 September 2026
Forwarded from @bookendsofthesamesoulPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

😭1

Signed 𝟖𝟓𝟗𝟐𝟕𝟓-🄴

12 Sept 2026, 18:56 UTC15 views1 reactionsread 15 September 2026

چارلز و اریک یکی از اون کهن کاپل‌های گیه که مخصوص ما پیرپاتالایی که بین ۷۸ تا ۸۳ به دنیا اومدیم، ساخته شده‌. "مردان ایکس" چیزی بود که بخصوص وقتی بچه بودیم، خیلی زیاد میدیدیم و خیلی توی تلویزیون پخش میشد. بزرگتر شدیم و X-men: first class توی سال ۲۰۱۱ اومد. مایکل فسبندر و جیمز مک‌اوی نقش چارلز و اریک رو داشتن و کمیستری بینشون از اونایی بود که اون زمان حتی اگه نمیدونستی LGBT وجود داره هم، میگفتی "این دو تا احیانا با ه

🔥1

Signed 𝟖𝟓𝟗𝟐𝟕𝟓-🄴

12 Sept 2026, 18:32 UTC15 viewsread 15 September 2026

من نمیدونم اینجا چند نفر فن چارلز و اریک از ایکس من عزیزم هستن ولی! چارلز و اریک، وایب هنیبال و ویل رو نمیدن؟

Signed 𝟖𝟓𝟗𝟐𝟕𝟓-🄴

12 Sept 2026, 17:34 UTC16 views2 reactionsread 15 September 2026

اینو اتفاقا موقع کات به یکی از اکسام گفتم. قبول نمیکرد که خیلی ساده و محترمانه کات کنیم. هی میپرسید "چرا؟ چرا من نه؟ چرا؟ چرا؟ چرا؟" من بهش خیلی توصیح دادم ولی براش قانع‌کننده نبود بعد تهش بهش گفتم "ببین، تو سیبی. من دنبال پرتقالم. هر کسی علایق مختلف داره." اونم واکنشش این بود که "برای من حرف از میوه فروشی نزن." 🙏🏽🙏🏽🙏🏽

🤣2

12 Sept 2026, 17:31 UTC16 views2 reactionsread 15 September 2026

میدونید ... من واقعا آدم جالب و خوبی نیستم. با صدف عزیزم چند وقت پیش داشتیم راحع به چنین چیزی حرف میزدیم. میگفت "اصن نمیشه دنبال یکی باشی که تاکسیک نباشه و ویژگی‌های منفی نداشته باشه. هممون اینا رو داریم." و منم کاملا باهاش موافق بودم و حرف رو ادامه دادم که "علف باید به دهن بزی شیرین باشه. اگه اون علف و اون ادم برای شیرین بود، ادامه بده؛ اگه نه، برو سر بعدی." ویژگی که از نظر خودت فوق‌العاده‌س، شاید از نطر من خیلی ه

❤‍🔥2

12 Sept 2026, 09:45 UTC19 views3 reactionsread 15 September 2026

راجع به کپی، میتونید singing in the rain رو ببینید. یه فیلم کلاسیک و قدیمیه. ایده‌اش رو هزار تا فیلم برداشتن و احتمالا همین الانم کلی فیلم با اون ایده دیدید، اما! نکته فیلمش اینه که کپی کار تهش دستش رو میشه و همیشه مجبوره زیر سایه شما باقی بمونه.

3

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @TWL_34. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“TWL” (@TWL_34), 15 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TWL_34.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.