Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for تحلیل فوری

Channel

تحلیل فوری

@Tahlil_Fouri

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

17,628subscribers

-269 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001126598648
TypeChannel
Username@Tahlil_Fouri
Description⚽️ دریافت تحلیل‌های سیاسی، اجتماعی و اقتصادی ایران و جهان 👓 سفارش تبلیغات:👇 🆕 @Ads_Fouri2 ارسال خبر + انتقاد و پیشنهادات👇 🗣 @AloTahlil_BOT خبرهای فوری🔖 ✅ @Khabar_Fouri لیست کانال‌ها👇 https://channels.fouri.co/
CreatedBetween 1 June 2017 and 30 September 2020 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 November 2026
Measurements held64
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/Tahlil_Fouri

Topic

International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 55% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

17,61617,89717,756.517,6286 August 20267 November 2026
64 measurements spanning 93 days, net -269. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 17,574–17,939 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 64
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Nov 2026, 06:4917,628-2
6 Nov 2026, 03:4817,630-7
5 Nov 2026, 06:4017,637-8
4 Nov 2026, 09:1917,645+7
3 Nov 2026, 06:2617,638-10
2 Nov 2026, 07:0017,648+18
1 Nov 2026, 05:5817,630-11
31 Oct 2026, 05:0117,641+5
30 Oct 2026, 07:5617,636-2
29 Oct 2026, 09:0417,638+14
28 Oct 2026, 05:1617,624-11
27 Oct 2026, 07:5817,635+11
26 Oct 2026, 10:0917,624-6
25 Oct 2026, 13:1917,630-15
24 Oct 2026, 14:3617,645+9
23 Oct 2026, 17:3917,636-6
22 Oct 2026, 20:0017,642-1
21 Oct 2026, 16:5817,643+27
20 Oct 2026, 09:5917,616-11
19 Oct 2026, 09:5517,627first reading

Engagement

967 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 65 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
2.88%
avg views ÷ 17,628 subscribers
Avg views / post
508
149 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.458%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
149
of 967 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 104 of 149 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026
Posts held967 (5 August 2026 – 7 November 2026)
Views total75,725
Reactions total288
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Nov 2026, 16:11 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈26,700
Videos
≈3,290
Links
≈304

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
9h 47m
Average length
2m 39s

Measured directly from 221 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

1,323 reactions across 502 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👏36927.9%
❤30723.2%
🤮22817.2%
👎20615.6%
😁906.80%
👌675.06%
💯241.81%
🤔110.831%
😢60.454%
😱60.454%
🤩50.378%
😭40.302%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 550 of the 967 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,359 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 967 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 7 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 5 of 149 posts held from the last 30 days (3.36%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

7 Nov 2026, 15:47 UTC92 views1 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Video

فریدون مجلسی: ساخت بمب اتم برای ایران ویرانگر است 🔹فریدون مجلسی، دیپلمات پیشین و تحلیلگر سیاسی، در مناظره با روح‌الله قادری کنگاوری هشدار داد که دستیابی ایران به سلاح هسته‌ای، به‌جای ایجاد بازدارندگی، می‌تواند پیامدهای ویرانگری برای کشور داشته باشد. مجلسی با تأکید بر اینکه قدرت‌های جهانی اجازه دستیابی آسان ایران به بمب اتم را نخواهند داد، گفت: 🔹باید بررسی کرد که چنین اقدامی امنیت کشور را افزایش می‌دهد یا خطر جنگ را…

👌1

7 Nov 2026, 15:46 UTC98 views1 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

رشیدی کوچی: جنگ را قطعی می‌دانم /آمریکایی‌ها نقشه‌های شومی برای ما کشیده‌اند جلال رشیدی کوچی: 🔹آمریکایی‌ها نقشه‌های شومی برای ما کشیده‌اند و در این جنگ کسی پیروز نخواهد بود. امیدوارم مردم کمترین آسیب را ببینند. 🔹تندروها یک زمانی به شهید بهشتی توهین و فحاشی می‌کردند، وضو می‌گرفتند و قربة إلی الله به شهید بهشتی توهین می‌کردند؛ در ایام جنگ و بعد از جنگ علیه بزرگان انقلاب موضع‌گیری می‌کردند. 🔹جالب است بدانید، یکی از آقا…

