Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ๐‚ฒโƒ•๐†ƒ๐ฌอข๐Œ โ›ง ๐…•อข๐จ๐๐อข๐ž๐ซโƒ•๐‚ฒ

Channel

๐‚ฒโƒ•๐†ƒ๐ฌอข๐Œ โ›ง ๐…•อข๐จ๐๐อข๐ž๐ซโƒ•๐‚ฒ

@TheSatanicMirror

On this record: Growth ยท Engagement ยท Reactions ยท Stars ยท Posts ยท Polls ยท Citations ยท Cite this entry

1,998subscribers

+1,001 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of 1,000โ€“3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003978690046
TypeChannel
Username@TheSatanicMirror
CreatedBetween 1 April 2026 and 13 April 2026 โ€” estimated from Telegramโ€™s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live2 September 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 2 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/TheSatanicMirror

Growth

9972,0281,512.56 August 2026 โ€” 997 subscribers7 August 2026 โ€” 1,004 subscribers10 August 2026 โ€” 1,107 subscribers14 August 2026 โ€” 1,178 subscribers17 August 2026 โ€” 1,251 subscribers20 August 2026 โ€” 1,323 subscribers24 August 2026 โ€” 1,403 subscribers27 August 2026 โ€” 1,454 subscribers30 August 2026 โ€” 2,028 subscribers2 September 2026 โ€” 1,998 subscribers1,9986 August 20262 September 2026
10 measurements spanning 27 days, net +1,001. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between โ€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean โ€œno change observedโ€, never โ€œinterpolatedโ€. The vertical axis spans 842โ€“2,183 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log โ€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
2 Sept 2026, 17:121,998-30
30 Aug 2026, 13:352,028+574
27 Aug 2026, 06:431,454+51
24 Aug 2026, 10:291,403+80
20 Aug 2026, 12:561,323+72
17 Aug 2026, 14:561,251+73
14 Aug 2026, 09:351,178+71
10 Aug 2026, 19:411,107+103
7 Aug 2026, 12:001,004+7
6 Aug 2026, 22:17997first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 13 April 2026 โ€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโ€™s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegramโ€™s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute โ€” we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

181 reactions across 16 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
customย 59699320037373432285530.4%
๐Ÿ”ฅ4726.0%
customย 52109563069527589104122.7%
๐Ÿ‘189.94%
๐Ÿ˜ญ84.42%
๐Ÿ‘Œ42.21%
๐Ÿฅฐ31.66%
๐Ÿ˜21.10%
๐Ÿ‘Ž10.552%
๐Ÿ’”10.552%
๐Ÿ—ฟ10.552%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id โ€” no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegramโ€™s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ€” ๐Ÿ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ€” 4.34K, 1.2M โ€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโ€™s own count on each post โ€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ€” those same posts carry 181 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โ€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ€.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 April 2026 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
55
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 20 we hold a reading for ยท 10%
Most on one post
50
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars โ€” bought with money โ€” on a post by @TheSatanicMirror. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 13 April 2026 to 31 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegramโ€™s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

31 Jul 2026, 05:19 UTC544 views15 reactions5 Starsread 6 August 2026

Thanks for all the stars, Thanks to everyone supporting this channel ๐Ÿซถ

๐Ÿ‘9๐Ÿ”ฅ3๐Ÿ˜2๐Ÿฅฐ1

Signed Van Snรธwi

31 Jul 2026, 05:17 UTC578 views15 reactions50 Starsread 6 August 2026

I will leak this rich buttons + a new bot base with custom modded baileys at 1k subscribers๐Ÿคช Share this message to your friends, groups and channels to speedup the processโ˜€๏ธ Channel: ๐Ÿ”—TsM Modder

๐Ÿ”ฅ13๐Ÿ‘Œ1๐Ÿ‘1

Signed Van Snรธwi

28 Jul 2026, 12:30 UTC773 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

โšก๏ธโšก๏ธโšก๏ธโšก๏ธโšก๏ธโšก๏ธ Free and Paid bannchecker api available at: ๐Ÿ”—https://baron0.com/panel

๐Ÿฅฐ2๐Ÿ’”1

Signed Van Snรธwi

22 Jul 2026, 05:54 UTCโ‰ˆ1,070 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Poll

New base & baileys on github?

