Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ๐Ÿ†ƒ๐Ÿ…ฒ๐Ÿ…ฝ The Collective Network

Channel

๐Ÿ†ƒ๐Ÿ…ฒ๐Ÿ…ฝ The Collective Network

@TheCollectiveNetwork

On this record: Growth ยท Engagement ยท Reactions ยท Posts ยท Citations ยท Cite this entry

1,109subscribers

+9 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of 1,000โ€“3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001190400685
TypeChannel
Username@TheCollectiveNetwork
Created4 August 2021 โ€” measured โ€” cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 September 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/TheCollectiveNetwork

Growth

1,0991,1111,1056 August 2026 โ€” 1,100 subscribers6 August 2026 โ€” 1,100 subscribers7 August 2026 โ€” 1,099 subscribers13 August 2026 โ€” 1,100 subscribers20 August 2026 โ€” 1,101 subscribers27 August 2026 โ€” 1,104 subscribers30 August 2026 โ€” 1,107 subscribers2 September 2026 โ€” 1,111 subscribers6 September 2026 โ€” 1,109 subscribers1,1096 August 20266 September 2026
9 measurements spanning 31 days, net +9. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between โ€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean โ€œno change observedโ€, never โ€œinterpolatedโ€. The vertical axis spans 1,097โ€“1,113 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log โ€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Sept 2026, 14:171,109-2
2 Sept 2026, 09:061,111+4
30 Aug 2026, 08:241,107+3
27 Aug 2026, 04:181,104+3
20 Aug 2026, 02:221,101+1
13 Aug 2026, 04:251,100+1
7 Aug 2026, 09:541,099-1
6 Aug 2026, 12:181,100no change
6 Aug 2026, 10:461,100first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 19 January 2025 โ€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโ€™s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegramโ€™s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute โ€” we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

187 reactions across 19 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
โค5428.9%
๐Ÿ‘3719.8%
๐Ÿ”ฅ3116.6%
๐Ÿ’ฏ158.02%
๐Ÿฅฐ126.42%
โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ115.88%
๐Ÿ™115.88%
โšก84.28%
๐Ÿ’”31.60%
๐Ÿคฏ31.60%
๐Ÿ‘21.07%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ€” ๐Ÿ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ€” 4.34K, 1.2M โ€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโ€™s own count on each post โ€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ€” those same posts carry 187 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โ€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ€.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 January 2025 to 15 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

15 Jul 2026, 11:01 UTC111 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @TCNVIDEOARCHIVEVideo

๐ŸŸ€โฌฉ๐ŸŸ€โฌฉ๐ŸŸ€โฌฉ๐ŸŸ€โฌฉ๐ŸŸ€โฌฉ๐ŸŸ€โฌฉ๐ŸŸ€๐ŸŸ€โฌฉ๐ŸŸ€ ๐Ž๐ซ๐ข๐ ๐ข๐ง ๐จ๐Ÿ ๐ญ๐ก๐ž ๐‰๐ž๐ฐ๐ฌ ๐ŸŸ€โฌฉ๐ŸŸ€โฌฉ๐ŸŸ€โฌฉ๐ŸŸ€โฌฉ๐ŸŸ€โฌฉ๐ŸŸ€โฌฉ๐ŸŸ€๐ŸŸ€โฌฉ๐ŸŸ€ ๐Ÿ†‚แดแด แด‡ส€แด‡ษชษขษด โ˜…๐Ÿ†ƒ๐Ÿ…ฒ๐Ÿ…ฝโ˜… โ–ฌโธบโธบโธ™โœŸโธ™โธบโธบโ–ฌ

๐Ÿคฏ2๐Ÿฅฐ1

8 Nov 2025, 10:07 UTC841 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026

I just went to the Ingersoll Lockwood website because it's been a while. Look at what I found. A webpage that's linked to the official Whitehouse government website and it has Q in the address. This is the first time it's been this obvious that Q is real and we were right all along. https://www.whitehouse.gov/mysafespace/?q=il-1717-4-10-20-TIP-TOP-Tippy-Top-Shape

โค2๐Ÿ‘2๐Ÿ”ฅ1

4 Aug 2025, 14:15 UTC692 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @geopolitics_primeVideo

โš ๏ธ MRNA SHOTS COULD SLASH FERTILITY WORLDWIDE - EPIDEMIOLOGIST By 2030, up to 100M deaths could result directly or indirectly from the shots, says Nicolas Hulscher, MPH. โžก๏ธ Animal studies show a 60% loss of womenโ€™s primordial follicles โžก๏ธ A major human study (1.3M women) found 33% lower pregnancy success among the vaccinated โžก๏ธ Global birth rates for 2025 already โ€œextremely lowโ€ โ˜ ๏ธ Hulscher warns: humanity risks pโ€ฆ

4 Aug 2025, 14:13 UTC475 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @geopolitics_primeVideo

๐Ÿ’Š๐Ÿ’‰ Pfizer/Moderna vaccines cause DEADLY turbo cancers - Oncologist Dr. William Makis warns of extremely aggressive cancers following Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 vaccines โ€“ a phenomenon the medical establishment "pretends doesnโ€™t exist." According to Makis: ๐Ÿ”ถ Thousands report sudden, fast-growing cancers post-jab ๐Ÿ”ถ Top cases: lymphoma, brain (glioblastomas), breast, colon, and lung cancers ๐Ÿ”ถ These cancers often rโ€ฆ

๐Ÿ’”3

8 Jul 2025, 03:42 UTC501 views14 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

This is why I like Putin and I believe Russia is fighting for the good guys.

๐Ÿ”ฅ11โค3

1 Jun 2025, 13:46 UTC579 views23 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Happy Veterans Month

๐Ÿ’ฏ15โค5๐Ÿ‘3

25 May 2025, 14:00 UTC605 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

Expose the Federal Reserve System and Replace it with our own.

โค6

13 May 2025, 07:34 UTC477 views19 reactionsread 6 August 2026

11 months? Lol. My house burned down so I've been rebuilding. We're getting close then I'll be back. The more good you do the more evil will try to break you.

๐Ÿ™9๐Ÿ‘8โค2

28 Feb 2025, 17:07 UTC824 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @georgenewsVideo

In President Trumpโ€™s first week back in office he told the world that we were going to find the Jihadi terrorists that mean to do Americans harm and bring them ultimate Justice. In just the past week, under the leadership of our great Secretary of Defense, Pete Hegseth, our warfighters have killed five more high value targets. The dead terrorists include two members of Al Qaeda in Syria, and three members of ISIS in โ€ฆ

๐Ÿ”ฅ4โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ3๐Ÿ‘2

28 Feb 2025, 03:51 UTC886 views21 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

This lady goes by the name DATA. She's working with DOGE but not for DOGE. She might be one of the main people that saves America. Keep your eye on her she will expose the whole rats nest. ๐Ÿ†‚แดแด แด‡ส€แด‡ษชษขษด โ˜…๐Ÿ†ƒ๐Ÿ…ฒ๐Ÿ…ฝโ˜… โ–ฌโธบโธบโธ™โœŸโธ™โธบโธบโ–ฌ

๐Ÿฅฐ11โšก8โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @TheCollectiveNetwork. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels โ€” every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched โ€” that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayโ€™s namer to yesterdayโ€™s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ€” naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ€” the โ€œNamed by N registered channelsโ€ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 โ€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

โ€œ๐Ÿ†ƒ๐Ÿ…ฒ๐Ÿ…ฝ The Collective Networkโ€ (@TheCollectiveNetwork), 1,109 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TheCollectiveNetwork.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.