Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Олег Телемский

Channel

Олег Телемский

@Telemsky

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

6,808subscribers

-21 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001781544694
TypeChannel
Username@Telemsky
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live29 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 29 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Telemsky

Growth

6,8036,8296,8166 August 2026 — 6,829 subscribers7 August 2026 — 6,827 subscribers11 August 2026 — 6,821 subscribers14 August 2026 — 6,819 subscribers17 August 2026 — 6,815 subscribers23 August 2026 — 6,805 subscribers26 August 2026 — 6,803 subscribers29 August 2026 — 6,808 subscribers6,8086 August 202629 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 22 days, net -21. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,799–6,833 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
29 Aug 2026, 09:256,808+5
26 Aug 2026, 16:376,803-2
23 Aug 2026, 23:576,805-10
17 Aug 2026, 18:086,815-4
14 Aug 2026, 17:266,819-2
11 Aug 2026, 01:336,821-6
7 Aug 2026, 18:506,827-2
6 Aug 2026, 22:186,829first reading

Engagement

49 posts held, back to 27 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 12 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
17.8%
avg views ÷ 6,808 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,210
38 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.25%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
38
of 49 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 37 of 38 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 August 2026
Posts held49 (27 July 202619 August 2026)
Views total46,052
Reactions total2,341
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken20 Aug 2026, 04:20 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2h 31m
Average length
25m 11s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

3,098 reactions across 48 posts, in 26 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1,19338.5%
❤‍🔥71022.9%
🔥40513.1%
👍39812.8%
💯912.94%
🎉662.13%
👏491.58%
custom 5388992618451448101260.839%
😁240.775%
🤔230.742%
🙈210.678%
🗿140.452%
👀130.42%
😍120.387%
😈110.355%
custom 5253555484811610534100.323%
custom 538883266957437849060.194%
custom 544282253449390977660.194%
🤷50.161%
🤝40.129%
6 further kinds110.355%

Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 48 of the 49 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,098reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 49 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 19 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 49 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Telemsky. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 49 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 July 2026 to 19 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

19 Aug 2026, 17:58 UTC484 views32 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Forwarded from @castaliabooksVideo

Каждый, идущий по пути самопознания, в какой-то момент ловил себя на том, что видит в других людях свое отражение. Это свойство — одно из центральных для человеческой психики, и в Юнгианской психологии называется механизмом проекции. Знания о его работе дают ключ к пониманию огромного пласта как межличностных отношений, так и собственных переживаний. А углубиться в них поможет книга Марии-Луизы фон Франц, которая, к

19🔥9👍4

19 Aug 2026, 09:02 UTC699 views53 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

В отношений к мифу, мифологии, легендам, религиозным историям есть две одинаково грубые ошибки, от которых я хочу сразу предостеречь вас, читающих мою книгу. Первая — ошибка рационалиста, для которого миф — это «всего лишь выдумка»... Последовательные рационалисты обречены болтаться на поверхности, не в силах заглянуть вглубь вещей и утверждая, что ничего, кроме этой поверхности, не существует... Вторая же ошибка пря

24🔥14👍12❤‍🔥3

18 Aug 2026, 17:04 UTC862 views76 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Продолжаю читать Юнга. Доклад "Женщина в Европе". Для начала — немного вырванной из контекста цитаты. "Быть респектабельным означает, как подсказывает само слово, быть замеченным. Респектабельный человек — это тот, кто оправдывает общественные ожидания, кто носит идеальную маску, а если коротко — мошенник". Ааааа. Это восхитительно, это великолепно, это выше всех похвал. Это удар ниже пояса всей эпохе. Вообще, по

39👍18❤‍🔥12👏5👀2

18 Aug 2026, 09:05 UTC964 views40 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

СИМВОЛЫ ЗЛА В КАББАЛЕ Каббалисты отождествили зло с рядом символов и идей, проясняющих, что зло, неявное в Боге, коренится в самом Его совершенстве и добре, особенно в Его благодетельности как творца вселенной. Каждый из символов “творческого зла” связан с каббалистической идентификацией Ein-Sof с Ayin (Небытием). Как нам известно из Главы II, каббалисты, обычно называвшие Бога “Бесконечным Единством”, также придер

