Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ساراچی

Channel

ساراچی

@TheSarachi

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

744subscribers

+7 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001672987370
TypeChannel
Username@TheSarachi
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live31 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 31 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/TheSarachi

Growth

7347447397 August 2026 — 737 subscribers7 August 2026 — 737 subscribers16 August 2026 — 738 subscribers24 August 2026 — 734 subscribers31 August 2026 — 744 subscribers7 August 202631 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 25 days, net +7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 733–746 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
31 Aug 2026, 18:28744+10
24 Aug 2026, 06:05734-4
16 Aug 2026, 03:55738+1
7 Aug 2026, 21:23737no change
7 Aug 2026, 04:01737first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 18 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

70 reactions across 11 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤‍🔥2535.7%
1825.7%
🤣1014.3%
😭710.0%
👍68.57%
🫡45.71%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 70 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 21:39 UTC119 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @sootehdelan333

6- خطای هزینه‌ی غرق شده (Sunk Cost Fallacy) پولی که خرج شده، زمانی که گذشته، یا انرژی‌ای که صرف شده، دیگه قابل بازگشت نیست؛ اما مغز ما سعی داره این هزینه‌هارو توجیه کنه. به همین دلیل افراد سال‌ها در یک رابطه ناسالم، یک شغل نامناسب یا یک پروژه شکست‌خورده باقی می‌مونن، فقط چون قبلا هزینه زیادی براش دادن. «جلوی ضرر رو هر موقع بگیری منفعته».

👍3

5 Aug 2026, 21:38 UTC115 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @sootehdelan333

10- اثر دانینگ–کروگر (Dunning–Kruger Effect) افرادی که دانش کمی دارن، معمولا از میزان ناآگاهی خود بی‌اطلائن و دانش‌شون رو فراتر از واقعیت ارزیابی می‌کنن. به همین دلیل اعتمادبه‌نفس بالایی هم دارن. در مقابل، افراد متخصص از پیچیدگی موضوعات آگاهن و با احتیاط بیشتری نظر می‌دن. «معمولا بلندترین صدا، متعلق به کم‌اطلاع‌ترین فرده».

👍3

3 Aug 2026, 14:03 UTC207 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

عوضش آرامگاه فردوسی بسیار زیبا بود.

7

2 Aug 2026, 23:58 UTC208 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @SaraBehzadir

دعوت به مشارکت در پژوهش از شما دعوت می‌کنیم در پژوهشی با هدف استانداردسازی نسخه فارسی یک ابزار روان‌شناختی درباره افسردگی، شرکت کنید. همه افراد ۱۸ تا ۶۰ ساله می‌توانند در این پژوهش شرکت کنند و داشتن خلق افسرده، ملاک نیست. شرکت در پژوهش کاملاً داوطلبانه است. اطلاعات شما کاملاً محرمانه خواهد بود و می‌توانید با نام مستعار یا کد در پژوهش شرکت کنید. نحوه همکاری: شرکت در یک مصاحبه‌ آنلاین (حدود ده دقیقه) پر کردن یک پرسش

2 Aug 2026, 22:45 UTC273 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026

اگر هیچی هیچی حس افسردگی ندارید و خیلی خوشحالید هم می‌تونید شرکت کنید 😁

🤣10

2 Aug 2026, 22:43 UTC264 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

این طرح پژوهشی منو اگر حوصله داشتید شرکت کنید. با همکارم مصاحبه می‌کنید که بهتون کد اختصاص میده و حتی به منم نمیگه کدوم کد توی سیستم، مال کیه. در نتیجه‌ش شدت افسردگی شما رو میفهمیم و اگر ارجاع نیاز داشتین همکارم راهنماییتون می‌کنه و اگر افسرده نبودید، که خداروشکر. در نهایت شما با شرکت در این پژوهش به فهم بیشتر شدت افسردگی با یک ابزار که قراره معیار سنجش اثربخشی درمان‌های دارویی و روانشناختی‌ افسردگی در ایران باشه،

5

28 Jul 2026, 07:41 UTC423 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

چقدر اواخر این اپیزود از پادکست رخ، شبیه ایران این روزهاست.

6

22 Jul 2026, 09:22 UTC601 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026

عملا معیارهای روانپزشک‌ خوب رو براتون نوشتم تو پیام بالا :))

❤‍🔥10

22 Jul 2026, 09:22 UTC605 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026

روانپزشک خوب در رشت می‌شناسید که بهم معرفی کنید؟ باحوصله باشه و شرح‌حال کامل بگیره. هوموفوب نباشه. هنر دارودرمانی‌اش خوب باشه و به‌اندازه دارو بده و زیادی محافظه‌کار یا ریسک‌پذیر نباشه در تغییر دارو یا دوز دارو. https://t.me/TheSarachi?direct

❤‍🔥10

20 Jul 2026, 13:26 UTC614 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

داعش که بود و چه کرد؟ پادکست رپاپ https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/wrapup-%D8%B1%D9%BE%D8%A7%D9%BE/id1619058453

20 Jul 2026, 11:21 UTC502 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @oneminMH

#سورچه همان #کراک #هروئین است. ماده مخدر جدیدی در سال‌های اخیر وارد بازار شده است به نام #سورچه که تاثیرات بالینی آن بسیار شبیه مخدرها و به‌ویژه هروئین است. اما نکته جالب توجه این است که محتوای دقیق این ماده در آزمایشگاه بررسی و نشان داده شده که ۷۰ درصد از محتوای سورچه همان هروئین است و ۳۰ درصد باقیمانده را کافئین تشکیل می‌دهد. اما نکته ترسناک ماجرا این است که این دقیقا همان ترکیب موجود در #کراک است. منظورم البته

😭7

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @TheSarachi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Dr.mostafanaeimi
@drmostafanaeimi · 139,769
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 13 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ساراچی” (@TheSarachi), 744 subscribers as measured 31 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TheSarachi.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.