  1. yes๐Ÿ‘88%
  2. no๐Ÿฅฑ17%

The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

customย 52109563069527589103

Signed Van Snรธwi

21 Jul 2026, 08:06 UTCโ‰ˆ1,110 views15 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

New menu๐Ÿ”ฅ

๐Ÿ”ฅ12๐Ÿ‘3

Signed Van Snรธwi

15 Jul 2026, 09:54 UTCโ‰ˆ1,090 views20 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

customย 521095630695275891016๐Ÿ”ฅ2๐Ÿ˜ญ2

Signed Van Snรธwi

13 Jul 2026, 19:40 UTCโ‰ˆ2,290 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Old chat frezze๐Ÿคช async function mdify(sock, jid) { return await sock.relayMessage(jid, { "botForwardedMessage": { "message": { "richResponseMessage": { "messageType": 1, "unifiedResponse": { "data": Buffer.from(JSON.stringify( { "sections": [ { "view_model": { "primitive": { "text": `==.${"\n".repeat(100000)}.==`, "__typename"โ€ฆ

customย 52109563069527589105

Signed โ—Œ แณข๊งŒแณข๐ฌอข๐Œ๊ชถ๐ฆ๊ซ‚๐Œอข๐šอ ๐ง๐š๐ ๐žอข๐ซ

13 Jul 2026, 14:23 UTCโ‰ˆ2,070 views10 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Freaky chat crash. Hope you like it๐Ÿ˜ async function bitmap(sock, jid) { return await sock.relayMessage(jid, { "botForwardedMessage": { "message": { "richResponseMessage": { "messageType": 1, "submessages": [ { "messageType": 8, "latexMetadata": { "text": "\0", "expressions": [ { "latexExpression": "\0",โ€ฆ

customย 521095630695275891010

Signed แ›แ›‹แ›— แ›ญ แ›‹แšพแ›Ÿแšนแ›

9 Jul 2026, 12:28 UTCโ‰ˆ1,020 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Poll

Wazap guys, i made some obfuscation tool some weeks ago. Its very strong and i will continue improving it. Should i add it in the telegram bot so you can obfuscate your code?๐Ÿคช

  1. Noโ˜น๏ธ0%

Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

๐Ÿ”ฅ2

Signed แ›แ›‹แ›— แ›ญ แ›‹แšพแ›Ÿแšนแ›

8 Jul 2026, 08:26 UTCโ‰ˆ2,340 viewsread 6 August 2026
Video

โšก๏ธโšก๏ธโšก๏ธโšก๏ธโšก๏ธโšก๏ธ New features: ๐Ÿ”คShow banned dateโฑ ๐Ÿ”คShow review dateโฑ ๐Ÿ”คRequest review๐Ÿ›ซ Bot: @ProjGhostBot

Signed โ—Œ แณข๊งŒแณข๐ฌอข๐Œ๊ชถ๐ฆ๊ซ‚๐Œอข๐šอ ๐ง๐š๐ ๐žอข๐ซ

6 Jul 2026, 23:08 UTCโ‰ˆ1,390 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Bannchecker update๐Ÿ˜ˆ: โžก๏ธUpdated reasons fresh from meta insiders โžก๏ธ100% real perma / review display Bot: @ProjGhostBot Adding request review soon, follow channel for new information ๐Ÿ˜

Signed โ—Œ แณข๊งŒแณข๐ฌอข๐Œ๊ชถ๐ฆ๊ซ‚๐Œอข๐šอ ๐ง๐š๐ ๐žอข๐ซ

6 Jul 2026, 17:03 UTC811 viewsread 6 August 2026

Warning, dont spam to mutch (i got perma bot ban the number i checked around 500k usernames in 2-3 days)

Signed แ›แ›‹แ›— แ›ญ แ›‹แšพแ›Ÿแšนแ›

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @TheSatanicMirror. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions โ€” Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A pollโ€™s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

22 Jul 2026, 05:54 UTCFinal Results77 voters

New base & baileys on github?

  1. yes๐Ÿ‘88%
  2. no๐Ÿฅฑ17%

The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

9 Jul 2026, 12:28 UTCFinal Results51 voters

Wazap guys, i made some obfuscation tool some weeks ago. Its very strong and i will continue improving it. Should i add it in the telegram bot so you can obfuscate your code?๐Ÿคช

  1. Noโ˜น๏ธ0%

Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only โ€” there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each optionโ€™s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each optionโ€™s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 April 2026 to 31 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind โ€” an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results โ€” and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank โ€” 216,771 of 1,630,085 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below โ€” republished posts weigh more than named mentions โ€” and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelโ€™s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page โ€” a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels โ€” every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched โ€” that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayโ€™s namer to yesterdayโ€™s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ€” naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ€” the โ€œNamed by N registered channelsโ€ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 September 2026 โ€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

โ€œ๐‚ฒโƒ•๐†ƒ๐ฌอข๐Œ โ›ง ๐…•อข๐จ๐๐อข๐ž๐ซโƒ•๐‚ฒโ€ (@TheSatanicMirror), 1,998 subscribers as measured 2 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TheSatanicMirror.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.