😁1

7 Nov 2026, 15:03 UTC197 views1 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Video

اعتراف بی‌شرمانه پسر فرح به حمایت از بمباران ایران؛ از درخواست مداخله نظامی عذرخواهی نمی‌کنیم! 🔹رضا پهلوی، پسر فرح با دفاع از حمایت خود از حمله نظامی به ایران، صراحتاً اعلام کرد که از این موضع عذرخواهی نمی‌کند؛ حتی اگر پای بمباران کشور و مداخله نظامی خارجی در میان باشد! 👓 @Tahlil_Fouri

👏1

7 Nov 2026, 13:45 UTC121 viewsread 7 November 2026
Photo

آیا برند شما ظرفیت پاسخگویی به صدها هزار بازدید روزانه را دارد؟🪙 اگر بله، پکیج ۲۰۰ کانال، شتاب‌دهنده فروش شما در آذرماه است.✅ 🆔 @Rasa_Ads_Bot

7 Nov 2026, 13:12 UTC249 views1 reactionsread 7 November 2026

استاد روابط بین الملل: نتایج انتخابات آمریکا دست ترامپ را برای حمله به ایران نمی‌بندد /ترامپ تا ژانویه ممکن است حمله به ایران را از سر بگیرد محسن جلیلوند: 🔹نباید تصور کرد که نتایج انتخابات میان‌دوره‌ای به‌تنهایی می‌تواند مانع تصمیم ترامپ برای حمله نظامی شود. 🔹نمی‌توان صرفاً با استناد به پیروزی دموکرات‌ها نتیجه گرفت که احتمال اقدام نظامی آمریکا علیه ایران از بین رفته است. ترامپ تا ژانویه ممکن است حمله به ایران را از …

👏1

7 Nov 2026, 12:19 UTC274 views1 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Video

پیشوایی: بالاتر از NPT یک سطح بالاتری از شفافیت و بازرسی‌ها را برای نشان دادن حسن نیت پذیرفتیم /خیلی از آنها به تصویب مجلس هم نرسید رئیس سازمان بسیج اساتید کشور: 🔹ما بالاتر از NPT یک سطح بالاتری از شفافیت را پذیرفتیم؛ یک‌سری پروتکل‌های الحاقی که برخی از کشورها نپذیرفته بودند، داوطلبانه پذیرفتیم، با اینکه خیلی از این‌ها حتی به تصویب مجلس هم نرسید؛ یعنی به‌صورت داوطلبانه و موقتا برای نشان دادن حسن نیت و شفافیت فعالیت‌…

👎1

7 Nov 2026, 12:04 UTC254 views1 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

ترامپ مثل مار زخمی عمل خواهد کرد /ایران به دنبال صلحی است که جنگ را برای ۵۰ سال متوقف کند حسین کنعانی مقدم، فرمانده پیشین سپاه پاسداران در گفت‌وگو با فرارو: 🔹با توجه به اختیارات رهبری بر اساس اصل ۱۱۰ قانون اساسی، تصمیم‌گیری درباره جنگ و صلح در حوزه اختیارات ایشان قرار دارد. 🔹ممکن است در جناح‌های مختلف درباره مسائل جنگ دیدگاه‌های متفاوتی مطرح شود، اما آنچه اهمیت دارد، تبعیت از تصمیم نهایی رهبری است. 🔹هدف باید رسیدن ب…

👎1

7 Nov 2026, 12:01 UTC241 views1 reactionsread 7 November 2026

برنامه اتمی در سایه جنگ؛ پارادوکس بازدارندگی و آسیب‌پذیری سجاد عابدی در خبرآنلاین نوشت: 🔹در نهایت، اگرچه در نگاه اول دستیابی به توان هسته‌ای شبیه به یک راهکار امنیتی به نظر می‌رسد، اما تحلیل استراتژیک نشان می‌دهد که در شرایط فعلی، این مسیر «هزینه‌محور» است تا «منفعت‌محور». 🔹امنیت ملی ایران در گروی ترکیبی از دیپلماسی هوشمند، تقویت اقتصاد مقاوم و ایجاد توازن قدرت بدون تحریک به جنگ است. 🔹تکیه بر برنامه اتمی-نظامی در سا…

