24 measurements spanning 25 days, net +40. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,188–10,286 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 24
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
1 Sept 2026, 09:26
10,239
+1
31 Aug 2026, 10:19
10,238
-8
29 Aug 2026, 10:09
10,246
-1
28 Aug 2026, 13:15
10,247
-2
27 Aug 2026, 10:26
10,249
+1
26 Aug 2026, 12:24
10,248
-6
25 Aug 2026, 13:24
10,254
-6
24 Aug 2026, 12:48
10,260
-7
22 Aug 2026, 19:35
10,267
-3
21 Aug 2026, 11:49
10,270
+1
20 Aug 2026, 14:13
10,269
+3
19 Aug 2026, 16:55
10,266
+1
18 Aug 2026, 16:58
10,265
-2
17 Aug 2026, 17:58
10,267
-1
16 Aug 2026, 15:55
10,268
-7
15 Aug 2026, 03:14
10,275
+4
13 Aug 2026, 18:18
10,271
+3
12 Aug 2026, 14:33
10,268
+28
11 Aug 2026, 14:02
10,240
+12
10 Aug 2026, 10:50
10,228
first reading
Engagement
45 posts held, back to 23 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 39 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
16.0%
avg views ÷ 10,239 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,640
28 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.62%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
28
of 45 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held
45 (23 March 2026 – 28 August 2026)
Views total
45,867
Reactions total
742
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
29 Aug 2026, 03:30 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
1,375 reactions across 45 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 65.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
900
65.5%
👍
188
13.7%
👏
49
3.56%
💯
47
3.42%
😢
44
3.20%
🔥
42
3.05%
😁
30
2.18%
🤔
24
1.75%
💔
18
1.31%
🤷♀
8
0.582%
⚡
5
0.364%
😨
5
0.364%
❤🔥
3
0.218%
🤡
3
0.218%
🏆
2
0.145%
🆒
1
0.073%
🕊
1
0.073%
🗿
1
0.073%
😐
1
0.073%
😭
1
0.073%
2 further kinds
2
0.145%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 45 of the 45 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,375 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 45 most recent posts we hold, published 23 March 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 45 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @TheDeepQuote. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 45 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 23 March 2026 to 28 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
WHEN THEY COME BACK
Sometimes, people return after you've learned to live without them. They bring familiar words and memories that make your heart hesitate. But missing someone isn't always a reason to reopen the door. Ask yourself whether they've changed or simply become lonely. Your healing deserves more than a temporary return from someone who left.
Deep Quotes☑
LETTING GO
Letting go doesn't mean you suddenly stopped caring. It means you finally accepted that caring alone cannot keep something alive. You can love someone and still choose distance. You can remember the good and still acknowledge the damage. Sometimes, moving forward means respecting what happened without allowing it to define what happens next.
Deep Quotes☑
This is one of the biggest differences between people: some optimize for comfort, others deliberately choose harder problems. Years later, the gap becomes huge.
Original post by Owner 1win
If I had to choose just one factor that determines whether a person will achieve a breakthrough in absolutely any endeavor - it would be ambition.
Not intelligence, and certainly not innate talent. All of that is secondary and can be developed. But you can't force a person to move forward if they don't internally want more and consciously go where the odds of success are below 30%. And do it without complaining abou…
SELF-RESPECT
Self-respect begins when you stop begging people to treat you like you matter. You stop chasing explanations from people who won't communicate. You stop proving your loyalty to someone committed to doubting you. It's painful at first, but freeing later. The moment you choose yourself, you teach others how to value your presence.
Deep Quotes☑
HEALING QUIETLY
Healing rarely looks beautiful while you're living through it. Some days, you feel strong. Other days, one memory takes you back somewhere painful. Don't mistake a difficult day for failure. Progress isn't forgetting what happened. It's noticing that the pain which once controlled your entire world no longer controls every part of you.
Deep Quotes☑
UNANSWERED QUESTIONS
Some questions stay unanswered because the person who caused the confusion doesn't have the honesty to explain it. You may spend months searching for clarity, but eventually realize their actions already answered you. Not every truth arrives through words. Sometimes, the absence of effort says everything you were afraid to hear.
Deep Quotes☑
CHOOSE YOURSELF
Maybe the deepest form of healing is realizing you don't need to be chosen by someone who couldn't see your value. You can grieve the love you wanted and still build a beautiful life. You can miss them and move forward. You can forgive them and never return. Choose yourself, even when it hurts.
Deep Quotes☑
THE PERSON YOU BECAME
You are not the same person who entered that relationship. You learned what disappointment feels like, what boundaries mean, and how quickly someone can become a stranger. Maybe the experience changed you. That's okay. Just make sure it changes you into someone wiser, not someone who believes they are impossible to love.
Deep Quotes☑
WHEN YOU'RE DONE
You don't always leave because you stopped loving them. Sometimes, you leave because loving them started costing too much of yourself. You become tired of waiting, guessing, and shrinking your needs. Walking away can hurt deeply while still being right. Sometimes, the bravest goodbye is the one that protects your future.
Deep Quotes☑
FEELING ALONE
Loneliness isn't always having nobody around. Sometimes, it's sitting beside someone and feeling completely unseen. You can talk all day and still feel unheard. That's why emotional connection matters. Being physically close isn't enough. The heart needs someone who notices the quiet changes, asks what's wrong, and genuinely stays for the answer.
Deep Quotes☑
THE LAST MESSAGE
Sometimes, the last message isn't the one you send. It's the one you decide not to send. You type everything you feel, read it again, then delete it. Not because your feelings aren't real, but because you finally understand that closure doesn't always come from another person. Sometimes, you create it yourself.
Deep Quotes☑
👍17❤8😁4
Showing the 12 most recent of 45 posts we hold for @TheDeepQuote. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 387,571 of 1,629,808 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Deep Quotes” (@TheDeepQuote), 10,239 subscribers as measured 1 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TheDeepQuote.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.