Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for The Intercept BR

Channel

The Intercept BR

@TheInterceptBr

Verified by Telegram

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

13,131subscribers

+1,180 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001293168342
TypeChannel
Username@TheInterceptBr
DescriptionJornalismo destemido e sem amarras.
Created2 October 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 November 2026
Measurements held59
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 4 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/TheInterceptBr

Topic

National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

11,47913,13712,3086 August 2026 — 11,951 subscribers7 August 2026 — 11,943 subscribers7 August 2026 — 11,940 subscribers9 August 2026 — 11,932 subscribers10 August 2026 — 11,915 subscribers11 August 2026 — 11,908 subscribers12 August 2026 — 11,900 subscribers13 August 2026 — 11,893 subscribers14 August 2026 — 11,885 subscribers16 August 2026 — 11,880 subscribers17 August 2026 — 11,878 subscribers18 August 2026 — 11,872 subscribers19 August 2026 — 11,866 subscribers20 August 2026 — 11,870 subscribers21 August 2026 — 11,860 subscribers22 August 2026 — 11,831 subscribers24 August 2026 — 11,808 subscribers25 August 2026 — 11,795 subscribers26 August 2026 — 11,787 subscribers27 August 2026 — 11,782 subscribers28 August 2026 — 11,773 subscribers29 August 2026 — 11,761 subscribers30 August 2026 — 11,759 subscribers31 August 2026 — 11,745 subscribers1 September 2026 — 11,726 subscribers2 September 2026 — 11,716 subscribers3 September 2026 — 11,715 subscribers5 September 2026 — 11,700 subscribers9 September 2026 — 11,665 subscribers11 September 2026 — 11,659 subscribers13 September 2026 — 11,655 subscribers15 September 2026 — 11,642 subscribers17 September 2026 — 11,641 subscribers24 September 2026 — 11,620 subscribers3 October 2026 — 11,496 subscribers8 October 2026 — 11,479 subscribers12 October 2026 — 12,668 subscribers14 October 2026 — 12,759 subscribers15 October 2026 — 12,806 subscribers16 October 2026 — 12,858 subscribers17 October 2026 — 12,890 subscribers18 October 2026 — 12,910 subscribers19 October 2026 — 12,935 subscribers20 October 2026 — 12,950 subscribers21 October 2026 — 12,975 subscribers22 October 2026 — 12,986 subscribers23 October 2026 — 13,005 subscribers24 October 2026 — 13,032 subscribers25 October 2026 — 13,027 subscribers26 October 2026 — 13,034 subscribers27 October 2026 — 13,060 subscribers28 October 2026 — 13,082 subscribers29 October 2026 — 13,088 subscribers30 October 2026 — 13,095 subscribers31 October 2026 — 13,102 subscribers1 November 2026 — 13,112 subscribers2 November 2026 — 13,113 subscribers3 November 2026 — 13,137 subscribers4 November 2026 — 13,131 subscribers13,1316 August 20264 November 2026
59 measurements spanning 90 days, net +1,180. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,230–13,386 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 59
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Nov 2026, 12:5613,131-6
3 Nov 2026, 11:1213,137+24
2 Nov 2026, 12:3913,113+1
1 Nov 2026, 15:2613,112+10
31 Oct 2026, 14:2913,102+7
30 Oct 2026, 16:4813,095+7
29 Oct 2026, 20:1013,088+6
28 Oct 2026, 18:2913,082+22
27 Oct 2026, 18:1113,060+26
26 Oct 2026, 19:4013,034+7
25 Oct 2026, 18:5613,027-5
24 Oct 2026, 16:2713,032+27
23 Oct 2026, 19:2713,005+19
22 Oct 2026, 17:2712,986+11
21 Oct 2026, 13:3812,975+25
20 Oct 2026, 07:4912,950+15
19 Oct 2026, 04:3112,935+25
18 Oct 2026, 06:4712,910+20
17 Oct 2026, 08:1512,890+32
16 Oct 2026, 05:1712,858first reading

Engagement

67 posts held, back to 30 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 51 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
19.4%
avg views ÷ 13,131 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,550
21 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.32%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
21
of 67 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 November 2026
Posts held67 (30 June 2026 – 4 November 2026)
Views total53,573
Reactions total1,244
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken4 Nov 2026, 17:58 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈8
Videos
≈64
Links
≈3,260

