Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 75% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
31 measurements spanning 48 days, net +945. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,663–13,892 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 31
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
25 Sept 2026, 05:16
13,750
+86
17 Sept 2026, 09:15
13,664
+10
15 Sept 2026, 11:20
13,654
+68
13 Sept 2026, 22:40
13,586
+29
12 Sept 2026, 07:20
13,557
+23
10 Sept 2026, 01:19
13,534
+155
6 Sept 2026, 15:56
13,379
+50
4 Sept 2026, 07:00
13,329
+28
2 Sept 2026, 20:23
13,301
+38
1 Sept 2026, 18:39
13,263
+25
31 Aug 2026, 21:25
13,238
+21
30 Aug 2026, 19:13
13,217
+52
29 Aug 2026, 19:45
13,165
+113
28 Aug 2026, 21:42
13,052
+91
27 Aug 2026, 18:56
12,961
+20
26 Aug 2026, 20:18
12,941
+8
25 Aug 2026, 17:24
12,933
+9
24 Aug 2026, 20:03
12,924
+22
23 Aug 2026, 03:58
12,902
+23
20 Aug 2026, 15:42
12,879
first reading
Engagement
639 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 47 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
16.3%
avg views ÷ 13,750 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,250
142 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.942%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
143
of 639 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 140 of 142 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held
639 (7 August 2026 – 2 September 2026)
Views total
318,949
Reactions total
2,942
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
2 Sept 2026, 20:24 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
13,235 reactions across 619 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
7,500
56.7%
👍
2,618
19.8%
🔥
845
6.38%
🙏
802
6.06%
👌
472
3.57%
💯
463
3.50%
😁
341
2.58%
👏
194
1.47%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 619 of the 639 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 13,235 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 639 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Also Choice institutional Equities has interesting take on it.
Their estimate cited UltraTech's potential domestic wires & cables market share at 6-7% by FY30, with full-capacity revenue potentially around 9,000 crore by FY30-31
So they are not going to disrupt the wire and cables business the same way as they disrupted Paints business.
No need to panic so much.
On the positive side, if Aditya Birla group and other big business group want to enter Cable sector, it means they are seeing the future high growth of this sector.
.currently this sector is growing at 12-14% CAGR and some of the companies are growing at 30-35% CAGR.
So be bullish on cable and wire sector.
There is still a lot of room for Aditya Birla group in this sector.
Rakesh Ramanlal Shah, the owner & MD of Diamond Power is Gautam Adani's Brother in law
In hindi , we call it Jijaji जीजाजी.
जिनके आगे 'जी ',
जिनके पीछे 'जी ',
ऐसे होते हैं 'जीजाजी '😃
So obviously Diamond Power will be a big beneficiaryof Adani led Capex in power sector.
Now read this news carefully.
On 30th March 2025, there was a news that Adani Group and Aditya Birla Group are set to enter Wire &Cables business.
Aditya Birla group news is constantly in headlines, but where is Adani Group plan to enter Cable business.
It will not be in news because Adani Group abandoned the project silently after initial noise.
Because Launching an Adani led Cable manufacturing business meant …
Now read this old news of 30th March 2025 again and tell did you notice something interesting? There is an interesting thing hidden in this headline❓
You can tell in my DM in 5 minutes. If your answer is correct , I will publish here
This is an old news.
It talks about Adani Group and Aditya Birla group competing in high growth Wire& Cable sector.
Today Ultratech Cement started
Commercial production and that's why pressure on Cable stocks today
Companies likely to win orders from Powergrid
HVDC technology/equipment:
BHEL
Hitachi Energy
GE Vernova
Siemens
2. Transmission-line execution
KEC
Kalpataru
Other large transmission EPC players
Power Grid wins 3,244 crore HVDC project bid
Power Grid Corporation of India has won a bid for an HVDC transmission project valued at 3,244 crore, marking a significant contract win for the state-owned transmission utility
MK Exim promoter buys 49,182 shares
Promoter director Murli Wadhumal Dialani acquired 49,182 equity shares of MK Exim (India) Ltd for ₹30.22 lakh on August 31, 2026, raising his stake to 10.604%.
FINE ORGANIC INDUSTRIES: TO ACQUIRE 80% STAKE IN MALAYSIA’S OLEOFINE ORGANICS
Fine Organic to acquire 80% stake in Oleofine Organics, Malaysia.
Total acquisition cost: up to 80.28 Cr, payable in cash.
50% stake to be acquired from Smoothex Chemicals; 30% from existing unrelated shareholders.
Oleofine operates in specialty chemicals, aligned with Fine Organic’s core business.
FY26 turnover: 54.17 Cr.
Acquisiti…
👍11❤4
Signed TheAlpha10X Research
Showing the 12 most recent of 639 posts we hold for @TheAlpha10XClub. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@TheAlpha10XClub edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
24 August 2026
Most recent edit
24 August 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“TheAlpha10X” (@TheAlpha10XClub), 13,750 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TheAlpha10XClub.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.