با تیم کاری مون جوین شوید از کف کف روند بازار بخرید و از سقف سقف روند بازار بفروشید و سرمایه خالص تون رو دو چند بسازید. تماس با مسول عضو گیری 👇👇 @Craz_dectatoor 👈

Channel
تحلیل تومن 🇮🇷طلا و نقره 🇦🇫
@Talahno_Tooman
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
16,308subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001427267114 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Talahno_Tooman |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 2 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 25 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 2 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Talahno_Tooman |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2 Sept 2026, 19:03 | 16,308 | -9 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 20:07 | 16,317 | +39 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 18:56 | 16,278 | -5 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 18:38 | 16,283 | -5 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 17:17 | 16,288 | -19 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 20:29 | 16,307 | -6 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 20:42 | 16,313 | -14 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 18:59 | 16,327 | -9 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 22:14 | 16,336 | -11 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 19:28 | 16,347 | -14 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 05:02 | 16,361 | +1 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 15:55 | 16,360 | -2 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 12:35 | 16,362 | +131 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 13:34 | 16,231 | -15 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 15:54 | 16,246 | +30 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 17:48 | 16,216 | -15 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 16:14 | 16,231 | -17 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 00:03 | 16,248 | -21 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 12:08 | 16,269 | -15 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 15:27 | 16,284 | first reading |
Engagement
89 posts held, back to 26 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 48 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 13.9%
- avg views ÷ 16,308 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 2,270
- 83 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.198%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 83
- of 89 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 49 of 83 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 89 (26 July 2026 – 2 September 2026) |
| Views total | 188,612 |
| Reactions total | 278 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 2 Sept 2026, 17:07 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
325 reactions across 55 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 71.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 231 | 71.1% | |
| 👍 | 30 | 9.23% | |
| 🥰 | 21 | 6.46% | |
| ❤🔥 | 17 | 5.23% | |
| 🎉 | 17 | 5.23% | |
| 🫡 | 5 | 1.54% | |
| 💯 | 4 | 1.23% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 55 of the 89 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 325 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 89 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
از تاریخ 30 اگست الی اکنون مطابق این راهنمایی نوسان گیری کردیم ✅
تاریخ 29 اگست هر بالایی و برگشت سمت 380 الی 400 فروشنده چک تومن شدیم هدف 300✅
تاریخ 26 اگست ✅👆
با تیم کاری مون جوین شوید از کف کف روند بازار بخرید و از سقف سقف روند بازار بفروشید و سرمایه خالص تون رو دو چند بسازید. تماس با مسول عضو گیری 👇👇 @Craz_dectatoor 👈
نمونه های بعدی بزودی نشر میگردد 😎
همچنان گفتیم هدف 1980 فعال است ✅ ساعت 7:58✅
مجدد دیروز تاریخ 1 September هر بالایی و برگشت سمت 2060 و 2065 نقره فروختیم هدف 1980✅
دیروز تاریخ 1 September زیر عدد 2050 کاملا حفظ دالر نمودیم هدف 1980✅ دقیقا کابل 1980 شد 💪✅
با تیم کاری مون جوین شوید از کف کف روند بازار بخرید و از سقف سقف روند بازار بفروشید و سرمایه خالص تون رو دو چند بسازید. تماس با مسول عضو گیری 👇👇 @Craz_dectatoor 👈
❤5
تا زمانیکه روند بازار نزولی هست هر بالایی و برگشت سمت 2080 الی 2100 فروشنده نقره شدیم تاریخ 31 اگست ✅
❤2
نوت : ✍ در کار ما دروغ اصلا جای ندارد، تحلیل 100 فیصدی نداریم، تحلیل های نقره و طلا 80 الی 90 فیصد با واقعیت بازار همخوانی دارد. افراد که زرگر و صراف باشد میتواند بهترین مفاد را روزانه از بازار کسب نماید. افراد که صراف نیست و به معامله بلد نیست، در کانال خصوصی ما جای ندارد و زحمت نکشد. چون در دنیای معامله همه کاره تحلیلگر نیست، خود صراف و زرگر بیدار و هوشیار باشد.
👍5❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 89 posts we hold for @Talahno_Tooman. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 6,117 of 1,630,085 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@kabul_dalarr_Toman · 121,288
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 21 August 2026
@rahimallahjan1 · 75,552
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 21 August 2026
@mzar_dalar · 47,636
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 26 August 2026
@ZB_DR · 147,882
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 11 August 2026
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“تحلیل تومن 🇮🇷طلا و نقره 🇦🇫” (@Talahno_Tooman), 16,308 subscribers as measured 2 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Talahno_Tooman.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.