25🔥11👍4

17 Aug 2026, 17:09 UTC≈1,020 views94 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Продолжаем читать Юнга. Одним из расхожих обвинений со стороны фрейдистов в адрес Юнга было то, будто он не смог принять сексуальную теорию Фрейда в силу пуританства и ханжества. Однако прежде чем верить какой-либо из сторон, давайте внимательно и подробно почитаем всё, что писали оба. Фрейд пишет о сексуальности как бы "с оглядкой" — во многих местах в тексте буквально извиняясь, что ему приходится затрагивать ст

👍3730😁20❤‍🔥7

17 Aug 2026, 12:31 UTC955 views59 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Forwarded from @TOLTECessayPhoto

ТОЛТЕК РЕКОМЕНДУЕТ 🪬 У меня часто спрашивают с какого произведения начать знакомиться с Карлом Юнгом. Теперь у меня есть ответ. Рекомендую книгу Олега Телемского «Суверенное юнгианство. Вводный курс по юнгианской психологии» Я сам, не будучи юнгианцем, смог найти в ней ответы на все интересующие вопросы и понять психологию бессознательного глубже, чем ожидал. ЧИТАТЬ ДАЛЕЕ...

❤‍🔥35🔥116custom 53889926184514481014👏3

17 Aug 2026, 12:31 UTC971 views7 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Отзыв на одну из моих самых главных книг.

🤝43

17 Aug 2026, 09:04 UTC≈1,120 views99 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Часто люди бессознательно ищут священное пространство. Они чувствуют нарастающее волнение, им кажется, что вот-вот произойдёт что-то чудесное — или же напротив, их тяготит некое тревожное предчувствие. Они начинают искать свою инициацию. Порой они ищут земной рай — в Лас-Вегасе, на Карибах или в Европе — или ещё где-то, куда заведёт их фантазия. Некоторые присоединяются к Корпусу мира, другие работают в городской цер

❤‍🔥52👍16🔥1512💯3custom 52535554848116105341

16 Aug 2026, 19:55 UTC≈1,220 views83 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Отовсюду долетают обсуждения "Одиссеи". Мнения - разные, от "это шедевр" до "большего отстоя трудно представить". Видимо, всё-таки придётся смотреть. Хотя очень не хочется, ибо по косвенным уликам я могу судить, что фильм мне не понравится. Меня очень зацепило аргументированное сравнение "Одиссеи" с "Воландом" — последней экранизацией "Мастера и Маргариты", которая мне чудовищно не понравилась, в блоге Морваэна. Инт

52👍15👏7🤔3👀2💯2🔥2

16 Aug 2026, 09:00 UTC≈1,280 views58 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Сверхчувственная красота, явленная в чувственной жен­ской красоте, есть волнующее и радостное выражение пла­тонизма андалузского мистика. Неизбежное следствие этой концепции имеет двойственную природу: прежде всегото, что принадлежит к области сверхчувственного, наделе­но женской красотой, как ангел, который явлен с чертами «принцессы среди греков»46; кроме того, все, на что изли­вается сияние сверхчувственного, оказ

36👍8🔥7❤‍🔥4😍2😘1

15 Aug 2026, 18:00 UTC≈1,380 views193 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Forwarded from @peresekaya_zerkalaPhoto

С Днем Рождения Меня!

🔥87🎉5032❤‍🔥11custom 54428225344939097766🙈4👏2😍1

15 Aug 2026, 18:00 UTC≈1,410 views81 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Празднуем день рождения моей любимой супруги

42🔥17❤‍🔥11🎉11

Showing the 12 most recent of 49 posts we hold for @Telemsky. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 66,477 of 1,628,524entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Inquizitor Library. Книги по магии и эзотерике.
@Inquizitor_Library · 41,708
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 29 August 2026
Fire walks with me
@chaoss_flame · 55,763
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 29 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Олег Телемский” (@Telemsky), 6,808 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Telemsky.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.