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 4 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

2,288 reactions across 66 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤮78934.5%
👍52923.1%
🔥27512.0%
😁1717.47%
❤1416.16%
😱1235.38%
👎1094.76%
😢1044.55%
🎉351.53%
🤩120.524%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 66 of the 67 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,288 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 67 most recent posts we hold, published 30 June 2026 to 4 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 21 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

4 Nov 2026, 15:01 UTC353 views31 reactionsread 4 November 2026

Derrota eleitoral de Trump no Congresso enfraquece plano dos Bolsonaro nos EUA Por @TheInterceptBr

😁21🤩9👍1

31 Oct 2026, 10:12 UTC≈2,730 views73 reactionsread 4 November 2026

Sem mandato e temendo prisão, Flávio Bolsonaro foge e vira fardo para a extrema direita Por @TheInterceptBr

😁44🤮22❤4👍3

30 Oct 2026, 19:11 UTC≈1,860 views20 reactionsread 4 November 2026

Os desafios de disputar a comunicação além dos algoritmos da Meta Por @TheInterceptBr

❤20

29 Oct 2026, 17:36 UTC≈1,970 views30 reactionsread 4 November 2026

A fuga de Flávio Bolsonaro e o voo cego da imprensa Por @TheInterceptBr

👎20😁5😱5

29 Oct 2026, 16:06 UTC≈1,910 views53 reactionsread 4 November 2026

Nunes Marques botou TSE e eleição em risco ao fugir da responsabilidade de garantir o direito ao voto Por @TheInterceptBr

👍39❤6🔥5👎3

28 Oct 2026, 20:58 UTC≈1,860 views46 reactionsread 4 November 2026

Como governar com a extrema direita ainda no poder após a vitória de Lula Por @TheInterceptBr

👍33🔥8❤5

24 Oct 2026, 10:15 UTC≈3,120 views93 reactionsread 4 November 2026

Flávio Bolsonaro, o candidato que une milícia, Banco Master e negociata na lancha Por @TheInterceptBr

👍48🤮35❤7👎2😁1

23 Oct 2026, 22:14 UTC≈2,910 views47 reactionsread 4 November 2026

Documento obtido pela PF contradiz Flávio e aponta dinheiro ilegal de Vorcaro para ‘Dark Horse Por @TheInterceptBr

👍32🎉11❤3😁1

23 Oct 2026, 10:12 UTC≈2,780 views25 reactionsread 4 November 2026

Projeto de poder da extrema direita precisa da ideologia de gênero Por @TheInterceptBr

👍24😁1

22 Oct 2026, 20:40 UTC≈2,530 views43 reactionsread 4 November 2026

Deputado da ‘tropa’ de Flávio Bolsonaro fez gesto considerado racista na plateia durante debate da Band Por @TheInterceptBr

🤮41❤1😁1

21 Oct 2026, 22:07 UTC≈2,380 views41 reactionsread 4 November 2026

Insatisfação de fiéis mostra que apoio evangélico ao bolsonarismo foi fruto de assédio, não de consenso Por @TheInterceptBr

👍32🔥5😱3😁1

21 Oct 2026, 20:37 UTC≈2,270 views52 reactionsread 4 November 2026

Maiores doadores de Flávio Bolsonaro já foram denunciados por corrupção e contrabando Por @TheInterceptBr

🤮25🔥16😱10😁1

Showing the 12 most recent of 67 posts we hold for @TheInterceptBr. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

BBC News Brasil
@bbcbrasil · 32,374
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 2 September 2026
Metrópoles - Notícias
@metropolesurgente · 23,222
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 17 September 2026
Português com Prof. Juciano
@redacaoplay · 22,493
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 37 here — alongside 36 others — read 19 September 2026
CNN BRASIL
@CNNBRASIL · 22,518
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 9 September 2026
Telegram Brasil
@TelegramBR · 110,440
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 16 August 2026
GRUPO OFICIAL NATH ARCURI!
@jornadadadesfudencia · 102,307
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 16 August 2026
Dicas do Telegram
@TelegramTipsBR · 674,166
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 16 August 2026
Indian Airforce Navy Army Exams
@Indian_Airforce_Navy_Army_Exams · 128,005
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 14 August 2026

This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“The Intercept BR” (@TheInterceptBr), 13,131 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TheInterceptBr.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.