easy
💩250🤯40🤣8❤3👀3😱2🌚1💊1

Channel
@Team_Gemberry78
On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
24,301subscribers
+1,737 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1002356846718 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Team_Gemberry78 |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 34 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Team_Gemberry78 |
Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
13,500 average views per post against 24,301 subscribers — an engagement rate of 55.6%. Across the 1,891 registered channels in the same cohort — 10,002–31,616 subscribers, posting mainly in Chinese — the middle half sit between 1.57% and 8.38%, with a median of 3.52%.
| Window | 30 days (22 August 2026 – 21 September 2026) |
|---|---|
| Posts measured | 21 of 21 published in the window (0 exact, 21 rounded by Telegram) |
| Views totalled | 283,640 |
| Mature posts only | 60.4% over 18 posts read at least 24h after publication |
| Subscribers | 24,301 measured 18 September 2026 |
| Cohort | b10000:zho · 1,891 channels · p10 0.468% · p25 1.57% · p50 3.52% · p75 8.38% · p90 16.2% |
| Position in cohort | 99.206th percentile · 15.8× the cohort median |
| Uncertainty | ±0.124% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding |
| Post language | Chinese · 100.0% of the window’s posts |
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 21 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 20:17 | 24,301 | -17 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 14:20 | 24,318 | +4 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 21:00 | 24,314 | -3 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 06:37 | 24,317 | -7 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 11:41 | 24,324 | +5 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 17:36 | 24,319 | -2 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 12:02 | 24,321 | +124 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 15:59 | 24,197 | +263 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 09:04 | 23,934 | +104 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 08:27 | 23,830 | +220 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 07:29 | 23,610 | +109 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 04:18 | 23,501 | +121 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 07:53 | 23,380 | +248 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 10:23 | 23,132 | +1 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 11:18 | 23,131 | +3 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 13:46 | 23,128 | +8 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 16:02 | 23,120 | +7 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 15:44 | 23,113 | -5 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 23:44 | 23,118 | +2 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 15:44 | 23,116 | first reading |
60 posts held, back to 25 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 58 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 60 (25 July 2026 – 3 September 2026) |
| Views total | 283,640 |
| Reactions total | 4,648 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 10:53 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
9,286 reactions across 59 posts, in 44 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💩 | 4,270 | 46.0% | |
| ❤ | 966 | 10.4% | |
| 🤣 | 858 | 9.24% | |
| 👍 | 561 | 6.04% | |
| 😁 | 535 | 5.76% | |
| 🥰 | 449 | 4.84% | |
| 😱 | 424 | 4.57% | |
| 🤯 | 249 | 2.68% | |
| ⚡ | 195 | 2.10% | |
| 🤨 | 177 | 1.91% | |
| 🔥 | 133 | 1.43% | |
| 😭 | 95 | 1.02% | |
| 🍌 | 71 | 0.765% | |
| 🌭 | 57 | 0.614% | |
| 👏 | 50 | 0.538% | |
| ❤🔥 | 27 | 0.291% | |
| 🤩 | 25 | 0.269% | |
| 🤮 | 25 | 0.269% | |
| 👎 | 22 | 0.237% | |
| 😐 | 14 | 0.151% | |
| 24 further kinds | 83 | 0.894% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 59 of the 60 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9,286 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 60 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
easy
💩250🤯40🤣8❤3👀3😱2🌚1💊1
心月狐有一个中立狐狸形态,两个常驻战斗形态,三个阶段
🤯198💩26😱25❤5🤩3😁2
牛逼兄弟
💩239🤣101😁14❤4
WW 3.7部分新优化1(有更改可能,STC) 声骸优化:同名同属性未强化声骸可堆叠,堆叠后占用 1 格空间,堆叠上限等待测试服更新。
🥰273👍51💩40😱15🤯9❤8👏4🔥3
WW 3.7矩阵(可能更改,STC) 燎照之骑/封庭械囿/无冠者/天傀劫煞
💩252❤17🤨10👍4🙏2🎅1💅1
WW 3.7新声骸(可能更改,STC) 茜染怀想之花 二件套:治疗效果提升 五件套:角色提供治疗时,使队伍中角色攻击提升。若期间该角色获得同奏效果、触发同奏入场,攻击还会额外提升。
👍101😱67💩47❤8🤨6❤🔥1🤯1
WW 3.7新声骸(可能更改,STC) 镜影流电之瞬 二件套:导电伤害提升 五件套:角色为敌人添加【电磁效应】时,自身导电伤害提升,期间施放延奏技能使下一个登场的角色导电伤害提升。
💩111👍42🤨8❤3😱1
写错了是五件套,已编辑
💩213🤣15👏6❤1
WW 3.7新声骸(可能更改,STC) 衔梦照世之心 二件套:导电伤害提升 五件套:角色为敌人添加【电磁效应】时,或角色获得同奏效果、触发同奏入场时,自身暴击提升,导电伤害提升。
👍107💩12❤5😱5🔥2
Photo, posted without a caption
💩240😁30❤6🤬2🥰1
洛瑟菈Lucilla下期矩阵体力+1(可能更改,STC)
💩108🤨90👍8🥰7😁5😱3❤2🔥1
3.7 地图 不完整STC 梦枢天罗 梦玄溪山 心钥井 枢修机坊 梦构匣
💩82❤22😐2
Showing the 12 most recent of 60 posts we hold for @Team_Gemberry78. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Team Gemberry78” (@Team_Gemberry78), 24,301 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Team_Gemberry78.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.