This is a test. TERRA | Subscribe
👍4👎1

Channel
@Terra_Secrets
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry
10,231subscribers
+2,897 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1003706142507 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Terra_Secrets |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 30 June 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Terra_Secrets |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 73% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Sept 2026, 01:57 | 10,231 | +459 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 04:36 | 9,772 | +816 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 10:44 | 8,956 | +220 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 22:24 | 8,736 | +252 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 17:58 | 8,484 | +432 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 08:54 | 8,052 | +194 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 00:02 | 7,858 | +132 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 01:07 | 7,726 | +88 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 10:27 | 7,638 | +132 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 11:06 | 7,506 | +105 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 02:01 | 7,401 | +65 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 12:41 | 7,336 | +2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:46 | 7,334 | first reading |
76 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 76 (31 July 2026 – 28 August 2026) |
| Views total | 83,917 |
| Reactions total | 1,546 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 28 Aug 2026, 17:17 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 40 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
2,826 reactions across 76 posts, in 32 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1,068 | 37.8% | |
| 👍 | 881 | 31.2% | |
| 💯 | 237 | 8.39% | |
| 🔥 | 117 | 4.14% | |
| 👏 | 73 | 2.58% | |
| 🤔 | 72 | 2.55% | |
| 🥰 | 68 | 2.41% | |
| 🤬 | 57 | 2.02% | |
| 👀 | 35 | 1.24% | |
| 😈 | 30 | 1.06% | |
| ❤🔥 | 26 | 0.92% | |
| 🤣 | 24 | 0.849% | |
| 🥴 | 22 | 0.778% | |
| 👎 | 19 | 0.672% | |
| 😱 | 17 | 0.602% | |
| ✍ | 13 | 0.46% | |
| 🙏 | 9 | 0.318% | |
| 😁 | 8 | 0.283% | |
| 🤡 | 8 | 0.283% | |
| 🤩 | 7 | 0.248% | |
| 12 further kinds | 35 | 1.24% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 76 of the 76 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,826 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 76 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
This is a test. TERRA | Subscribe
👍4👎1
Incredible beauty! 😍 The deep blue waters of Elk Lake stretch out beneath the rugged peaks of South Sister and Broken Top—a moment of pure magic in the Cascades. Elk Lake, Oregon, USA. 🇺🇸 TERRA | Subscribe
❤12👍4
Human biologist Gary Brecka explains why seed oils are so harmful to the human body. "When you put a canola plant... into a commercial press, it comes out gummy, and you degum it with hexane, which is a known neurotoxin." "You need to deodorise it with sodium hydroxide, which is a very powerful carcinogen." "And then you sometimes bleach it before you bottle it and put it on the shelf." TERRA | Subscribe
👍25❤9🔥4🤪1
❗️DEPOSITS in the large intestine – the hidden cause of fatigue and cancer. To cleanse it, all you need to do is stop... My name is Emily Johnson, and at the age of 26, I was diagnosed with a blood clot in my heart. The doctors just shrugged and said: “It’s either surgery or a coffin.” But my husband didn’t give up. He found a doctor from the Appalachian Mountains – Dr. Michael Stevenson. On his channel “The Hidden…
❤15🤡1
Nowadays everything feels so similar and standardized it just makes you sigh. TERRA | Subscribe
❤37👏12👍6🥰1🆒1
😱 A photo of a “cigar-shaped UFO” above Earth has been found in the NASA archives! 🛸 People online are discussing a NASA photo with the reference number S66-63029_G12-S_f, dated September 2013, which shows an elongated, cigar-shaped object near Earth, with some believing it to be space debris or a camera glitch, while others point out that the object’s shape and scale appear too unusual for a standard explanation. …
👍28🤣13❤5👀1👎1
The airships weren't remove because they were unsafe, but because they could reach places no other form of transport could! TERRA | Subscribe
👍56❤12🥴5💊2🤔1
🌪 A waterspout formed in the Ligurian Sea near the town of Boljasco, Italy. Water spouts often occur in unstable atmospheric conditions, when warm, moist air near the surface meets cooler air at higher altitudes. This creates conditions for the development of powerful cumulonimbus clouds, which serve as the “cradle” for water spouts. TERRA | Subscribe
👍26❤10🙏3
❗️Get upset, be lazy, and worry—and you’re guaranteed to die by age 60 Linji Yixuan is the most famous kung fu master in China. He lived to be 103 and, in his time, taught over a hundred monks how to live without mental burdens This Chinese master became famous for his original technique, which, in just 3 minutes, eliminates fatigue and relieves stress and tension from the mind. You can find it on the “Hidden Welln…
👍13❤7🤔2
Don't speak negatively about yourself even as a joke. When Bruce Lee talked about this, he wasn't being poetic. He was being precise. Your body doesn't understand sarcasm. It only understands signals. Every word you repeat becomes a command. Every label you use becomes an identity. That's why words carry energy and why they shape how you think, move, and feel. Change the way you speak about yourself and it will…
👍34💯16❤13✍1🤔1
A Land Before Time🌳 TERRA | Subscribe
❤39👍11👀3😢2
🤯 India is one of the most mysterious and mystical countries—its culture is truly impressive. ⛏️⛓️💥 What technologies did the ancient artisans possess that allowed them to decorate granite stones with carvings and even carve chains out of them? Archaeologists have yet to discover any tools, blueprints, or references to the methods used to create such striking elements. The photo shows the Varadharaja Perumal Templ…
👍14👏14🔥5💊1🥰1
Showing the 12 most recent of 76 posts we hold for @Terra_Secrets. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@Terra_Secrets edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“TERRA | Secrets of the Planet” (@Terra_Secrets), 10,231 subscribers as measured 13 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Terra_Secrets.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.