Photo, posted without a caption
❤9👍1

Channel
@T_almurabi
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
6,133subscribers
-21 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002176138475 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @T_almurabi |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/T_almurabi |
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 06:40 | 6,133 | +11 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 17:20 | 6,122 | +3 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 21:59 | 6,119 | -3 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 04:01 | 6,122 | -10 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 07:04 | 6,132 | -1 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 09:42 | 6,133 | -13 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 19:42 | 6,146 | +8 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 04:07 | 6,138 | -2 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 07:37 | 6,140 | +1 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 09:16 | 6,139 | -6 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 18:13 | 6,145 | -8 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 20:36 | 6,153 | -1 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 16:31 | 6,154 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 19 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
231 reactions across 19 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 71.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 166 | 71.9% | |
| 👍 | 57 | 24.7% | |
| ⚡ | 3 | 1.30% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 1.30% | |
| 👌 | 1 | 0.433% | |
| 😢 | 1 | 0.433% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 231 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 June 2026 to 28 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Photo, posted without a caption
❤9👍1
كان إماماً حافظاً مؤرِّخاً واسع العلم غزير المعرفة، اشتهر في الحديث والتفسير وعلوم القرآن؛ وقد قال عن نفسه: "قد رُزقتُ -ولله الحمد- التبحر في سبعة علوم: التفسير والحديث والفقه والنحو والمعاني والبيان والبديع"، إضافةً إلى أصول الفقه والجدل والتصريف، والإِنشاء والترسُّل والفرائض والقراءات والطب، غير أنه لم يقترب من علمي الحساب والمنطق. قال عنه تلميذه الداودي: "وكان أعلم أهل زمانه بعلم الحديث وفنونه رجالاً وغريبًا، ومتن…
❤3
قال الشهاب القادري ( ت903هـ) في الإمام السيوطي رحمه الله وكان من معاصريه : وإنَّ الجَلالِيَّ السُّيُوطِـيَّ للهدى. . لَكَوْكَبُ عِلْمٍ بِالضِِّيَا يتوقد وقَدْ جَادَ صَيْبُ العِلْمِ رَوْضَةَ اصله ..فَطَابَ له بِالعِلْمِ فَرْعٌ ومحتد فَلَوْ أَبْصَرَ الكُفَّارَ في العِلْمِ درسه ..وَقَدْ شَاهَدوا تَقْرِيْرَهُ لتشهدوا فَخُذْهَا جَلَالَ الدِّيْنِ فِي المِدْحِ كَاعِبًا ..لَهَا جِيْدُ حُسْنٍ بِالنُّجُوْمِ مقلد وَلَا …
❤3
📖✨ رحلة التكرار مع القرآن الكريم ✨📖 "القارئ يكرِّر حتى يحفظ والحافظ يكرِّر حتى يُثبِّت والمُثبِّت يكرِّر حتى يُتقِن والمُتقن يكرِّر حتى يرسخ" ليست هذه عباراتٍ تُقال… بل هي سُنَّةُ الطريق إلى القرآن، ورحلةُ عمرٍ تُعاش مع كتاب الله، تمضي فيها مع التكرار… حتى تلقى الله تعالىٰ. 🔹 التكرار… سرُّ الضبط والإتقان اعلم – وأنت تسير في طريق الحفظ – أنَّ أُسَّ الأسس ومفتاحَ الثبات ومربطَ الفرس: 👈هو التكرار. فلا يزهدنَّك فيه …
❤10👍3👏1
الحفظ هو بداية الرحلة… وليس نهايتها. كثيرٌ من الناس يظن أن أعظم إنجاز هو أن يختم حفظ القرآن الكريم، بينما الحقيقة أن الختم ليس نهاية الطريق، بل هو بداية مسؤولية جديدة. فالقرآن لم يُنزَّل ليكون محفوظًا في الصدور فقط، وإنما ليظهر أثره في القلوب، والأخلاق، والعبادات، والمعاملات، وفي كل تفاصيل الحياة. قد يحفظ الإنسان كتاب الله كاملًا، لكن يبقى السؤال الذي ينبغي أن يراجعه مع نفسه دائمًا: هل غيَّر القرآن حياتي؟ هل أصب…
❤11😢1
. كيف تنتقل من حافظٍ إلى معلِّم؟ فلا تضع نفسك في مقامٍ لم تتأهل له الانتقال من حافظٍ للقرآن إلى معلِّمٍ للقرآن ليس انتقالًا في المكانة، بل انتقالٌ إلى مسؤولية أعظم وأمانة أثقل. فالحفظ وحده لا يكفي، بل يحتاج معلم القرآن إلى صحة التلاوة، وإتقان التجويد، وفقه التعليم، وحسن التربية، والصبر، والرحمة، والقدرة على إدارة الحلقة، والاستمرار في التعلم والتزكية. ولا ينبغي للإنسان أن يتصدر قبل أن يتأهل، …
❤18👍11
Photo, posted without a caption
👍1
لماذا تتعثر بعض المؤسسات القرآنية رغم إخلاص العاملين فيها؟ كثير من الناس يظنون أن المشكلة تكمن في قلة الإمكانات أو ضعف الموارد، بينما تكشف الخبرة الميدانية أن كثيرًا من المؤسسات القرآنية تمتلك معلمين مخلصين، ومشرفين أكفاء، ومتطوعين محبين لكتاب الله، ومع ذلك لا تحقق الأثر الذي كانت تطمح إليه. السبب في كثير من الأحيان ليس ضعف الإخلاص… بل غياب الإدارة الاحترافية. فالإخلاص هو روح العمل، أما الإدارة فهي التي تحول هذا …
❤8👍1
Photo, posted without a caption
لماذا يفشل بعض الناس في حفظ القرآن رغم كثرة التكرار؟ يظن كثير من طلاب القرآن أن كثرة التكرار وحدها كافية لصناعة الحفظ المتقن، فيكرر الصفحة عشرات المرات، ثم يفاجأ بعد أيام أن الحفظ قد ضعف أو بدأ يتفلت. والحقيقة أن التكرار وحده لا يصنع الإتقان، وإنما يكون نافعًا إذا صاحبه: ✅ تركيز وانتباه. ✅ فهم لمعاني الآيات. ✅ ربط بين الآيات والمقاطع. ✅ مراجعة منتظمة. ✅ تسميع على معلم أو متقن. ✅ خطة واقعية يمكن الاستمرار عليها. ✅ ا…
❤23👍1
Photo, posted without a caption
❤2👍2
من أراد حفظ القرآن الكريم بلا جدول ثابت، فقد جعل حفظه تابعًا للفراغ والمزاج والظروف. والفراغ لا يأتي دائمًا، والمزاج لا يستقر، والظروف لا تنتظم. لذلك يحتاج طالب القرآن إلى جدول يومي واضح، لا يكون معقدًا، لكنه يكون ثابتًا ومنظمًا. والجدول الناجح لا يعني أن تملأ يومك كله بالحفظ، بل أن تجعل للحفظ مكانًا ثابتًا لا يضيع مهما كانت مشاغلك. أنت لا تحتاج إلى جدول مثالي، بل إلى جدول واقعي تستطيع الالتزام به والاستمرار عليه…
❤13👍8👏1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @T_almurabi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“الشيخ مصطفى عرفة معلم القرآن المربي” (@T_almurabi), 6,133 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/T_almurabi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.