Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 76% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
6 measurements spanning 29 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 581–588 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Sept 2026, 15:56
582
-4
5 Sept 2026, 15:20
586
-1
29 Aug 2026, 11:56
587
+4
23 Aug 2026, 00:24
583
-2
14 Aug 2026, 09:15
585
no change
14 Aug 2026, 09:04
585
first reading
Engagement
15 posts held, back to 19 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1m 02s
Average length
1m 02s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
162 reactions across 14 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
87
53.7%
❤🔥
28
17.3%
💘
10
6.17%
🔥
10
6.17%
🐳
7
4.32%
👌
7
4.32%
👍
7
4.32%
💯
2
1.23%
🕊
2
1.23%
⚡
1
0.617%
💔
1
0.617%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 162 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 19 September 2025 to 27 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
توی این شرایط راهنمایی و کمک من برای شما :
از لحاظ روحی انگار سقوط کردیم به طبقه منفی یا انگار کشوندنمون به طبقه منفی ۱۰ ولی اینکه خودتون مدام این انرژی رو شدید تر کنین یا نکین ، دست خودتونه . اینکه منفی ده رو به توان ۲ کنین یا به توان ۱۰۰۰ کنین، به خودتون بستگی داره ..
من نمیگم روحیه مثبتی داشته باشین . نه . چون نمیشه . ولی میتونین روحیتون رو منفی تر و بدتر نکنین و انرژیتون پایین تر نبرین .
با استوری گذاشتن…
"3"
با توجه به اتفاقات رخ داده چند هفته اخیر در کشور عزیزمان؛
برخی مکان هایی که شاهد اتفاقات و فجایع بودهاند(مانند بازار بزرگ رشت) درحال حاضر به محلی برای حضور عظیم غیرارگانیک ها و پرتال های منفی بدل شدند که عدم آگاهی از آنها ممکن است نتایجی چون افت انرژی، احساس کوفتگی بیدلیل، احساسات منفی بیدلیل، برهم خوردن شرایط زندگی، چسبیدن موجودات غیر ارگانیک، اتصال انرژی افراد به پرتال های منفی و... برای افرادی شود که از ا…
"2"
...این امر در فضای اختری بستری برای ایجاد گردابههای فرکانس پایین و اتصال جهان ما به قلمرو هایی ایجاد میکند که موجودات حاضر در آن بعد از این فرکانس ها تغذیه میکنند و به جهان ما وارد میشوند.
از طرفی دیگر، فجایع کشتار جمعی باعث آن میشود که ارواح آنهایی که در آن حادثه به قتل میرسند دچار سردرگمی شوند و چون بصورت ناگهانی فوت کردهاند نمیتوانند وابستگی های خود در این جهان را ترک کنند و در نهایت نمیتوانند به زن…
"1"
یکی از راه های باز شدن پرتال ها از هرنوعی، تراکم انرژی بالا در یک منطقه است که در پهنه اتر موجب ایجاد گردابه های اختری میشود؛
خصوصا درمواقعی که انرژی ها و فرکانس های جمعی بر یک حس یا سری احساسات مشترک توافق نظر دارند و باعث تشدید فرکانس های بالا میشوند،
فرکانس هایی نظیر شکرگزاری، رضایت، شادی، عشق و ... اگر در سطح جمعی باشند به راحتی میتوانند گردابه هایی با فرکانس های بالا در فضای اختری ایجاد کنند که بدلیل ما…
درواقع میتوان به نوعی گفته شمس تبریزی را اینگونه تعبیر کرد: کشور ما ایران با تمدن چند هزار ساله خود درست همانند تمدن های پیشرفته زمان خود مورد تهاجمات این جهانی و غیر این جهانی قرار گرفت ، تنها با این تفاوت که از آن تمدن ها تنها اسمی باقی مانده ولی از ایران ، آن سرزمینی که هزاران سال پیش بود با وجود خرابی های عامدانه برای از بین بردن این تاریخ غنی و سرشار از معنویت گم گشته، باقی مانده .
در واقع ایران همان زخمی است که…
_سرآغاز رخداد...
مولانا شمس را گفت: "...پس زخم هایمان چه؟!..."
شمس پاسخ داد: "...نور از محل آنها وارد میشود..."
"به یاد داشته باشید که هیچ چیز در این جهان به جهت تصادف و اتفاق رخ نمیدهد..."
اگر بخواهیم اتفاقات اخیر کشور عزیزمان ایران را مرور کنیم به نکته بسیار قابل توجهی بر میخوریم، نکته ای که شاید در ظاهر امر بسیار بدیهی به نظر برسد اما بسیار قابل اهمیت در سرنوشت سیاره است.
بدون شک خیزش مردم ایران به دلیل افزا…
اون چیزا که تو تاریکی بهت گفتم
تو روشنایی بازش کن
هرچی که راه میری دل گشنه ست
هیجانتو رامش کن
از زمین که به ماه میری یه نقطه است
که تو نادونی خوابش برد
هر دفعه بهم تابیدی شعر گفتم و
دعای ساحری باطل شد، باطل شد...✨️
╔═══━━•⊰𓅓⊱•━━═══╗
@TheHouseOfPhoenix
#music
╚═══━━⊰☽︎⍟☾︎⊱━━═══╝
✨ پاکسازی انرژی و بازگشت به تعادل طبیعی ✨
امروز قراره یه مراسم براتون برگزار کنم! 🕉️
با روشن کردن شمعی ، انرژیهای غیرارگانیک رو از وجودتون پاکسازی میکنم و تعادل طبیعی و ارگانیک رو به جسم و روحتون برمیگردونم. 🕯️
هر نوع جادو، طلسم یا دعایی که ممکنه روی شما تأثیر گذاشته باشه رو با دقت تا عمیقترین لایهها پاک میکنم و آسیبهای بهجامونده رو ترمیم میکنم. 💫
برای ترمیم انرژی هاتون از انرژی کریستال ها و ریکی استفاده …
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @TheHouseOfPhoenix. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
taginmhmmd @ttaginmhmmd · 27,145 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 10 September 2026
آکادمی ساریسا حیدری @academysarisaheidari · 79,683 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 19 August 2026
Astrofarsisally @astrofarsisally · 116,663 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 14 August 2026
Astrology @shortastrology · 22,888 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 19 September 2026
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“"𝐏𝐘𝐑𝐀𝐋𝐈𝐒"” (@TheHouseOfPhoenix), 582 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TheHouseOfPhoenix.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
