Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for The Coin Portal

Channel

The Coin Portal

@TheCoinOnTon

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

77subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002011221199
TypeChannel
Username@TheCoinOnTon
Created25 April 2024measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live1 September 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 1 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/TheCoinOnTon

Growth

777877.511 August 2026 — 77 subscribers12 August 2026 — 77 subscribers26 August 2026 — 78 subscribers1 September 2026 — 77 subscribers11 August 20261 September 2026
4 measurements spanning 22 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 77–78 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
1 Sept 2026, 19:0877-1
26 Aug 2026, 06:5678+1
12 Aug 2026, 00:5477no change
11 Aug 2026, 03:1677first reading

Engagement

2 posts held, back to 25 April 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 2 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 May 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

86 reactions across 1 post, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 50444369287834512032225.6%
custom 50444339824358861301618.6%
custom 50441351557912996851214.0%
custom 504420313653366112089.30%
custom 504455249776345242955.81%
custom 504178361824706683944.65%
custom 504210447377891445644.65%
custom 504414075642865439944.65%
custom 504414405066856944744.65%
custom 504423132869899164444.65%
custom 504445081870768637833.49%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 2 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 86 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 2 most recent posts we hold, published 25 April 2024 to 11 May 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 May 2024, 22:21 UTC≈1,790 views86 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

The Coin —— $COIN is being protected by @Safeguard Click below to verify you're human

custom 504443692878345120322custom 504443398243588613016custom 504413515579129968512custom 50442031365336611208custom 50445524977634524295custom 50417836182470668394custom 50421044737789144564custom 50441407564286543994

Showing the 2 most recent of 2 posts we hold for @TheCoinOnTon. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“The Coin Portal” (@TheCoinOnTon), 77 subscribers as measured 1 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TheCoinOnTon.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.