👏1

7 Nov 2026, 11:58 UTC243 views5 reactionsread 7 November 2026

پاسخ دستیار قالیباف به جلیلی: طبق توافق اسلام‌آباد، حتی در صورت حمله مستقل اسرائیل به ایران، امکان حمله به منافع آمریکا در منطقه وجود دارد /سوءتفاهم توافقی است که شما برای تحویل اورانیوم به ترکیه و اوباما قبول کردید! محمدسعید احدیان دستیار قالیباف: 🔹سوءتفاهم واقعی، توافقی بود که شما در سال ۱۳۸۹ به‌عنوان مسئول پرونده هسته‌ای با ترکیه و برزیل نهایی کردید؛ توافقی که ایران متعهد شد ۱۲۰۰ کیلوگرم اورانیوم خود را به امانت …

👌3❤1🤮1

7 Nov 2026, 11:53 UTC237 viewsread 7 November 2026
Photo

برهانی، تحلیلگر مسائل خاورمیانه: در انتخابات اخیر کنگره، برای نخستین بار انتقاد از اسرائیل تبدیل به یک عامل رای‌آور برای نامزدها شد 🔹به نظر می‌رسد دوره طلایی حمایت آمریکا از اسرائیل تمام شده است. 🔹با پیروزی دموکرات‌ها، احتمال جنگ کاهش یافته است. عضو هیات علمی دانشکده مطالعات جهان دانشگاه تهران به جماران گفت: 🔹در حالیکه تا پیش از این انتقاد از اسرائیل یک ضدسرمایه بود و موجب ریزش آرای نامزدهای انتخابات می‌شد، اکنون ب…

7 Nov 2026, 11:51 UTC236 views1 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

دموکرات‌ها و جمهوری‌خواهان در آمریکا شاید رقیب انتخاباتی باشند، اما در دشمنی با ایران عزیز، یک اراده و یک نظر دارند حجت‌الاسلام‌والمسلمین محمد قمی، رئیس سازمان تبلیغات اسلامی در گفت‌وگو با میزان: 🔹درازگوش‌ها و درازخرطوم‌ها (دموکرات‌ها و جمهوری‌خواهان در آمریکا) شاید رقیب انتخاباتی باشند، اما در دشمنی با ایران عزیز، یک اراده و یک نظر دارند. 🔹حافظه سیاسی ملت‌ها را طوری دست‌کاری می‌کنند که تحریم، نفوذ، بحران‌سازی قومیت…

👌1

7 Nov 2026, 11:13 UTC123 viewsread 7 November 2026

آیا برند شما ظرفیت پاسخگویی به صدها هزار بازدید روزانه را دارد؟🪙 اگر بله، پکیج ۲۰۰ کانال، شتاب‌دهنده فروش شما در آذرماه است.✅ 🆔 @Rasa_Ads_Bot

Showing the 12 most recent of 967 posts we hold for @Tahlil_Fouri. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@Tahlil_Fouri edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
16 August 2026
Most recent edit
30 August 2026

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 16 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

️محمدرضا دانایی | Mreza Danaei️
@Mreza_Danaei · 19,177
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 2 October 2026
سلامت فوری 🍏
@Salamat_Fouri · 20,435
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 27 September 2026
ورزش فوری 🥇
@Sporte_Fouri · 25,633
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 13 September 2026
حوادث فوری ⚠️
@Havades_Fouri · 32,665
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 4 September 2026
اقتصاد فوری 📈
@Econ_Fouri · 44,192
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 28 August 2026
جهان بین‌الملل فوری🌍
@Jahan_Fouri · 80,462
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 18 August 2026
فناوری فوری📡
@IT_Fouri · 53,038
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 24 August 2026

This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“تحلیل فوری” (@Tahlil_Fouri), 17,628 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Tahlil_Fouri.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.